The treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), two antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER2, is burdened by progression of disease related to the acquisition of mechanisms of resistance. Resistance to T-DM1 is caused by the decrease of HER2 expression, the alteration of intracellular trafficking, the impairment of lysosome functions, the drug expulsion through efflux pumps and the activation of alternative signal pathways. Instead, the decrease of HER2 expression and SLX4 loss of function mutations represent the first evidences of mechanisms of resistance to T-DXd, according to the results of DAISY trial. Several strategies are under evaluation to overcome resistances to anti-HER2 ADCs and improve clinical outcomes in patients progressing on these agents: combinations with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, statins, immune checkpoint inhibitors and synthetic DNA-damaging agents are emerging as promising approaches. Furthermore, novel anti-HER2 ADCs with innovative structures and mechanisms of action are in development, in the attempt to further improve the activity and tolerability of currently available agents.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) represent a surrogate biomarker of anti-tumor, lymphocyte-mediated immunity. In early, triple-negative breast cancer, TILs have level 1B of evidence to predict clinical outcomes. TILs represent a promising biomarker to select patients who can experience a better prognosis with de-intensified cancer treatments and derive larger benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the assessment and the validation of TILs as a biomarker require a prospective and rigorous demonstration of its clinical validity and utility, provided reproducible analytical performance. With pending data about the prospective validation of TILs’ clinical validity to modulate treatments in early breast cancer, this review summarizes the most important current issues and future challenges related to the implementation of TILs assessments across all breast cancer subtypes and their potential integration into clinical practice.

The clinical development and then the progressive entry in clinical practice of antibody–drug conjugates (ADC) have marked a transformative advancement in the overall cancer treatment. ADCs have been extensively tested for a large number of tumors, reporting heterogeneous clinical efficacy and safety results. In some diseases, the advent of ADCs has yielded significant changes in the prognostic trajectory, portending an improvement of the survival and/or quality of life. ADCs are targeted agents, capable of delivering highly cytotoxic payloads selectively to antigen-expressing cancer cells. As such, they have been intended as perfect “bullets” to enable the promise of precision medicine, toward high-efficacy and limited-toxicity treatment options. However, only some approved ADCs are intended for the use in biomarker-selected patient populations, restricting potentially the opportunity to be more precise. Yet, key characteristics of modern ADCs might allow the activity of ADCs in tumors with heterogeneous or low expression of cancer antigens, resulting in a clinical activity that could sublimate the classic paradigm of a drug-to-target perfect match. In our review, we portrayed the current landscape of approved ADCs, reporting data of activity as related to the expression of the cancer antigens, and elucidating possible determinants of the safety and efficacy, including when used in a therapeutic sequence.

For decades, the stomach was considered a sterile organ, due to the acid environment. However, starting from the discovery of Helicobacter pylori, this concept has progressively refined. By damaging the hydrochloric acid-secreting glands, H. pylori infection primes the progression from acute to chronic inflammation in gastric mucosa resulting in atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and ultimately gastric cancer (GC). Due to the challenging identification of culturing bacteria, the carcinogenic role of gastric microbial community, other than H. pylori, remains underestimated. More recently, a growing body of evidence has pointed out the dynamism of gastric microbiota as a crucial step for GC development, besides elucidating some additional activity in modulating the efficacy of cancer treatments. In turn, anticancer therapies can shape gastric microbiota with consequent dysbiosis and a potential correlation with drug-related toxicity. In conclusion, the current review aims to deepen the role of gut microbiota as a key factor in gastric disease at multiple levels, from carcinogenesis to the metastatic phase. It also provides novel insights on gastric microbiota as potential target for tailoring multimodal strategies, either surgical or oncological, to finally provide our patients with more individualized treatment options.