The Semyenov-2 hydrothermal field located at 13°31′N of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) is associated with an oceanic core complex (OCC) and hosted by peridotites and basalts with minor amounts of gabbro and plagiogranites. Seafloor massive sulphides (SMS) are represented by chimneys with zonality, massive sulphides without zonality and sulphide breccia cemented by opal and aragonite. The mean value of Au (20.6 ppm) and Te (40 ppm) is much higher than average for the MAR SMS deposits (3.2 ppm and 8.0 ppm, respectively). Generally, these high concentrations reflect the presence of a wide diversity of Au and Te minerals associated with major mineral paragenesis: primary native gold, melonite (NiTe₂) and tellurobismuthite (Bi₂Te₃) are related to high-temperature chalcopyrite (~350 °C); electrum (AuAg)₁, hessite (Ag₂Te) and altaite (PbTe) are related to medium- and low-temperature Zn-sulphide and opal assemblages (260–230 °C). Calaverite (AuTe₂) and Te-rich “fahlore” Cu₁₂(Sb,As,Te)₄S₁₃ are texturally related to the chalcopyrite-bornite-covellite. Enrichment of Au in sulphide breccia with opal and aragonite cement is driven by the re-deposition and the process of hydrothermal reworking of sulphide. The low-temperature fluid mobilizes gold from primary sulphide, along with Au and Te minerals. As a result, the secondary gold re-precipitate in cement of sulphide breccia. An additional contribution of Au enrichment is the presence of aragonite in the Cu-Zn breccia where the maximal Au content (188 ppm) is reached.

The internal structure of Seafloor Massive Sulfides (SMS) deposits is one of the most important and complex issues facing the study of modern hydrothermal ore systems. The Semenov-5 hydrothermal field is a unique area where mass wasting on the slope of the oceanic core complex (OCC) structure exposes the subsurface portion of the deposit and offers an exceptional opportunity to observe massive sulfides that have formed not only on the seafloor but in sub-seafloor zones as well. This paper examines the internal structure of the OCC-related Semenov-5 hydrothermal field along with analysis of the mineralogy and chemistry of different parts of sulfide deposit. The seafloor deposit is comprised of pyrite, marcasite, hematite, goethite, lepidocrocite, rare pyrrhotite, isocubanite and Co-rich pyrite. Sulfide chemistry indicates the prevailing influence of ultramafics on their composition irrespective of the spatial relation with basalt lavas. Sub-seafloor mineralization is associated with ultramafic rocks and is represented by massive and disseminated sulfides. Pyrrhotite, isocubanite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, Co-rich pyrite, quartz with rutile, quarts with hematite and Cr-spinels are fixed in massive subseafloor mineralization. The presence of Cr-spinels as well as a very high Cr content are regarded as indicators of the metasomatic nature of this part of the deposit that had formed as a result of ultramafic replacement. As a result, three zones of a hydrothermal ore-forming system have been described: massive sulfides precipitated from hot vents on the surface of the seafloor, massive sulfides formed due to replacement of ultramafics below the seafloor and disseminated sulfide mineralization-filled cracks in hosted rocks which have formed stockwork around metasomatic massive sulfides. Despite differences in the mineral and geochemical composition of sub-seafloor and seafloor mineralization, all minerals subject to the sample formed as a consequence of fluid circulation in ultramafic rocks and were linked by a common ore-forming process.