Emanuele Gruppioni

Dr. Emanuele Gruppioni

Centro Protesi Inail, Research Area, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 January 2018 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Linda PaternòLinda Paternò
Linda Paternò
MIMichele Ibrahimi
Michele Ibrahimi
EGEmanuele Gruppioni
Emanuele Gruppioni
Arianna MenciassiArianna Menciassi
Arianna Menciassi
LRLeonardo Ricotti
Leonardo Ricotti
In the prosthetics field, one of the most important bottlenecks is still the human-machine interface, namely the socket. Indeed, several amputees still reject their prostheses or report a low satisfaction level, due to factors dealing with the socket-tissues interaction. The aim of this paper is to describe the main parameters (displacements, stress, volume fluctuations and temperature) that affect the stump-socket interface and reduce the comfort of limb prostheses. In the review, a classification of the different socket types proposed in the literature is reported, together with an analysis of advantages and disadvantages of the different solutions, from multiple viewpoints. A specific focus concerns the technological solutions available commercially and in the state-of-the-art to face an altered distribution of stresses on the residual limb tissues, volume fluctuations affecting the stump overtime, and temperature variations affecting the residual tissues within the socket. The open challenges in this research field are highlighted and the possible future routes are discussed, towards the ambitious objective of achieving an advanced socket able to self-adapt in real-time to the complex interplay of factors affecting the stump, during both static and dynamic tasks.

30 September 2020 in Science Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matteo LaffranchiMatteo Laffranchi
Matteo Laffranchi
NBN. Boccardo
N. Boccardo
STS. Traverso
S. Traverso
LLL. Lombardi
L. Lombardi
MCMichele Canepa
Michele Canepa
LML. De Michieli
L. De Michieli
A prosthetic hand with human-like grasping behavior outperforms what is required in the execution of activities of daily living.

20 February 2019 in Science Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LZLoredana Zollo
Loredana Zollo
GPGiovanni Di Pino
Giovanni Di Pino
ACAnna L. Ciancio
Anna L. Ciancio
FRFederico Ranieri
Federico Ranieri
Francesca CordellaFrancesca Cordella
Francesca Cordella
EGEugenio Guglielmelli
Eugenio Guglielmelli
Sensory output produced by a robotic hand during grasping and manipulation evoked real-time nearly natural force and slippage feedback.

1 May 2009 in Journal of Physiology-Paris
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCClaudio Castellini
Claudio Castellini
EGEmanuele Gruppioni
Emanuele Gruppioni
ADAngelo Davalli
Angelo Davalli
GSGiulio Sandini
Giulio Sandini

14 August 2017 in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAlberto Dellacasa Bellingegni
Alberto Dellacasa Bellingegni
EGEmanuele Gruppioni
Emanuele Gruppioni
GCGiorgio Colazzo
Giorgio Colazzo
Angelo DavalliAngelo Davalli
Angelo Davalli
RSRinaldo Sacchetti
Rinaldo Sacchetti
LZLoredana Zollo
Loredana Zollo
Currently, the typically adopted hand prosthesis surface electromyography (sEMG) control strategies do not provide the users with a natural control feeling and do not exploit all the potential of commercially available multi-fingered hand prostheses. Pattern recognition and machine learning techniques applied to sEMG can be effective for a natural control based on the residual muscles contraction of amputated people corresponding to phantom limb movements. As the researches has reached an advanced grade accuracy, these algorithms have been proved and the embedding is necessary for the realization of prosthetic devices. The aim of this work is to provide engineering tools and indications on how to choose the most suitable classifier, and its specific internal settings for an embedded control of multigrip hand prostheses. By means of an innovative statistical analysis, we compare 4 different classifiers: Nonlinear Logistic Regression, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Support Vector Machine and Linear Discriminant Analysis, which was considered as ground truth. Experimental tests have been performed on sEMG data collected from 30 people with trans-radial amputation, in which the algorithms were evaluated for both performance and computational burden, then the statistical analysis has been based on the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test and statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. The comparative analysis among NLR, MLP and SVM shows that, for either classification performance and for the number of classification parameters, SVM attains the highest values followed by MLP, and then by NLR. However, using as unique constraint to evaluate the maximum acceptable complexity of each classifier one of the typically available memory of a high performance microcontroller, the comparison pointed out that for people with trans-radial amputation the algorithm that produces the best compromise is NLR closely followed by MLP. This result was also confirmed by the comparison with LDA with time domain features, which provided not significant differences of performance and computational burden between NLR and LDA. The proposed analysis would provide innovative engineering tools and indications on how to choose the most suitable classifier based on the application and the desired results for prostheses control.

7 April 2022 in npj Regenerative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FIFederica Iberite
Federica Iberite
EGEmanuele Gruppioni
Emanuele Gruppioni
LRLeonardo Ricotti
Leonardo Ricotti
Although skeletal muscle repairs itself following small injuries, genetic diseases or severe damages may hamper its ability to do so. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can generate myogenic progenitors, but their use in combination with bioengineering strategies to modulate their phenotype has not been sufficiently investigated. This review highlights the potential of this combination aimed at pushing the boundaries of skeletal muscle tissue engineering. First, the overall organization and the key steps in the myogenic process occurring in vivo are described. Second, transgenic and non-transgenic approaches for the myogenic induction of human iPSCs are compared. Third, technologies to provide cells with biophysical stimuli, biomaterial cues, and biofabrication strategies are discussed in terms of recreating a biomimetic environment and thus helping to engineer a myogenic phenotype. The embryonic development process and the pro-myogenic role of the muscle-resident cell populations in co-cultures are also described, highlighting the possible clinical applications of iPSCs in the skeletal muscle tissue engineering field.