Andrew Sharpley

Prof. Andrew Sharpley

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2013 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAndrew Sharpley
Andrew Sharpley
HJHelen P. Jarvie
Helen P. Jarvie
ABAnthony Buda
Anthony Buda
LMLinda May
Linda May
BSBryan Spears
Bryan Spears
PKPeter Kleinman
Peter Kleinman
The water quality response to implementation of conservation measures across watersheds has been slower and smaller than expected. This has led many to question the efficacy of these measures and to call for stricter land and nutrient management strategies. In many cases, this limited response has been due to the legacies of past management activities, where sinks and stores of P along the land–freshwater continuum mask the effects of reductions in edge-of-field losses of P. Accounting for legacy P along this continuum is important to correctly apportion sources and to develop successful watershed remediation. In this study, we examined the drivers of legacy P at the watershed scale, specifically in relation to the physical cascades and biogeochemical spirals of P along the continuum from soils to rivers and lakes and via surface and subsurface flow pathways. Terrestrial P legacies encompass prior nutrient and land management activities that have built up soil P to levels that exceed crop requirements and modified the connectivity between terrestrial P sources and fluvial transport. River and lake P legacies encompass a range of processes that control retention and remobilization of P, and these are linked to water and sediment residence times. We provide case studies that highlight the major processes and varying timescales across which legacy P continues to contribute P to receiving waters and undermine restoration efforts, and we discuss how these P legacies could be managed in future conservation programs. Copyright © 2013. . Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

15 February 2015 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAndrew Sharpley
Andrew Sharpley
LBLars Bergström
Lars Bergström
HAHelena Aronsson
Helena Aronsson
MBMarianne Bechmann
Marianne Bechmann
CBCarl H. Bolster
Carl H. Bolster
PWPaul Withers
Paul Withers
The series of papers in this issue of AMBIO represent technical presentations made at the 7th International Phosphorus Workshop (IPW7), held in September, 2013 in Uppsala, Sweden. At that meeting, the 150 delegates were involved in round table discussions on major, predetermined themes facing the management of agricultural phosphorus (P) for optimum production goals with minimal water quality impairment. The six themes were (1) P management in a changing world; (2) transport pathways of P from soil to water; (3) monitoring, modeling, and communication; (4) importance of manure and agricultural production systems for P management; (5) identification of appropriate mitigation measures for reduction of P loss; and (6) implementation of mitigation strategies to reduce P loss. This paper details the major challenges and research needs that were identified for each theme and identifies a future roadmap for catchment management that cost-effectively minimizes P loss from agricultural activities.

15 February 2015 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPeter J. A. Kleinman
Peter J. A. Kleinman
ASAndrew Sharpley
Andrew Sharpley
PWPaul Withers
Paul Withers
LBLars Bergström
Lars Bergström
LJLaura T. Johnson
Laura T. Johnson
DDDonnacha Doody
Donnacha Doody
Experience with implementing agricultural phosphorus (P) strategies highlights successes and uncertainty over outcomes. We examine case studies from the USA, UK, and Sweden under a gradient of voluntary, litigated, and regulatory settings. In the USA, voluntary strategies are complicated by competing objectives between soil conservation and dissolved P mitigation. In litigated watersheds, mandated manure export has not wrought dire consequences on poultry farms, but has adversely affected beef producers who fertilize pastures with manure. In the UK, regulatory and voluntary approaches are improving farmer awareness, but require a comprehensive consideration of P management options to achieve downstream reductions. In Sweden, widespread subsidies sometime hinder serious assessment of program effectiveness. In all cases, absence of local data can undermine recommendations from models and outside experts. Effective action requires iterative application of existing knowledge of P fate and transport, coupled with unabashed description and demonstration of tradeoffs to local stakeholders.

1 March 2008 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAndrew Sharpley
Andrew Sharpley
PKPeter J. A. Kleinman
Peter J. A. Kleinman
AHA. Louise Heathwaite
A. Louise Heathwaite
WGWilliam J. Gburek
William J. Gburek
GFGordon J. Folmar
Gordon J. Folmar
JSJohn P. Schmidt
John P. Schmidt

1 September 2009 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAndrew Sharpley
Andrew Sharpley
PKPeter J.A. Kleinman
Peter J.A. Kleinman
PJPhilip Jordan
Philip Jordan
LBLars Bergström
Lars Bergström
AAArthur L. Allen
Arthur L. Allen

1 March 2008 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSThomas W. Simpson
Thomas W. Simpson
ASAndrew Sharpley
Andrew Sharpley
RHRobert W. Howarth
Robert W. Howarth
HPHans W. Paerl
Hans W. Paerl
KMKyle R. Mankin
Kyle R. Mankin