Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast (FELs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms exhibiting a histologic spectrum ranging from fibroadenomas (FAs) to malignant phyllodes tumors (PTs). Despite published histologic criteria for their classification, it is common for such lesions to exhibit overlapping features, leading to subjective interpretation and interobserver disagreements in histologic diagnosis. Therefore, there is a need for a more objective diagnostic modality to aid in the accurate classification of these lesions and to guide appropriate clinical management. In this study, the expression of 750 tumor-related genes was measured in a cohort of 34 FELs (5 FAs, 9 cellular FAs, 9 benign PTs, 7 borderline PTs, and 4 malignant PTs). Differentially expressed gene analysis, gene set analysis, pathway analysis, and cell type analysis were performed. Genes involved in matrix remodeling and metastasis (e.g., MMP9, SPP1, COL11A1), angiogenesis (VEGFA, ITGAV, NFIL3, FDFR1, CCND2), hypoxia (ENO1, HK1, CYBB, HK2), metabolic stress (e.g., UBE2C, CDKN2A, FBP1), cell proliferation (e.g., CENPF, CCNB1), and the PI3K-Akt pathway (e.g., ITGB3, NRAS) were highly expressed in malignant PTs and less expressed in borderline PTs, benign PTs, cellular FAs, and FAs. The overall gene expression profiles of benign PTs, cellular FAs, and FAs were very similar. Although a slight difference was observed between borderline and benign PTs, a higher degree of difference was observed between borderline and malignant PTs. Additionally, the macrophage cell abundance scores and CCL5 were significantly higher in malignant PTs compared with all other groups. Our results suggest that the gene-expression-profiling-based approach could lead to further stratification of FELs and may provide clinically useful biological and pathophysiological information to improve the existing histologic diagnostic algorithm.

To evaluate the expression of insulin‐like growth factor II mRNA‐binding protein (IMP3), CK8/18, and CK14 in BRCA mutated and sporadic invasive breast carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry for IMP3, CK8/18, and CK14 was performed on 39 cases of invasive breast carcinomas with BRCA mutation (24 BRCA1, 14 BRCA2, and 1 dual BRCA1/BRCA2) and 54 cases of sporadic invasive breast carcinomas. The relationship between the IMP3, CK8/18, and CK14 and the tumor grade and molecular phenotypes were analyzed. IMP3, CK8/18, and CK14 positivity were present in 20 (51%), 22 (56%), and 14 (36%) of 39 BRCA‐mutated breast carcinomas, and 11 (20%), 53 (98%), and 24 (44%) of 54 sporadic breast carcinomas respectively. The rates of IMP3 expression and absence of CK8/18 (44% versus 2%) in BRCA‐mutated breast carcinomas was significantly higher than the sporadic breast carcinomas (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed for CK14 among the two groups (p = 0.408). No significant difference was observed among BRCA1‐related and BRCA2‐related breast carcinomas in the immunoprofile for IMP3, CK8/18, and CK14. No significant correlation was identified between the expression of IMP3 and CK8/18 and the tumor grade in both BRCA‐mutated and sporadic breast carcinomas (p > 0.05). In cases with luminal A and B phenotypes, the rates of expression of IMP3 and loss of CK8/18 were significantly higher in BRCA‐mutated as compared to sporadic breast carcinoma (p < 0.001). In cases with basal‐like phenotype, the absence of CK8/18 expression was significantly higher in BRCA‐mutated breast carcinomas (54% versus 0%, p = 0.001), while no difference was observed for IMP3 expression (p = 0.435). Regardless of mutation type, histologic grade, or molecular phenotype, the absence of CK8/18 expression and presence of IMP3 expression are seen at much higher rate in BRCA mutated breast carcinomas.

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast encompass a broad spectrum of lesions from fibroadenomas and their variants to phyllodes tumors, including their clinical range of benign, borderline, and malignant. Classification of this spectrum of neoplasms has historically and currently been based purely on morphology, although the nomenclature has shifted over the years largely due to the significant histologic overlap that exists primarily within the cellular fibroadenomas to borderline malignant phyllodes tumor categories. A review of the current diagnostic challenge, proposed ancillary studied and their value in prognostic significance, is provided. This article highlights the most recent molecular and genetic findings as well as the limitations of the studies, in the context of practical and available applications for the diagnostician and managerial implications for the clinician.

Background: Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) shares histologic features with both classical lobular carcinoma in situ (cLCIS) and high-grade ductal carcinoma in-situ (hgDCIS), leading to ambiguity on optimal clinical management. Retrospective gene expression profiling and analysis were used to explore the biological behavior of PLCIS relative to cLCIS and hgDCIS. Methods: This is a retrospective study. Overall, 16 PLCIS specimens, 10 cLCIS specimens, and 9 hgDCIS cases were included; gene expression using a 725 cancer-related gene expression assay was measured. Results: PLCIS gene expression profile had greater overlap with cLCIS than hgDCIS. E2F target genes were upregulated in PLCIS compared to cLCIS, while glycolysis genes and interferon-α genes were upregulated in hgDCIS relative to PLCIS. Conclusion: Although gene set analysis suggests PLICS could have more aggressive behavior than cLCIS, gene expression profiling suggests it has closer biological behavior to cLCIS than to hgDCIS. Long-term clinical outcome studies are still needed to determine prognosis and optimal management.

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast (FELs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms exhibiting a histologic spectrum ranging from fibroadenomas (FAs) to malignant phyllodes tumors (PTs). Despite published histologic criteria for their classification, it is common for such lesions to exhibit overlapping features, leading to subjective interpretation and inter-observer disagreements in histologic diagnosis. Therefore, there is a need for a more objective diagnostic modality to aid in the accurate classification of these lesions and to guide appropriate clinical management. In this study, the expression of 750 tumor-related genes was measured in a cohort of 34 FELs (5 FAs, 9 cellular FAs, 9 benign PTs, 7 borderline PTs, and 4 malignant PTs). Differentially expressed gene analysis, gene set analysis, pathway analysis, and cell type analysis were performed. Genes involved in matrix remodeling and metastasis (e.g., MMP9, SPP1, COL11A1), angiogenesis (VEGFA, ITGAV, NFIL3, FDFR1, CCND2), hypoxia (ENO1, HK1, CYBB, HK2), metabolic stress (e.g., UBE2C, CDKN2A, FBP1), cell proliferation (e.g., CENPF, CCNB1), PI3K-Akt pathway (e.g., ITGB3, NRAS) were highly expressed in malignant PTs and less expressed in borderline PTs, benign PTs, cellular FAs, and FAs. The overall gene expression profiles of benign PTs, cellular FAs, and FAs were very similar. Although a slight difference was observed between borderline and benign PTs, a higher degree of difference was observed between borderline and malignant PTs. Additionally, the macrophage cell abundance scores and CCL5 were significantly higher in malignant PTs compared with all other groups. Our results suggest that the gene expression profiling-based approach could lead to further stratification of FELs and may provide clinically useful biological and pathophysiological information to improve the existing histologic diagnostic algorithm.