Sherif A. Mourad

Prof. Sherif A. Mourad

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2012 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHuda Helmy
Huda Helmy
HSHamed Salem
Hamed Salem
SMSherif A. Mourad
Sherif A. Mourad

1 June 2016 in Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMohammed H. Serror
Mohammed H. Serror
EHEmad M. Hassan
Emad M. Hassan
SMSherif A. Mourad
Sherif A. Mourad

1 September 2018 in Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OEOmar H. Elkhabeery
Omar H. Elkhabeery
SSSherif S. Safar
Sherif S. Safar
SMSherif A. Mourad
Sherif A. Mourad

1 October 2013 in Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHuda Helmy
Huda Helmy
HSHamed Salem
Hamed Salem
SMSherif A. Mourad
Sherif A. Mourad
A building is subjected to progressive collapse when a primary vertical structural element fails, resulting in the failure of adjoining structural elements, which cause further structural failure, leading eventually to partial or total collapse of the structure. The failure of a primary vertical support might occur because of extreme loadings such as a bomb explosion in a terrorist attack, a car colliding with supports in a parking garage, an accidental explosion of explosive materials, or a severe earthquake. Different design codes address the progressive collapse of structures attributable to the sudden loss of a main vertical support such as the General Services Administration (GSA) code and the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). The alternative path method (APM) is the main analysis method for evaluating the hazard of progressive collapse in the two codes. The APM requires that the structure be capable of bridging over a missing structural element, with the resulting extent of damage being loc...

1 December 2018 in Alexandria Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YMYara M. Mahmoud
Yara M. Mahmoud
MHMaha Hassan
Maha Hassan
SMSherif A. Mourad
Sherif A. Mourad
HSHesham S. Sayed
Hesham S. Sayed

1 June 2015 in Case Studies in Structural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GAGhada Aboul-Nasr
Ghada Aboul-Nasr
SMSherif A. Mourad
Sherif A. Mourad
The force density method (FDM) is a classical method used in linear and nonlinear form. The linear approach presents a quick tool for finding cable net new shapes by solving a set of linear equilibrium equations for certain topology, boundary conditions and assumed cables force density. The nonlinear approach was introduced to solve cable nets under constraints (assigned certain distance between nodes, limit force or unstressed length in some elements). Any type of constraint introduces nonlinearity.This paper studied the prestressed cable nets and the loaded cable nets. For prestressed cable nets, coordinate constraints to all nodes of the cable net are introduced to modify the shape after graphically examining the preliminary shape. This preliminary shape resulted from linear analysis of assumed distribution of cable force densities. For analyzing cable nets under different load cases, the first load case is analyzed to achieve the coordinate constraints assigned to nodes. Analysis results are node coordinates, cable forces and lengths. Young’s modulus and areas of cables are used to calculate the unstressed length of all cables using materialization equations, those lengths are used as constraint in the analysis of other load cases. Forces in all cables under different load cases/combinations are calculated. By using this approach, design of cable net under static load is simplified