The wsb1 gene has been identified to be important in developmental biology and cancer. A complex transcriptional regulation of wsb1 yields at least three functional transcripts. The major expressed isoform, WSB1 protein, is a substrate recognition protein within an E3 ubiquitin ligase, with the capability to bind diverse targets and mediate ubiquitinylation and proteolytic degradation. Recent data suggests a new role for WSB1 as a component of a neuroprotective pathway which results in modification and aggregation of neurotoxic proteins such as LRRK2 in Parkinson’s Disease, via an unusual mode of protein ubiquitinylation. WSB1 is also involved in thyroid hormone homeostasis, immune regulation and cellular metabolism, particularly glucose metabolism and hypoxia. In hypoxia, wsb1 is a HIF-1 target, and is a regulator of the degradation of diverse proteins associated with the cellular response to hypoxia, including HIPK2, RhoGDI2 and VHL. Major roles are to both protect HIF-1 function through degradation of VHL, and decrease apoptosis through degradation of HIPK2. These activities suggest a role for wsb1 in cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. As well, recent work has identified a role for WSB1 in glucose metabolism, and perhaps in mediating the Warburg effect in cancer cells by maintaining the function of HIF1. Furthermore, studies of cancer specimens have identified dysregulation of wsb1 associated with several types of cancer, suggesting a biologically relevant role in cancer development and/or progression. Recent development of an inducible expression system for wsb1 could aid in the further understanding of the varied functions of this protein in the cell, and roles as a potential oncogene and neuroprotective protein.

Background: Traumatic posterior sternoclavicular joint dislocations are rare orthopaedic emergencies. Treatment typically consists of closed reduction, with surgical management reserved for unstable cases. Because of the low prevalence of this condition, limited clinical evidence exists for a superior surgical stabilization technique. Methods: A systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched using a comprehensive search strategy. A descriptive and critical analysis of the results was performed. Results: Forty relevant studies (108 cases) were identified. Favorable subjective and objective outcomes were reported for all 5 categories of stabilization described. The overall complication rate was 16%, including 4 cases of recurrent instability. Ligament reconstruction using tendon graft had the lowest recurrent instability and complication rates, and open reduction and internal fixation techniques required a second operation for implant removal in 80% of cases. Conclusions: A comprehensive review of the surgical management of traumatic posterior sternoclavicular joint dislocations is presented. Results suggest favorable outcomes for all of the methods of stabilization, with a modest complication rate. The trends observed have helped to guide the development of clinical care recommendations that aid in treatment decision-making for these injuries. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of metastatic bone disease of the extremities (MBD-E) is challenging, and surgical directions pose significant implications for overall patient morbidity and mortality. Recent literature reviews on the surgical management of MBD-E present a paucity of high-level evidence and global inconsistencies in study design. In order to steer productive research, a scoping review was performed to map and assess critical knowledge gaps. The Arksey and O’Malley framework for scoping studies was followed. A comprehensive literature search identified a large body of literature pertaining to the surgical management of MBD-E. Study data and meta-data was extracted and presented using descriptive analytics and a thematic framework. Literature gaps were identified and analyzed. Three hundred eighty five studies from 1969 to 2017 were included. Studies were categorized into 11 separate themes, with the majority (63%) falling into the “surgical fixation strategies” theme, followed by “complications” at 7% and “prognosis and survival” at 6.2%. Less than 3% of studies were categorized in “patient related outcomes” or “epidemiology” themes. 89% of studies were retrospective and only 6 studies were of level 1 or 2 evidence. We identified a temporal increase in publication by decade, and all studies published on interventional radiology techniques or economic analyses were published after 2007 or 2009, respectively. 64.9% of studies were published in Europe and 20.3% were published in North America. Average patient age was 62 (± 5.2 years), and breast was the most common primary tumour (28%), followed by lung (17%) and kidney (15%). In terms of surgical location, 75% of operations involved the femur, followed by the humerus at 22% and tibia at 3%. We present a descriptive overview of the current published literature on the surgical management of MBD-E. Critical knowledge gaps have been identified through the development of a thematic framework. Consolidation of literary gaps must involve bolstered efforts towards patient and family-engaged research initiatives and assessment of patient-related surgical outcomes. Multi-disciplinary engagement in developing prospective research will also help guide evidence-based personalized practice for these patients. By building on existing comprehensive patient databases and registries, knowledge on survival and prognostic parameters can be greatly improved.

Despite being one of the first types of cancers studied that hinted at a major role of the immune system in pro- and anti-tumor biology, little is known about the immune microenvironment in sarcoma. Few types of sarcoma have shown major responses to immunotherapy, and its rarity and heterogeneity makes it challenging to study. With limited systemic treatment options, further understanding of the underlying mechanisms in sarcoma immunity may prove crucial in advancing sarcoma care. While great strides have been made in the field of immunotherapy over the last few decades, most of these efforts have focused on harnessing the T cell response, with little attention on the role B cells may play in the tumor microenvironment. A growing body of evidence suggests that B cells have both pro- and anti-tumoral effects in a large variety of cancers, and in the age of bioinformatics and multi-omic analysis, the complexity of the humoral response is just being appreciated. This review explores what is currently known about the role of B cells in sarcoma, including understanding the various B cell populations associated with sarcoma, the organization of intra-tumoral B cells in tertiary lymphoid structures, recent trials in immunotherapy in sarcoma, intra-tumoral immunoglobulin, the pro-tumor effects of B cells, and exciting future areas for research.

Background: Metastatic bone disease (MBD) presents significant challenges in patient management, leading to skeletal-related events (SREs), compromised health-related quality of life, and heightened pain experiences. Denosumab (Dmab) and zoledronic acid (ZA) are bone-modifying agents (BMAs) commonly employed to mitigate the sequelae of MBD. Previous meta-analyses have assessed primary outcomes such as overall survival, pathological fractures, radiation to bone, and the time to SREs within studies. However, a single comprehensive analysis comparing their efficacy across multiple primary and secondary outcomes, as well as cost-effectiveness in specific cancer types, has not yet been conducted. Methods: A literature search identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the primary outcomes included overall survival, pathologic fractures, radiation to bone, and the time to SREs within studies. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, pain, analgesia usage, quality of life, and cost. Results: Meta-analysis revealed that Dmab effectively reduced the need for bone-targeted radiation therapy and was superior to ZA in delaying the time to SREs, except in multiple myeloma. Dmab also reduced pathological fracture incidences in breast cancer patients by 39%. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that while both agents similarly impact overall survival and disease progression, Dmab offers advantages in SRE reduction and improved HRQoL and pain outcomes with lower rates of opioid usage, albeit with higher risks of hypocalcemia and osteonecrosis in some subgroups. The consensus on cost-effectiveness is mixed and varies based on the cancer type and healthcare system, with some studies favoring Dmab’s superior efficacy and safety, while others find ZA more cost-effective due to its lower cost. This study underscores the potential of Dmab as a preferred BMA for MBD management, especially for high-risk skeletal complications, while highlighting cancer-specific safety considerations. Further research is warranted to refine cancer-specific BMA use and optimize MBD management strategies.