Markus Hundshagen

Mr. Markus Hundshagen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 April 2020 in Journal of Fluids Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NCNicolas Casimir
Nicolas Casimir
Xiangyuan ZhuXiangyuan Zhu
Xiangyuan Zhu
MHMarkus Hundshagen
Markus Hundshagen
GLGerhard Ludwig
Gerhard Ludwig
RSRomuald Skoda
Romuald Skoda
Three-dimensional (3D) unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) flow simulations are conducted to investigate the highly unsteady flow field at part load operation of a centrifugal pump. By the availability of unsteady flow field measurement data in the impeller wake region, a thorough validation of the simulation method is performed. Grid independence of the results is ensured. Unsteady characteristics in terms of head and shaft power as well as transient blade loads are evaluated to assess the unsteady pump performance. Significant mis-loading of the blading is revealed when one blade passes the volute tongue and associated with the strong unsteady and 3D flow field in the impeller-volute tongue region. Negative radial velocity in the tongue region is the origin of a vortex at the blade pressure side and a subsequent pressure drop that leads to even temporally negative blade loading. The results provide a detailed insight in the complex part load flow field that might be utilized for an improved pump design. As a valuable secondary outcome, a comparison of results obtained by two widely used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes for pump flow simulation is provided, i.e., the commercial code ansyscfx and the branch foam-extend of the open source software openfoam. It is found that the results of both methods in terms of unsteady characteristics as well as local ensemble-averaged velocity field are consistent.

11 August 2020 in Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMarkus Hundshagen
Markus Hundshagen
MMMichael Mansour
Michael Mansour
DTDominique Thévenin
Dominique Thévenin
RSRomuald Skoda
Romuald Skoda
An assessment of a two-fluid model assuming a continuous liquid and a dispersed gas phase for 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of gas/liquid flow in a centrifugal research pump is performed. A monodisperse two-fluid model, in conjunction with a statistical eddy-viscosity turbulence model, is utilized. By a comprehensive measurement database, a thorough assessment of model inaccuracies is enabled. The results on a horizontal diffuser flow reveal that the turbulence model is one main limitation of simulation accuracy for gas/liquid flows. Regarding pump flows, distinctions of single-phase and two-phase flow in a closed and semi-open impeller are figured out. Even single-phase flow simulations reveal challenging requirements on a high spatial resolution, e.g., of the rounded blade trailing edge and the tip clearance gap flow. In two-phase pump operation, gas accumulations lead to coherent gas pockets that are predicted partly at wrong locations within the blade channel. At best, a qualitative prediction of gas accumulations and the head drop towards increasing inlet gas volume fractions (IGVF) can be obtained. One main limitation of two-fluid methods for pump flow is figured out in terms of the violation of the dilute, disperse phase assumption due to locally high disperse phase loading within coherent gas accumulations. In these circumstances, bubble population models do not appear beneficial compared to a monodisperse bubble distribution. Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) methods may be utilized to capture the phase interface at large accumulated gas cavities, requiring a high spatial resolution. Thus, a hybrid model, i.e., a dispersed phase two-fluid model including polydispersity for flow regions with a dilute gas phase, should be combined with an interphase capturing model, e.g., in terms of VOF. This hybrid model, together with scale-resolving turbulence models, seems to be indispensable for a quantitative two-phase pump performance prediction.

19 July 2023 in International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMarkus Hundshagen
Markus Hundshagen
KRKevin Rave
Kevin Rave
RSRomuald Skoda
Romuald Skoda

MHMarkus Hundshagen
Markus Hundshagen
RSRomuald Skoda
Romuald Skoda
Predicting pump performance and ensuring operational reliability under two-phase conditions is a major goal of three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of liquid/gas radial centrifugal pump flows. Hence, 3D CFD methods are increasingly applied to such flows in academia and industry. The CFD analysis of liquid/gas pump flows demands careful selection of sub-models from several fields in CFD, such as two-phase and turbulence modeling, as well as high-quality meshing of complex geometries. This paper presents an overview of current CFD simulation strategies, and recent progress in two-phase modeling is outlined. Particular focus is given to different approaches for dispersed bubbly flow and coherent gas accumulations. For dispersed bubbly flow regions, Euler–Euler Two-Fluid models are discussed, including population balance and bubble interaction models. For coherent gas pocket flow, essentially interface-capturing Volume-of-Fluid methods are applied. A hybrid model is suggested, i.e., a combination of an Euler–Euler Two-Fluid model with interface-capturing properties, predicting bubbly flow regimes as well as regimes with coherent gas pockets. The importance of considering scale-resolving turbulence models for highly-unsteady two-phase flow regions is emphasized.

2 December 2022 in Journal of Fluids Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BNBich-Diep Nguyen
Bich-Diep Nguyen
SPSebastian Popp
Sebastian Popp
MHMarkus Hundshagen
Markus Hundshagen
RSRomuald Skoda
Romuald Skoda
MMMichael Mansour
Michael Mansour
CHChristian Hasse
Christian Hasse
Centrifugal pumps conveying gas–liquid flows are often designed based on pure liquid flows due to limited understanding of gas formations within a gas–liquid flow. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can provide insights into the flow characteristics, yet standard multiphase models are not able to describe a wide range of spatial scales. In this study, a hybrid multiphase approach for turbulent flows based on an Eulerian-Eulerian solver with volume-of-fluid (VOF) enhancements is applied, which can handle multiple flow regimes (continuous gas/liquid, disperse bubbles) at once. Large eddy simulations (LES) of gas–liquid-flows through a diverging horizontal channel (diffuser) are performed to evaluate the possibilities and limitations of this approach. Three representative cases, each containing different flow characteristics, are computed using a fixed bubble size approach. The results show that the hybrid approach is able to capture all flow characteristics and predict the gas void size and position precisely. However, it can be observed that the performance of the approach significantly depends on the specified bubble size.

6 May 2022 in Journal of Fluids Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMarkus Hundshagen
Markus Hundshagen
KRKevin Rave
Kevin Rave
BNBich-Diep Nguyen
Bich-Diep Nguyen
SPSebastian Popp
Sebastian Popp
CHChristian Hasse
Christian Hasse
RSRomuald Skoda
Romuald Skoda
In recent optical flow experiments on a transparent volute-type radial centrifugal pump, an accumulation of air bubbles to adherent gas pockets within the impeller blade channels was observed. A transition of unsteady bubbly flow toward an attached gas pocket at the blade suction side was found for increasing air loading of the liquid water phase. This steadily attached pocket shows a distinctive unsteady wake. A reproduction of the transition from bubbly to pocket flow in a three-dimensional (3D) flow simulation demands the treatment of dispersed bubbly flow, on the one hand, and of coherent air regions, on the other hand. Therefore, a hybrid flow solver is adopted based on an Euler–Euler two-fluid (EE2F) method for dispersed flows and features volume-of-fluid (VOF) properties when air accumulations form. A scale-adaptive simulation (SAS) turbulence model is utilized to account for highly unsteady flow regions. For the time being, a monodisperse bubble size distribution is assumed for the dispersed part of the flow. For an operation range close to the design point and rising air loading, the flow transition from bubbly to pocket flow is well captured by the hybrid simulation method. Even an alternating pocket flow in between bubbly and pocket flow regime is predicted. The simulation method is still limited by an appropriate choice of a monodisperse bubble diameter. Therefore, the disperse model part of the hybrid flow solver will be coupled with population balance and bubble interaction models in future studies.