Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common form of kidney cancer with 403,262 diagnoses and 170,000 deaths worldwide in 2018. Although partial or radical nephrectomy can be considered a successful treatment in early-stage or localized RCC, in advanced-stage disease, there is a high risk of metastasis or recurrence with a significantly poorer prognosis. Metastatic RCC is generally resistant to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and, despite several novel therapeutic agents, disease progression and mortality rates remain high. It is necessary to identify new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for the management of this cancer. Knowledge of microRNA (miRNA) has consistently increased in the last year. miRNAs play an important role in several biological processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and cell death. Due to this, miRNAs have been identified as an important key in different diseases, especially in cancer, and several studies show miRNAs as attractive tools and targets for novel therapeutic approaches. Recently several miRNAs (including miR-22, miR-203, miR-301 and miR-193a-3p) have been linked to dysregulated molecular pathways involved with the proliferation of cancerous cells and resistance to therapeutic agents. In the present study, recent data from studies assessing the application of miRNAs as biomarkers, therapeutic targets, or modulators of response to treatment modalities in RCC patients are analyzed.

Women undergoing a radical cystectomy (RC) followed by a urinary diversion (UD) for bladder cancer (BC), experience a substantial reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). At present, studies comparing long-term QOL outcomes for different UD methods in female patients are lacking. We summarize the current state of the QoL assessment in female patients after an RC.

Background: Because of the fear of being infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), patients with nephrolithiasis, who choose to stay home, may suffer serious complications such as obstructive uropathy, deterioration of renal function, sepsis, and death. We present such a case that led to renal failure and necessitated emergent urologic intervention. Case Presentation: A 60-year-old Caucasian man presented with right flank pain, dizziness, and dyspnea at the emergency room. History was significant for a previous diagnosis of right renal pelvic stone that was scheduled for retrograde intrarenal surgery before the pandemic lockdown. Upon evaluation, he was found to have an elevated creatinine of 40.2 mg/dL, bilateral hydronephrosis, pericardial and pleural effusion. The patient underwent emergency hemodialysis, followed by preliminary bilateral percutaneous nephrostomy, and subsequently by ureteral stenting. He was discharged stable with the future plan for endoscopic stone management. Conclusions: In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, urologists should follow up all known kidney stone patients, regularly assess their condition, and prioritize those who need urgent care. Patient education and telemedicine are useful tools for this purpose and may help minimize the risk of complications during a community lockdown.

Introduction: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold-standard for the treatment of benign prostate enlargement (BPE) associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), after failure of conservative therapy. At present, only resection-rate (grams of prostate resected over time) is regarded as an efficiency parameter to evaluate the skill of the operator and to assess the outcome of the procedure. Materials and methods: Five surgeons performed TURP using a Gyrus-type bipolar system in 123 patients with BPE/LUTS who came to our observation from June 2016 to December 2019. The amount of irrigation fluid used during the procedure was registered and correlated to the operating time, resection-rate, prostate adenoma weight, post-operative bladder irrigation time, intraoperative bleeding and days of catheterization. Results: We found an inverse correlation between the amount of irrigation fluid used during TURP and the resection-rate recorded for all operators, according to Spearman's Correlation (r = -0.78, p = 0.002); a direct correlation was also found between the amount of irrigation fluid and the adenoma weight. Finally, we also found a direct correlation with intraoperative bleeding and the duration and amount of bladder irrigation during and after TURP. Conclusions: The amount of irrigation fluid used is proposed as a reliable parameter to estimate the efficiency of the endoscopic procedure as well to assess the skill of the operator and shortterm results. The observed data encourage the possibility of applying this new efficiency indicator to all endoscopic maneuvers.

Introduction: Radiotherapy is a common treatment for prostate cancer, and can be administered in various ways, including 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy. During treatment the gastrointestinal tract may be exposed to radiation and the rectal wall may be exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation, which can lead to rectal bleeding, ulcers or fistulas, and an increased risk of rectum cancer. Various strategies to minimize these complications have been developed in the last decade; one of the most promising is to use a rectal balloon to fixate the prostate gland during treatment or to inject biodegradable spacers between the prostate and rectum to reduce the rectal dose of radiation. Aim of our paper is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of spacers implantation. Materials and methods: From January 2021 to June 2022 all patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer with unfavorable/ intermediate risk - poor prognosis and programmed hypofractionated radiation therapy were enrolled. In all patients biodegradable balloons spacers were placed posteriorly to the prostate to increase the separation between prostate and rectum. The duration of the procedure, observation time, the appearance of early and late complications and their severity (according to Charlson comorbidity index) and tolerability of the device were recorded at the time of positioning and after 10 days. Results: 25 patients were enrolled in our study. Two patients (8%) underwent acute urine retention resolved with catheterization and one patient (4%) developed a mild perineal hematoma that did not require any treatment. As regards late complications 1 patient (4%) developed hyperpyrexia (> 38°C) the day after the procedure requiring continuation of antibiotic regimen. At T1 visit we recorded no medium-high grade complications. As for the tolerability of the device, it was optimal with no perineal discomfort or alterations of bowel function. Conclusions: Biodegradable balloon spacers appears to be safe and well tolerated and its positioning does not present any technical difficulties or risks of major complications.

Pelvikperinoloji A Multidisciplinary Pelvik Floor Journal