Sebastian Thöns

Prof. Dr. Sebastian Thöns

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 February 2016 in Wind Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Evangelos I. KatsanosEvangelos I. Katsanos
Evangelos I. Katsanos
STSebastian Thöns
Sebastian Thöns
CGChristos Τ. Georgakis
Christos Τ. Georgakis

21 November 2017 in Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STSebastian Thöns
Sebastian Thöns
This article introduces an approach and framework for the quantification of the value of structural health monitoring (SHM) in the context of the structural risk and integrity management for systems. The quantification of the value of SHM builds upon the Bayesian decision and utility theory, which facilitates the assessment of the value of information associated with SHM. The principal approach for the quantification of the value of SHM is formulated by modeling the fundamental decision of performing SHM or not in conjunction with their expected utilities. The expected utilities are calculated accounting for the probabilistic performance of a system in conjunction with the associated structural integrity and risk management actions throughout the life cycle, the associated benefits, structural risks, and costs and when performing SHM, the SHM information, their probabilistic outcomes, and costs. The calculation of the expected utilities necessitates a comprehensive and rigorous modeling, which is introduced close to the original formulations and for which analysis characteristics and simplifications are described and derived. The framework provides the basis for the optimization of the structural risk and integrity management based on utility gains including or excluding SHM and inspection information. Studies of fatigue deteriorating structural systems and their characteristics (1) provide decision support for the performance of SHM, (2) explicate the influence of the structural component and system characteristics on the value of SHM, and (3) demonstrate how an integral optimization of SHM and inspection strategies for an efficient structural risk and integrity management can be performed.

1 April 2015 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wei-Hua HuWei-Hua Hu
Wei-Hua Hu
STSebastian Thöns
Sebastian Thöns
RRRolf Günter Rohrmann
Rolf Günter Rohrmann
SSSamir Said
Samir Said
WRWerner Rücker
Werner Rücker

1 September 2018 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YDYan Dong
Yan Dong
SMSimona Miraglia
Simona Miraglia
SMStefano Manzo
Stefano Manzo
SGStylianos Georgiadis
Stylianos Georgiadis
HSHjalte Jomo Danielsen Sørup
Hjalte Jomo Danielsen Sørup
MHMichael Z Hauschild
Michael Z Hauschild

1 April 2015 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wei-Hua HuWei-Hua Hu
Wei-Hua Hu
STSebastian Thöns
Sebastian Thöns
RRRolf Günter Rohrmann
Rolf Günter Rohrmann
SSSamir Said
Samir Said
WRWerner Rücker
Werner Rücker

1 January 2017 in Structural Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRonald Schneider
Ronald Schneider
STSebastian Thöns
Sebastian Thöns
DSDaniel Straub
Daniel Straub