Our study aimed to investigate whether radiomics on MRI sequences can differentiate responder (R) and non-responder (NR) patients based on the tumour regression grade (TRG) assigned after surgical resection in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Eighty-five patients undergoing primary staging with MRI were retrospectively evaluated, and 40 patients were finally selected. The ROIs were manually outlined in the tumour site on T2w sequences in the oblique-axial plane. Based on the TRG, patients were grouped as having either a complete or a partial response (TRG = (0,1), n = 15). NR patients had a minimal or poor nCRT response (TRG = (2,3), n = 25). Eighty-four local first-order radiomic features (RFs) were extracted from tumour ROIs. Only single RFs were investigated. Each feature was selected using univariate analysis guided by a one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum. ROC curve analysis was performed, using AUC computation and the Youden index (YI) for sensitivity and specificity. The RF measuring the heterogeneity of local skewness of T2w values from tumour ROIs differentiated Rs and NRs with a p-value ≈ 10⁻⁵; AUC = 0.90 (95%CI, 0.73–0.96); and YI = 0.68, corresponding to 80% sensitivity and 88% specificity. In conclusion, higher heterogeneity in skewness maps of the baseline tumour correlated with a greater benefit from nCRT.

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome is significantly associated with a deterioration in the quality of life, and its medical treatment is usually ineffective.OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to establish the efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in treating this syndrome.DESIGN: This is a randomized pilot trial with 1-year follow-up.SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a specialized colorectal unit of a tertiary hospital.PATIENTS: Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and low anterior rectal resection for cancer with low anterior resection syndrome score ≥21 and ileostomy closed at least 18 months earlier were included.INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation plus medical treatment (arm A, n = 6) or medical treatment (arm B, n = 6). Low anterior resection syndrome was assessed using symptom severity and disease-specific quality-of-life scores at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at 1-year follow-up.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a clinical response, defined as a reduction of the low anterior resection syndrome score.RESULTS: Only in group A low anterior resection syndrome score, fecal incontinence severity index, and obstructed defecation syndrome score improved significantly with treatment (35.8 ± 2.5 vs 29.0 ± 3.8 (p= 0.03); 36.8 ± 4.3 vs 18.5 ± 8.0 (p= 0.02); 10.3 ± 3.9 vs 8.0 ± 4.9 (p= 0.009)) and changes were observed in all domains of quality-of-life instruments. In both groups the symptom severity and quality-of-life scores at 1-year follow-up did not differ significantly from those recorded at the end of treatment.LIMITATIONS: The study had a small number of patients and it was underpowered to detect the within-group effect.CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation could be an effective treatment for low anterior resection syndrome. Additional studies are warranted to investigate clinical effectiveness in low anterior resection syndrome. SeeVideo Abstractat http://links.lww.com/DCR/B371.ESTUDIO PILOTO ALEATORIO DE ESTIMULACIÓN PERCUTÁNEA DEL NERVIO TIBIAL POSTERIOR VERSUS TERAPIA MÉDICA PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DEL SÍNDROME DE RESECCIÓN ANTERIOR BAJA: UN AÑO DE SEGUIMIENTO: ANTECEDENTES:El síndrome de resección anterior baja se asocia con un deterioro significativo en la calidad de vida y su tratamiento médico generalmente es ineficaz.OBJETIVO:El objetivo del presente estudio fue establecer la eficacia de la estimulación percutánea del nervio tibial en el tratamiento de este síndrome.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio piloto aleatorio con 1 año de seguimiento.ESCENARIO:El estudio se realizó en una unidad colorrectal especializada de un hospital terciario.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes que se sometieron a quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante y resección rectal anterior baja por cáncer con puntaje de síndrome de resección anterior baja ≥ 21 e ileostomía cerrada al menos 18 meses antes.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente para recibir estimulación percutánea del nervio tibial + tratamiento médico (brazo A, n = 6) o tratamiento médico (brazo B, n = 6). El síndrome de resección anterior baja se evaluó utilizando puntajes de la gravedad de los síntomas y de calidad de vida específicos de la enfermedad al inicio, al final del tratamiento y al año de seguimiento.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue una respuesta clínica, definida como una reducción de la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja.RESULTADOS:Solo en el grupo A, el puntaje del síndrome de resección anterior baja, el índice de severidad de incontinencia fecal y el puntaje del síndrome de defecación obstruida mejoraron significativamente con el tratamiento (35.8 ± 2.5 vs 29 ± 3.8,p= 0.03; 36.8 ± 4.3 vs 18.5 ± 8.0,p= 0.02; 10.3 ± 3.9 vs 8.0 ± 4.9,p= 0.009, respectivamente) y se observaron cambios en todos los dominios de los instrumentos de calidad de vida. En ambos grupos, los puntajes de severidad de los síntomas y de calidad de vida al año de seguimiento no difirieron significativamente de los registrados al final del tratamiento.LIMITACIONES:El estudio tuvo un pequeño número de pacientes y no logró suficiente poder para detectar el efecto dentro de grupo.CONCLUSIONES:La estimulación percutánea del nervio tibial podría ser un tratamiento efectivo para el síndrome de resección anterior baja. Se requieren estudios adicionales para investigar la efectividad clínica en el síndrome de resección anterior baja. ConsulteVideo Resumenhttp://links.lww.com/DCR/B371.

Background: Rectal cancer is a malignant neoplasm of the large intestine resulting from the uncontrolled proliferation of the rectal tract. Predicting the pathologic response of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy at an MRI primary staging scan in patients affected by locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) could lead to significant improvement in the survival and quality of life of the patients. In this study, the possibility of automatizing this estimation from a primary staging MRI scan, using a fully automated artificial intelligence-based model for the segmentation and consequent characterization of the tumor areas using radiomic features was evaluated. The TRG score was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. Methods: Forty-three patients under treatment in the IRCCS Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic were retrospectively selected for the study; a U-Net model was trained for the automated segmentation of the tumor areas; the radiomic features were collected and used to predict the tumor regression grade (TRG) score. Results: The segmentation of tumor areas outperformed the state-of-the-art results in terms of the Dice score coefficient or was comparable to them but with the advantage of considering mucinous cases. Analysis of the radiomic features extracted from the lesion areas allowed us to predict the TRG score, with the results agreeing with the state-of-the-art results. Conclusions: The results obtained regarding TRG prediction using the proposed fully automated pipeline prove its possible usage as a viable decision support system for radiologists in clinical practice.

Background/Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) performed using laparoscopy or using the Medtronic Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) system. Methods: This is a retrospective comparative single-center study of consecutive minimally invasive surgeries for CRC performed by two colorectal surgeons with extensive laparoscopic experience at the beginning of their robotic expertise. Patients were not selected for the surgical approach, but waiting lists and operating room availability determined whether the patients were in the robotic group or the laparoscopic group. The primary outcome was to compare 30-day postoperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification and the Complication Comprehensive Index (CCI). The secondary outcomes included operating times, conversion rates, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stays (LOS), readmission rates, and short-term oncologic outcomes, such as the R0 resection, the number of lymph nodes harvested, the total mesorectal excision (TME) quality, and the circumferential resection margin (CRM). Results: Of the 109 patients, 52 underwent robotic and 57 laparoscopic CRC surgery. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. There was no significant difference between the robotic and the laparoscopic groups regarding postoperative complications, the Clavien–Dindo classification, and the CCI. They also had similar operating times, conversion rates, intraoperative complications, LOSs, readmission rates, and short-term oncologic outcomes (the lymph nodes harvested, the R0 resection, TME quality, and CRM status). Conclusions: This study reports the largest cohort of CRC surgery performed using the Medtronic Hugo™ RAS system and is the first comparative study with laparoscopy. The perioperative and oncologic outcomes were similar, demonstrating that the Medtronic Hugo™ RAS system is safe and feasible for CRC as compared to laparoscopic surgery, even at the beginning of the robotic experience.