Background and Objectives: Oxidative stress induced by increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production plays an important role in carcinogenesis. The entire urinary tract is continuously exposed to numerous potentially mutagenic environmental agents which generate ROS during their biotransformation. In first line defense against free radicals, antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD2) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX1) both have essential roles. Altered enzyme activity and decreased ability of neutralizing free oxygen radicals as a consequence of genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding these two enzymes are well described so far. This study aimed to investigate the association of GPX1 (rs1050450) and SOD2 (rs4880) genetic variants with the urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) risk independently and in combination with smoking. Furthermore, we aimed to determine whether the UBC stage and pathological grade were influenced by GPX1 and SOD2 polymorphisms. Material and Methods: The study population included 330 patients with UBC (mean age 65 ± 10.3 years) and 227 respective controls (mean age 63.4 ± 7.9 years). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of GPX1 (rs1050450) was analyzed using the PCR-RFLP, while SOD2 (rs4880) SNP was analyzed using the q-PCR method. Results: Our results showed that UBC risk was significantly increased among carriers of at least one variant SOD2 Val allele compared to the SOD2 Ala16Ala homozygotes (OR = 1.55, p = 0.03). Moreover, this risk was even more pronounced in smokers with at least one variant SOD2 Val allele, since they have even 7.5 fold higher UBC risk (OR = 7.5, p < 0.001). Considering GPX1 polymorphism, we have not found an association with UBC risk. However, GPX1 genotypes distribution differed significantly according to the tumor stage (p ˂ 0.049) and pathohistological grade (p ˂ 0.018). Conclusion: We found that SOD2 genetic polymorphism is associated with the risk of UBC development independently and in combination with cigarette smoking. Furthermore, we showed that GPX1 genetic polymorphism is associated with the aggressiveness of the disease.

Considering the divergent biological behaviors of certain histological subtypes of urothelial carcinoma, it would be of great importance to examine the impact of variant histology and to predict its presence in patients with bladder cancer. A single-center cohort study included 459 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma between 2017 and 2021. Patients were followed up with until July 2022. We compared clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic characteristics and the overall survival between patients with pure urothelial carcinoma and variant histologies. Our results showed that the patients with variant histology were older and preoperatively more frequently had hydronephrosis and higher values of leukocytes and neutrophils. Also, we found a significant association between variant histology and an advanced stage of tumor disease, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, positive surgical margins, and metastases in surgically resected lymph nodes. The number of neutrophils was identified as an independent preoperative predictor of the presence of variant histology after a radical cystectomy. The overall survival of the patients with variant histology was significantly lower compared to the patients with pure urothelial carcinoma. According to our results, the presence of variant histology represents a more aggressive form of the disease. Preoperative neutrophil counts may indicate the presence of variant histology of urothelial carcinoma in patients with bladder cancer.

At the time when mass COVID-19 vaccination began, providing appropriate vaccination advice to uro-oncology patients became a challenge. This was a single-center cross-sectional observational study aimed to investigate the rate of COVID-19 vaccination among uro-oncology patients receiving systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Furthermore, we aimed to assess patients’ attitudes and identify factors influencing their decision to vaccinate against COVID-19. Data on patients’ sociodemographic characteristics, vaccination status, and awareness and attitudes about COVID-19 vaccination were collected from questionnaires completed by the patients. A total of 173 patients were enrolled in this study, and 124 (71.7%) of them completed the COVID-19 vaccination. Significantly higher vaccination rates were found in male patients, and also in older patients, highly educated patients, and those who lived with one household member. Furthermore, we found significantly higher vaccination rates in patients who had consulted with doctors involved in their treatment, particularly with urologists. A significant association was observed between COVID-19 vaccination and doctor’s advice, family member influence, and personal beliefs toward the vaccination. Our study showed multiple associations of patients’ sociodemographic characteristics with vaccination rates. Furthermore, consultation with doctors who are particularly involved in oncology treatment and advice received from them were associated with significantly higher vaccination rates among uro-oncology patients.

Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies in men, posing a significant public health challenge due to its high incidence and long-term treatment-related toxicities. Long-lived patients often experience prolonged side effects that can severely diminish their quality of life. Despite advancements in radiotherapy techniques like IMRT and VMAT, some patients still experience acute and late side effects. Current treatment protocols do not account for individual variability in normal-tissue radiosensitivity, highlighting the need for predictive tools and a personalised treatment approach. Genetic factors and molecular regulators like microRNAs (miRNAs) contribute to these variations by influencing DNA repair, inflammation, and apoptosis. This review explores potential biomarkers of radiotoxicity, focusing on immune-related factors such as IL-6 and TGF-β1, SNPs influencing radiosensitivity, miRNAs involved in radiation responses, and functional assays including the radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis (RILA) test. These approaches offer promising tools for identifying radiosensitive patients and enabling risk-adapted radiotherapy.

Background: The emerging new standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC) becomes a challenge when access to new drugs is limited. In Serbia, sunitinib and pazopanib are the only available first-line therapies. The second-line treatment for mRCC has never been and is still not available. We aimed to assess overall survival (OS) in patients with mRCC who received first-line sunitinib or pazopanib when access to second-line treatment was not available. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed data from a nationally representative cohort of 759 patients who started on first-line sunitinib or pazopanib between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2019, in 4 centers in Serbia. The data cut-off date was 31 December 2019. Key eligibility criteria were clear cell RCC histology, measurable metastatic disease, performance status 0 or 1, and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center favorable or intermediate prognosis. The primary outcome was OS from the start of first-line treatment to death or data cut-off date. Results: The study population included 759 patients with mRCC who started with first-line sunitinib (n = 673; [88.7%]) or pazopanib (n = 86; [11.3%]). Overall, the mean age was 61.0 ± 9.7 years at treatment baseline, and 547 (72%) were men. mRCC was primarily diagnosed in 230 (30%) patients, and most of them underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to systemic therapy (n = 181 [79%]). Additional treatment of metastases prior to and/or during treatment was used in 169 patients (22.3%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 168 (22.1%) and 47 patients (6.2%), respectively, and treatment was permanently stopped because of toxicity in 41 (6.9%). The OS was calculated from the start of first-line treatment, and the median follow-up was 14 months (range, 0–97). The median OS in the entire cohort was 17 months (95% CI, 14.6–19.4). Conclusions: With only available sunitinib and pazopanib in first-line treatment, modest improvements are seen in the overall survival of patients with mRCC in real world clinical practice. In circumstances of limited availability of cancer medicines, our results can contribute to accelerating patient access to novel cancer therapies that have been shown to prolong survival in mRCC.