Background: Physical fitness (PF) is an expression of the physiological functioning of multiple body components. PF is an important prognostic factor in terms of cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality. PF has been related to some biomarkers in the general population but not in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Purpose: To evaluate the effects of PF on biomarkers potentially related to physical activity (PA) in a sample of BCS. Methods: Cross-sectional study. A total of 84 BCS (mean age 54) who had finished their treatment were recruited. Different components of PF were evaluated, namely body composition (anthropometry), cardiorespiratory fitness (one-mile walk test), muscular (handgrip and sit-to-stand timed test), and motor (gait speed) components. Sexual hormones, inflammation, and insulin resistance biomarkers were measured. Results: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) was associated with every component of physical fitness: cardiorespiratory fitness (p-value = 0.002), muscular (sit-to-stand timed test, p-value = 0.002) and motor (gait speed, p-value = 0.004) components, and body composition (body mass index, p-value = 0.003; waist, p-value < 0.000; and waist-to-hip index, p-value = 0.012). CRP also was associated with “poor physical condition,” a constructed variable that encompasses all components of physical fitness (p-value < 0.001). Insulin was associated with cardiorespiratory fitness and gait speed (p-values = 0.002 and 0.024, respectively). Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 was negatively associated with waist perimeter and waist-to-hip ratio. Conclusions: CRP can also be considered an indicator of poor PF in BCS. Implications for cancer survivors: in case of elevation of CRP indicating cardiovascular risk, health professionals should recommend lifestyle changes to improve BCS physical condition.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Despite most cases being diagnosed in the early stages, patients typically require a multimodal treatment approach. This typically involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments (including chemotherapy or immunotherapy), targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, depending on the disease subtype and the risk of recurrence. Moreover, patients with BC and germline mutations in the breast cancer genes 1 or 2 (BRCA1/BRCA2), (gBRCAm), who are typically young women, often require more aggressive therapeutic interventions. These mutations present unique characteristics that necessitate a distinct treatment approach, potentially influencing the side effect profiles of patients with BC. Regardless of the clear benefit observed with these treatments in terms of reduced recurrence and mortality rates, long-term, treatment-related adverse events occur that negatively affect the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of BC survivors. Thus, long-term adverse events need to be factored into the treatment decision algorithm of patients with early BC (eBC). Physical, functional, emotional, and psychosocial adverse events can occur and represent a significant concern and a challenge for clinicians, patients, and their families. This review article provides an overview of the various long-term adverse events that patients with eBC may experience, including their associated risk factors, as well as management and prevention strategies. We also explore the evidence of the long-term impact of treatment on the HRQoL of patients with gBRCAm. By providing a comprehensive overview of current evidence and recommendations regarding patients’ HRQoL, we aim to equip clinicians with scientific and clinical knowledge and provide guidance to optimize care and improve long-term outcomes.

The treatment of choice for patients with early stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) has been extended field or subtotal nodal irradiation. Remission rates of over 95% have been obtained, however, about 5% of stage I and II patients will suffer from progressive disease while on therapy and an additional 15-20% will relapse. Chemotherapy (Ch) alone has not been adequately tested in early-stage HD. In this study, all HD stage I and II patients treated with Ch alone in the University Hospital "Clínica Puerta de Hierro" between 1980 and 1997 were reviewed. Thirty-five patients were treated between 04/80 and 12/97. All patients achieved complete remission. The median follow-up was 119 months (range 21-240 months), no patients were lost at follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was 97% (IC 95%, 92-100) at 5 years and 88% (IC 95%, 75-100) at 10 years. Failure free survival (FFS) was 93% (IC 95%, 83-100) at 5 years and 66% (IC 95%, 47-86) at 10 years. Three (8.5%) patients died: two due to a second tumour (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and myeloid acute leukaemia) and the other due to sepsis post-Ch. Univariate and multivariate analysis only associated histology subtype relative risk (RR) 4.0 nodular sclerosis (95% IC, 1.0-5.5; p :0.02) with higher relapse. Other prognostic factors did not reveal significant differences with respect to failure free or OS. In conclusion, we believe that death from HD in early-stage patients is unusual and mortality from causes other than HD occurs many years later. Outside clinical trials due to the lack of clear prognostic factors, with the exception of specific situations, patients should be informed of all the possible alternatives as well as the consequences of the treatments employed. In our experience, it appears that using Ch alone in the initial stages does not jeopardize overall patient survival, with similar results being achieved.