(1) Background: The present review aims to identify risk factors with predictive value for differentiating between pseudoexfoliation patients at risk of developing intra- or postoperative complications and those without operative risk during cataract surgery. (2) Methods: The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO, registration no. CRD42023417721. The following databases were searched for studies between 2000 and 2023: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Springer, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, TRIP database, LILACS, Clinical Trials, and reference lists of articles. We included analytical studies of any design examining cataract surgery complications in pseudoexfoliation patients across two population groups, one who underwent uneventful cataract surgery and the other who experienced intra- or postoperative complications. The paper will follow PRISMA 2020 criteria for reporting. Effect measure was assessed using odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for qualitative variables and means with their respective standard deviation (SD) for quantitative variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the method presented in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The GRADE scale was used for quality of evidence and certainty. (3) Results: The initial search of published and gray literature databases retrieved 1435 articles, six of which were included in this report. A total of 156 intra- or postoperative incidents were reported in 999 eyes with pseudoexfoliation. The identified predictive factors were a shallow anterior chamber, cataract grade, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, preoperative intraocular pressure, and symmetry of the exfoliation material. Limitations include heterogeneity of data and limited number of studies identified in our search. (4) Conclusions: These findings suggest the potential to refine risk stratification protocols in clinical settings and assist surgeons in personalized decision-making among individuals with pseudoexfoliation syndrome.
Background: Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) is a common age-related ocular condition characterized by the accumulation of a fibrillar, pseudoexfoliative material on the anterior segment of the eye. This study aims to investigate the histopathological characteristics of pseudoexfoliative material within different ocular structures, including the eyelid, conjunctiva, and anterior lens capsule. Methods: A total of 32 anterior lens capsules, 3 eyelid fragments, and 12 conjunctival specimens were obtained from patients clinically diagnosed with PEX during ocular surgeries at the Onioptic Hospital of Ophthalmology. The tissue specimens were subsequently processed using the classical histological technique of paraffin embedding. This process enabled the production of serial sections with a thickness of 4 microns, facilitating the microscopic examination of fine details. The sections were stained with the hematoxylin-eosin (HE) method for the observation of microscopic structures. Results: This study’s findings reveal that PEX material, characterized by its fibrillar and amorphous components, is consistently present across multiple ocular structures, including the anterior lens capsule, eyelid, and conjunctiva. When stained with H&E, the PEX material typically appears as amorphous, eosinophilic deposits. Under higher magnification, these deposits exhibit a fibrillar structure, often appearing as irregular, granular, or filamentous aggregates. Conclusions: The deposit of fibrillar material in the eyelid and conjunctiva, though less commonly emphasized compared to other structures, is a significant finding that sheds light on the systemic nature of the syndrome. The consistent identification of fibrillar eosinophilic deposits across these structures highlights the systemic distribution of PEX material, reinforcing the notion that PEX syndrome is not confined to the anterior segment of the eye.
Background: This study aims to evaluate the visual performance, both quantitative and qualitative, of the novel non-diffractive extended monofocal intraocular lens (Evolux, Sifi) following cataract surgery. This serves as a preliminary study to assess its feasibility and improve the research methodology. Methods: We conducted a single-arm, non-randomized, retrospective study at Onioptic Hospital, Craiova, Romania, involving patients who underwent cataract surgery from November 2022 to August 2023. The following visual parameters were evaluated 3 months postoperatively: monocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity at 4 m; uncorrected (UIVA) and distance-corrected (DCIVA) intermediate visual acuity at 60 cm; uncorrected (UNVA) and distance-corrected (DCNVA) near visual acuity at 40cm; postoperative refraction expressed as spheric equivalent (SE) and Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire scores. The contrast sensitivity and defocus curve were evaluated 1 month postoperation in 22 patients who underwent surgery in both eyes. SPSS Statistics 26.0 was used for statistical analysis, employing percentages, standard deviations (SDs), and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: Among the 103 eyes from 81 patients (mean age of 68.7 ± 1.845), 64% achieved an UDVA of logMAR 0.1 or better, and 91.26% achieved a CDVA of logMAR 0.1 or better at 3 months. Additionally, 83.24% of the eyes exhibited a UIVA of logMAR 0.3 or better, and 60.19% attained an UNVA of logMAR 0.3 or better. The SE was within ±0.50 D in 77.76% of the eyes. The QoV mean scores were as follows: frequency = 30.20 ± 16; severity = 17.19 ± 12.45; bothersome = 15.45 ± 12.94. Conclusions: The Evolux IOL demonstrated very good biometric predictability and excellent distance visual performance and very good intermediate vision, with no photopic side effects or glare in our sample population. This study provides a strong foundation for a larger comparative study with an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL, incorporating contrast sensitivity and defocus curve assessments to enhance the research quality.
31 March 2022 in Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology
Objective: The aim of this report was to present a rare case of apparently unilateral Peters anomaly and describe the clinical characteristics, surgical approach, and visual prognosis. Methods: We presented the case of a 7-year-old female patient with posterior corneal defect due to kerato-lenticular adhesions along with anterior dislocation and opacification of the lens in the left eye and a history of post-traumatic evisceration of the right eye. Systemic associations included mental underdevelopment, left torticollis and scoliosis. No family history of acquired or inherited diseases were determined. We performed cataract extraction in the left eye and opted for aphakia. Results: Based on clinical findings, we considered unilateral Peters anomaly type II. Cataract surgery slightly improved the visual acuity from hand moving to 20/ 400 UCVA (uncorrected visual acuity) and 20/ 100 with +10.0 diopters at 1 month postoperative. No enlargement of the corneal opacity was observed. Conclusions: In this case, we were able to diagnose Peters anomaly only in one eye. The diagnosis required long follow-up with periodic measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) to early detect glaucoma. The complexity and uniqueness of the case relied on the difficult approach made by the cloudy cornea and anterior lens dislocation. We applied a combination of techniques including adhesiolysis, cataract extraction and anterior vitrectomy. Further interventions such as secondary IOL (intraocular lens) implantation or PKP (penetrating keratoplasty) will be taken into consideration after six-month and one-year postoperative follow-up. Abbreviations: PA = Peters anomaly, DM = Descemet's membrane, IOL = intraocular lens, VA = visual acuity, OVDs = ophthalmic viscosurgical devices, IOP = intraocular pression, PKP = penetrating keratoplasty, BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, UCVA = uncorrected visual acuity.