Qilong Shao

Mr. Qilong Shao

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2023 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QSQilong Shao
Qilong Shao
LPLi peng
Li peng
YLYichan Liu
Yichan Liu
YLYongchang Li
Yongchang Li
Urban areas are human–environmental systems that rely heavily on ecosystems for long-term sustainability, and ecosystems and their components are essential to city life. Previous reviews have drawn a range of conclusions relevant to the future analysis and implementation of ecological and facility assessments. Overall, however, there is still a need to develop more systematic methods to comprehensively assess and evaluate urban ecosystem services (UES) in a temporal dimension for use in both historical monitoring studies and prospective research. Using CiteSpace, this study assessed the history and current state of UES research from multiple angles, as well as identified research structures and emerging trends in this field. The main findings are as follows: (i) The study of UES can be divided into three distinct but interconnected stages: preparation, rise, and prosperity. There are substantial prospects for UES research to develop worldwide collaborative networks, since it is increasingly expanding from domains focused on ecological or environmental science to those that draw from a wider range of disciplines. (ii) UES has evolved slowly from large-scale research to more focused, smaller-scale studies. Research on the subject of UES focuses primarily on two primary areas: land-use change and the development of green infrastructure. (iii) Sustainability in cities is currently a hot issue, and an important area of this study is the role that urban ecosystem services plays in ensuring residents’ health and happiness.

21 June 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYuntao Lian
Yuntao Lian
QSQilong Shao
Qilong Shao
XSXiaofeng Shao
Xiaofeng Shao
ZZZunling Zhu
Zunling Zhu
Multimodal artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) is reshaping museum digital exhibitions through dynamic content generation, contextual storytelling, and interactive feedback. Despite its growing adoption, the impact of AIGC’s experiential attributes on visitors’ digital exhibition experience intention remains underexplored. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study develops an integrative framework incorporating AIGC technology acceptance, perceived immersion, content creativity, interaction quality, cognitive evaluations, and affective responses. Data were collected from 481 visitors with prior digital exhibition experience and analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results indicate that AIGC technology acceptance significantly influences perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and digital exhibition experience intention; interaction quality enhances usability and exerts a direct effect on intention; and immersion and content creativity primarily shape intention through perceived enjoyment while also exhibiting direct effects. These findings extend TAM to multimodal AIGC-enabled museum contexts and provide empirical evidence to guide the design of culturally meaningful, interactive, and engaging digital exhibition experiences.

5 June 2026 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QSQilong Shao
Qilong Shao
YLYuntao Lian
Yuntao Lian
YZYueru Zhu
Yueru Zhu
YLYongchang Li
Yongchang Li
Urban wetlands serve as vital spatial platforms for ecological restoration, carbon sequestration enhancement, and public environmental education; however, systematic research on their carbon sequestration benefits and the mechanisms linking these benefits to spatial design and public participation remains limited. Taking Nanjing Yuzui Wetland Park as a case study, this paper conducts a comprehensive assessment of plant community carbon sequestration benefits, spatial structural variations, and public ecological awareness by integrating official tree species data, field measurement data, the i-Tree Eco model, and questionnaire surveys. The results indicate that Yuzui Wetland Park already possesses a solid foundation for carbon sequestration, with a total carbon sequestration benefit of $48,777.38 and an average carbon sequestration benefit per tree of $24.63. Salix babylonica and Ulmus pumila L. are the primary contributors to current carbon sequestration, while Ginkgo biloba demonstrate strong long-term carbon storage potential, suggesting a clear division of labor among different tree species in short-term carbon fixation and long-term carbon storage. At the same time, significant differences exist between the native areas within the wetland and the peripheral roadside areas in terms of tree species composition, community structure, and carbon sequestration performance, indicating that spatial zoning is a key factor influencing the carbon sequestration benefits of urban wetlands. By integrating i-Tree Eco-based carbon assessment with questionnaire data, this study identifies a perceptual gap between the carbon-sink performance of Yuzui Wetland Park and public recognition of its ecological functions. The model results show measurable carbon-sequestration benefits and differentiated contribution patterns among tree species: Salix babylonica and Ulmus pumila L. contribute mainly to current carbon storage, while Ginkgo biloba shows long-term carbon-storage potential. The questionnaire results indicate that respondents recognized the wetland primarily through recreational and landscape functions, with lower recognition of carbon sequestration and water purification. These findings provide the basis for translating carbon-sink assessment into spatial visualization, environmental interpretation, and participatory landscape design. The study indicates that the optimization of urban wetlands should not be limited to plant selection and ecological calculations but should further integrate carbon sink assessment with spatial design and public participation to enhance the perceptibility, communicability, and practicability of wetland ecological value.