Habitat use and the temporal activities of wildlife can be largely modified by livestock encroachment. Therefore, identifying the potential impacts of livestock on the predator–prey interactions could provide essential information for wildlife conservation and management. From May to October 2017, we used camera trapping technology to investigate fine-scale spatiotemporal interactions in a predator–prey system with the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) as a common mesopredator, and its prey with contrasting activity patterns (i.e., nocturnal rats and diurnal squirrels) in a livestock-dominated nature reserve in Northern China. We found that the prey species showed different habitat preferences with the leopard cats. The nocturnal rats had strong positive effects on the site-use of the leopard cats, while the influence of livestock on the diurnal squirrels’ site-use changed from strong positive effects to weak effects as the livestock disturbance increased. The temporal overlap between the leopard cats and the nocturnal rats was almost four times that of the leopard cats and the diurnal squirrels, regardless of the livestock disturbance. Our study demonstrated that the fine-scale spatiotemporal use patterns of the leopard cats were consistent and highly correlated with the nocturnal rats under livestock disturbance. We suggest that appropriate restrictions on livestock disturbance should be implemented by reserve managers to reduce the threat to wildlife and achieve multi-species coexistence.

Despite growing evidence of the widespread impacts of human activities on carnivores and their prey, it remains unclear how different types and intensities of human disturbance reshape predator–prey interactions. In this study, we conducted a systematic camera-trapping survey on a threatened carnivore, the small Indian civet (Viverricula indica). This species forages on prey with contrasting diel patterns, including nocturnal rats and diurnal species such as Pallas’s squirrel (Callosciurus erythraeus) and Chinese bamboo partridge (Bambusicola thoracica) in the southern Wuyi Mountains of southeastern China. Based on data from an extensive sampling effort (60,901 trap days at 180 camera stations), we used kernel density estimation and Pianka’s index to examine whether and how different types and intensities of human activity (human presence, roads, and settlements), as well as diverse altitudes and different seasons, affect the spatiotemporal interactions between small Indian civets and their potential prey. We found that all studied species adjusted their activity patterns, either advancing or delaying their peaks, to achieve temporal segregation under varying types and intensities of human disturbance and different altitudes and seasons. At the temporal scale, interactions between small Indian civets and their potential prey supported the human shield hypothesis, suggesting that increased human disturbance provides diurnal prey with refuge from predation pressure. Conversely, at both spatial and spatiotemporal scales, higher levels of human disturbance increased the overlap between small Indian civets and their prey species. These findings highlight that human impacts on wildlife interactions are scale-dependent: temporal refuge for prey does not necessarily reduce spatial or spatiotemporal overlap, which may still increase encounter rates and predation risk. Because our sampling relied on ground-level cameras, our inferences are limited to terrestrial interactions; arboreal interactions remain unquantified and require combined ground–canopy sampling in future work. Effective conservation management thus requires considering these scale-dependent effects of human activities on wildlife interactions.