In this study, we investigate the underlying origin of the high performance of PM6:Y6 organic solar cells.

A comparison of the efficiency, stability, and photophysics of organic solar cells employing poly[(5,6‐difluoro‐2,1,3‐benzothiadiazol‐4,7‐diyl)‐alt‐(3,3′″‐di(2‐octyldodecyl)‐2,2′;5′,2″;5″,2′″‐quaterthiophen‐5,5′″‐diyl)] (PffBT4T‐2OD) as a donor polymer blended with either the nonfullerene acceptor EH‐IDTBR or the fullerene derivative, [6,6]‐phenyl C₇₁ butyric acid methyl ester (PC₇₁BM) as electron acceptors is reported. Inverted PffBT4T‐2OD:EH‐IDTBR blend solar cell fabricated without any processing additive achieves power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 9.5 ± 0.2%. The devices exhibit a high open circuit voltage of 1.08 ± 0.01 V, attributed to the high lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level of EH‐IDTBR. Photoluminescence quenching and transient absorption data are employed to elucidate the ultrafast kinetics and efficiencies of charge separation in both blends, with PffBT4T‐2OD exciton diffusion kinetics within polymer domains, and geminate recombination losses following exciton separation being identified as key factors determining the efficiency of photocurrent generation. Remarkably, while encapsulated PffBT4T‐2OD:PC₇₁BM solar cells show significant efficiency loss under simulated solar irradiation (“burn in” degradation) due to the trap‐assisted recombination through increased photoinduced trap states, PffBT4T‐2OD:EH‐IDTBR solar cell shows negligible burn in efficiency loss. Furthermore, PffBT4T‐2OD:EH‐IDTBR solar cells are found to be substantially more stable under 85 °C thermal stress than PffBT4T‐2OD:PC₇₁BM devices.

This review surveyed the charge behavior in organic photocatalysis, and elucidated a correlation between molecular structure, charge dynamics and photocatalytic performance.

The charge carrier dynamics in organic solar cells and organic–inorganic hybrid metal halide perovskite solar cells, two leading technologies in thin‐film photovoltaics, are compared. The similarities and differences in charge generation, charge separation, charge transport, charge collection, and charge recombination in these two technologies are discussed, linking these back to the intrinsic material properties of organic and perovskite semiconductors, and how these factors impact on photovoltaic device performance is elucidated. In particular, the impact of exciton binding energy, charge transfer states, bimolecular recombination, charge carrier transport, sub‐bandgap tail states, and surface recombination is evaluated, and the lessons learned from transient optical and optoelectronic measurements are discussed. This perspective thus highlights the key factors limiting device performance and rationalizes similarities and differences in design requirements between organic and perovskite solar cells.

We analyse organic solar cells with four different photoactive blends exhibiting differing dependencies of short-circuit current upon photoactive layer thickness. These blends and devices are analysed by transient optoelectronic techniques of carrier kinetics and densities, air photoemission spectroscopy of material energetics, Kelvin probe measurements of work function, Mott-Schottky analyses of apparent doping density and by device modelling. We conclude that, for the device series studied, the photocurrent loss with thick active layers is primarily associated with the accumulation of photo-generated charge carriers in intra-bandgap tail states. This charge accumulation screens the device internal electrical field, preventing efficient charge collection. Purification of one studied donor polymer is observed to reduce tail state distribution and density and increase the maximal photoactive thickness for efficient operation. Our work suggests that selecting organic photoactive layers with a narrow distribution of tail states is a key requirement for the fabrication of efficient, high photocurrent, thick organic solar cells.