Jeanette Källstrand

Dr. Jeanette Källstrand

School of health and welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Halland, Sweden
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 January 2009 in Journal of Clinical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJeanette Källstrand
Jeanette Källstrand
CHCathrine Hildingh
Cathrine Hildingh

14 February 2020 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ICImpact within the Swedish framework for “Health Research in Collaboration”
Impact within the Swedish framework for “Health Research in Collaboration”
ULU. Lindmark
U. Lindmark
IAInger Ahlstrand
Inger Ahlstrand
AEA. Ekman
A. Ekman
LBL. Berg
L. Berg
ILIngrid Larsson
Ingrid Larsson
Background: The World Health Organization has highlighted the importance of health promotion for health service providers in order to ensure sustainable working life for individuals involved in providing health services. Such sustainability begins when students are preparing to manage their own future health and welfare in working life. It has been suggested that universities, employees and trainee health professionals should adopt or follow a salutogenic approach that not only complements the providing of information on known health risks but also favors health promotion strategies. This paper describes the study design and data collection methods in a planned study aiming to explore health-promoting factors for a sustainable working life among students in higher education within healthcare and social work. Methods: This protocol describes a multicenter longitudinal study involving Swedish students on higher education programs in the healthcare and social work sectors. In 2018, the study invited students on seven education programs at six universities to participate. These programs were for qualification as: biomedical laboratory scientists (n = 121); dental hygienists (n = 87); nurses (n = 1411); occupational therapists (n = 111); physiotherapists (n = 48); radiographers (n = 60); and, social workers (n = 443). In total, 2283 students were invited to participate. Participants completed a baseline, a self-reported questionnaire including six validated instruments measuring health-promoting factors and processes. There are to be five follow-up questionnaires. Three while the students are studying, one a year after graduating, and one three years after graduating. Each questionnaire captures different health-promoting dimensions, namely: health-promoting resources (i.e. sense of coherence); occupational balance; emotional intelligence; health and welfare; social interaction; and work and workplace experiences/perceptions. Discussion: This study focuses on the vastly important aspect of promoting a sustainable working life for healthcare and social work employees. In contrast to previous studies in this area, the present study uses different, validated instruments in health promotion, taking a salutogenic approach. It is hoped that, by stimulating the implementation of new strategies, the study’s findings will lead to education programs that prepare students better for a sustainable working life in healthcare and social work.

30 July 2012 in Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJeanette Källstrand
Jeanette Källstrand
ABAmir Baigi
Amir Baigi
NBNina Buer
Nina Buer
CHCathrine Hildingh
Cathrine Hildingh

30 October 2019 in Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LPLotta Pham
Lotta Pham
MAMaria Arnby
Maria Arnby
IBInger Benkel
Inger Benkel
PJPatrik Dahlqvist Jonsson
Patrik Dahlqvist Jonsson
JKJeanette Källstrand
Jeanette Källstrand
KZKristina Ziegert
Kristina Ziegert

22 January 2024 in BMC Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJeanette Källstrand
Jeanette Källstrand
ELEva-Carin Lindgren
Eva-Carin Lindgren
ICIng-Marie Carlsson
Ing-Marie Carlsson
Background: Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) is an eye disease associated with age that causes progressive and irreversible loss of central vision, while the peripheral visual ability remains. The occurrence of and especially late AMD is estimated to increase extensively to 2040 among persons aged ≥ 65 in Scandinavia, due to an increasing aging population. Objectives: The present study explored what it means to live with AMD through the eyes of those living with the condition. Methods: This is an explorative interview study. People who were ≥ 65 years old, living in their own homes, and diagnosed with advanced dry AMD in one or both eyes, causing a visual acuity of no more than 0.3 or worse in the best eye, were invited to participate in the study. The method chosen was the constructivist grounded theory, where reality is seen as fundamentally social and processual and a way of accessing the participants’ experiences, thoughts, and feelings. Results: In total, 12 interviews were conducted. Living with dry AMD confronted different problems and challenges. The substantive theory, Perpetuating ability to live life as usual, is characterised by a desire to continue life as usual, which requires an acceptance of the disease’s progress, self-acceptance of the new me, and an acceptance that the new life needs to be lived a little more carefully. Moreover, the participants used three strategies to resolve their main concern by maintaining an everyday life 1) Navigating the new normal, 2) Trusting own ability, and 3) Interdepending. Conclusion: Maintaining an everyday life is the primary concern among people with AMD. In supporting self-care, gaining information about the subjective experience to support their everyday living is of the utmost importance. This grounded theory captures valuable knowledge of how the older adults resolved their main concern “you got to keep on” despite their affected vision by “facing the fact” live life as usual since since life goes on. Our study also gives rise both to implications for research and practice in order to strengthen older people with AMD facing their future challenges. Trial registration: The Swedish Ethical Review Authority (EPN 2021/02877).

1 January 2016 in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJeanette Källstrand
Jeanette Källstrand
CHCathrine Hildingh
Cathrine Hildingh
NBNina Buer
Nina Buer
HTHans Thulesius
Hans Thulesius
The purpose of this classic grounded theory study was to understand how seniors who are living independently resolve issues influenced by visual impairment and high fall risk. We interviewed and observed 13 seniors with visual impairment in their homes. We also interviewed six visual instructors with experience from many hundreds of relevant incidents from the same group of seniors. We found that the seniors are resolving their main concern of “remaining themselves as who they used to be” by self-preservation. Within this category, the strategies maintaining the established self and defying deterioration emerged as the most prominent in our data. The theme maintaining the established self is mostly guided by change inertia and includes living the past (retaining past activities, reminiscing, and keeping the home intact) and facading (hiding impairment, leading to avoidance of becoming a burden and to risk juggling). Defying deterioration is a proactive scheme and involves moving (by exercising, adapting activities, using walking aids, driving), adapting (by finding new ways), and networking by sustaining old support networks or finding new networks. Self-preservation is generic human behavior and modifying this theory to other fields may therefore be worthwhile. In addition, health care providers may have use for the theory in fall preventive planning.