Given the relevant role of the extracellular microenvironment in regulating tissue homeostasis, is testicular bacterial microbiome (BM) associated with germ cell aplasia in idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (iNOA)? A steady increase of dysbiosis was observed among testis with normal spermatogenesis vs. iNOA with positive sperm retrieval and iNOA with complete germ cell aplasia. Tissue-associated BM has been reported to be a biologically important extracellular microenvironment component for numerous body habitats, but not yet for the human testis. Cross-sectional study, investigating tissue-associated BM in the testis of (i) five men with iNOA and negative sperm retrieval at microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE); (ii) five men with iNOA and positive sperm retrieval at microTESE; and (iii) five normozoospermic men upon orchiectomy. Every testicular specimen was histologically classified and analyzed in terms of bacterial community. Massive ultra-deep pyrosequencing was applied to investigate testis microbiome. Metagenome was analyzed using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME). Tissue-associated bacterial load was quantified by digital droplet PCR. Normozoospermic men showed small amounts of bacteria in the testis, with Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes Proteobacteria as the dominating phyla; iNOA individuals had increased amounts of bacterial DNA (P = 0.02), associated with decreased taxa richness due to the lack of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria (P = 2 × 10⁻⁵). Specimens with negative sperm retrieval at microTESE depicted complete germ cell aplasia and a further decrease in terms of Firmicutes and Clostridia (P < 0.05), a complete lack of Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus, but increased amount of Actinobacteria. The limited number of specimens analyzed in this preliminary study deserves external validation. The paraneoplastic microenvironment could have an impact on the residential bacterial flora. Human testicular microenvironment is not microbiologically sterile, containing low amounts of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. A dysbiotic bacterial community was associated with iNOA and complete germ cell aplasia. Novel findings on testicular BM could support future translational therapies of male-factor infertility. This work was supported by URI-Urological Research Institute free funds. Authors declared no conflict of interest. N/A.

J Indian Prosthodont Soc, Official publication of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Does the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in semen impact seminal parameters and sperm DNA quality in white European men seeking medical help for primary couple's infertility? HPV seminal infections involving high-risk (HR) genotypes are associated with impaired sperm progressive motility and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) values. HPV is commonly present in semen samples. However, whether the presence of HPV in semen is actually associated with impaired sperm parameters and SDF values have yet to be elucidated. In this cross-sectional study, complete demographic, clinical and laboratory data from 729 infertile men were analysed. Health-significant comorbidities were scored with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Serum hormones and SDF index (measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay [SCSA]) were measured in every patient (SDF ≥30% was defined as pathological). Semen analysis was based on 2010 World Health Organisation reference criteria. Amplification by nested PCR was used to detect HPV-DNA sequences in semen samples. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to test the association between the presence of HPV and clinical and seminal characteristics in the whole cohort. The overall rate of HPV positivity was 15.5% (113/729). Overall, 78/729 (10.7%) and 35/729 (4.8%) patients had HR HPV+ and low-risk HPV+, respectively. HPV16 was the most prevalent type (22.1%), followed by HPV43 (10.6%), HPV56 and HPV42 (both 8.8%). No differences were found in terms of clinical and hormonal characteristics between patients with or without seminal HPV. Sperm progressive motility was significantly lower (P = 0.01) while SDF values were higher (P = 0.005) in HPV+ men compared to those with no HPV. In particular, HR HPV+ men had lower sperm progressive motility (P = 0.007) and higher SDF values (P = 0.003) than those with a negative HPV test. Univariable analysis showed that HR HPV+ was associated with impaired sperm progressive motility (P = 0.002) and SDF values (P = 0.003). In the multivariable analysis, age, FSH levels and testicular volume were significantly associated with impaired sperm progressive motility (all P ≤ 0.04). Conversely BMI, CCI, smoking habits and HPV status were not. Only age (P = 0.02) and FSH (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with SDF, after accounting for BMI, CCI, testicular volume, smoking habits and HPV status. Main limitations are the cross-sectional design of our study and the relatively small sample size of the subgroups. Additional limitations are the lack of a control group of normal fertile men and the lack of follow-up testing to check the clearance or the persistence of HPV in semen after a 6-12 months. Overall, these observations point out the importance of an accurate investigation of seminal HPV presence in everyday clinical practice in the diagnostic work-up of infertile men. No external funding was used. There are no competing interests.