To determine the role of perinatally acquired Candida colonization to invasive Candida infection (candidemia) and to assess risk factors associated with Candida colonization and candidemia in neonatal intensive care unit patients. Retrospective case-control study. Neonatal intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. A total of 39 of 3219 (1.2%) who were positive for Candida colonization at birth were compared with 117 noncolonized controls. Routine surveillance cultures for Candida of skin and meconium were performed at admission. All neonates with Candida colonization at birth during a 10-yr period were identified. Each case was matched to place of birth and date of admission with three noncolonized controls. Perinatal and neonatal variables were collected. Blood or skin culture was obtained when signs of sepsis or dermatitis were present. Patients with Candida colonization were compared with their noncolonized controls, whereas in this cohort, patients with candidemia were compared with those without by multivariate analysis. Vaginal candidiasis (odds ratio [OR] 15.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.63, 94.77), birth weight below 1000 g (OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.22, 52.26), and vaginal delivery (OR 7.08, 95% CI 1.17, 42.70) were associated with Candida colonization. An increased risk for nosocomial candidemia was independently associated with the number of sites of Candida colonization (OR 24.02, 95% CI 1.89, 304), early neonatal neutropenia (OR 7.15, 95% CI 0.98, 80.95) and illness severity (clinical risk index for babies [CRIB]) score at day 1 (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.065, 1.811). Maternal vaginal candidiasis and vaginal birth are risk factors for neonatal colonization. When controlling for illness severity, the number of sites colonized with Candida at birth contributes to neonatal nosocomial candidemia. Early neutropenia increases the risk further. These findings offer opportunities for prevention of Candida infection in neonatal intensive care unit patients.
Objective: Diagnosis of neonatal catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is currently based on isolation of identical bacterial species from bloodstream and catheter tip cultures. This requires removal of the catheter followed by the insertion of a new catheter. The objective of this study was to investigate whether differential time to positivity (DTP) of blood cultures drawn from paired peripheral vein and central vascular catheter is useful for diagnosing neonatal CRBSI, avoiding removal of the catheter. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit, University Hospital of Antwerp, Belgium. Patients: Neonates with probable and definite nosocomial bloodstream infection. Interventions: All episodes of nosocomial bloodstream infection (NBSI) in an approximately 7.5-yr period were identified retrospectively. Definite NBSI episodes in which paired blood cultures were obtained were retained to calculate DTP, to determine the optimal DTP cutoff for the diagnosis of CRBSI, and to assess the validity of DTP for the diagnosis of CRBSI. Measurements and Main Results: Of 32 NBSI episodes included in the study, 16 were CRBSI, seven were non-CRBSI, and nine were classified as “diagnosis uncertain.” In CRBSI, blood cultures drawn from a central vascular catheter were positive earlier than those drawn from a peripheral vein (median 9.67 hrs vs. 21.58 hrs, p < .01). Median DTP was 10.42 hrs in CRBSI and −0.33 hrs in non-CRBSI (p = .01). The optimal DTP cutoff for the diagnosis of CRBSI was ≥1 hr (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.84 ± 0.11), with a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 71%, a positive predictive value of 88%, and a negative predictive value of 83%. Conclusions: Differential time to positivity of paired blood cultures may have some potential in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections in neonatal intensive care unit patients and should be subjected to a prospective study.