Ana Isabel avila bernabeu

Dr. Ana Isabel avila bernabeu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2021 in Frontiers in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAna Isabel avila bernabeu
Ana Isabel avila bernabeu
EGEva Gavela
Eva Gavela
ASAsunción Sancho
Asunción Sancho
Thrombotic microangiopathy is a rare but serious complication that affects kidney transplant recipients. It appears in 0.8–14% of transplanted patients and negatively affects graft and patient survival. It can appear in a systemic form, with hemolytic microangiopathic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal failure, or in a localized form, with progressive renal failure, proteinuria, or arterial hypertension. Post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy is classified as recurrent atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome orde novothrombotic microangiopathy.De novothrombotic microangiopathy accounts for the majority of cases. Distinguishing between the 2 conditions can be difficult, given there is an overlap between them. Complement overactivation is the cornerstone of all post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathies, and has been demonstrated in the context of organ procurement, ischemia-reperfusion phenomena, immunosuppressive drugs, antibody-mediated rejection, viral infections, and post-transplant relapse of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Although treatment of the causative agents is usually the first line of treatment, this approach might not be sufficient. Plasma exchange typically resolves hematologic abnormalities but does not improve renal function. Complement blockade with eculizumab has been shown to be an effective therapy in post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy, but it is necessary to define which patients can benefit from this therapy and when and how eculizumab should be used.

1 December 2023 in Frontiers in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAna Isabel avila bernabeu
Ana Isabel avila bernabeu
MCMercedes Cao
Mercedes Cao
MEMario Espinosa
Mario Espinosa
JMJoaquín Manrique
Joaquín Manrique
EMEnrique Morales
Enrique Morales
Background: Despite significant advances in therapeutic management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), guidelines are not timely updated and achieving a consensus on management recommendations remains a topic of ongoing discussion.Methods: A Scientific Committee with five experts was set up. A literature review was conducted and publications addressing the classification of aHUS, patient profiles and therapeutic approach were selected. Recommendations were proposed at an initial meeting, evaluated through an online questionnaire and validated during a second meeting.Results: Patients with confirmed or clear suspicion of aHUS should be treated with C5 inhibitors within 24 h of the diagnosis or suspicion of aHUS. Treatment monitoring and the decision to interrupt treatment should be individualised according to the risk of relapse and each patient’s evolution. aHUS with a genetic variant or associated with pregnancy should be treated for at least 6–12 months; de novo aHUS associated with kidney transplant until renal function is recovered and genetic variants are ruled out; aHUS associated with malignant hypertension until genetic variants are ruled out; aHUS associated with non-kidney transplant, autoimmune diseases, infection-or drug-induced until the thrombotic microangiopathy is resolved. Patients with a high risk of relapse should be treated for longer than 6–12 months.Conclusion: These recommendations provides physicians who are not familiar with the disease with recommendations for the management of aHUS in adults. The experts who participated advocate early treatment, maintenance for at least 6–12 months and treatment interruption guided by genetic background, trigger factors, risk of relapse and evolution.

31 August 2023 in Rheumatology International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEmma Calatayud
Emma Calatayud
MMMarco Montomoli
Marco Montomoli
ABAna Isabel avila bernabeu
Ana Isabel avila bernabeu
ACAsunción Sancho Calabuig
Asunción Sancho Calabuig
JSJuan José Alegre Sancho
Juan José Alegre Sancho
Lupus nephritis is a major cause of morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Responsiveness to treatment is crucial to avoid chronic kidney disease. New molecules have been developed in recent years to improve renal survival rates. Biological therapies as coadjutant to conventional induction treatment have been tested in randomized clinical trials with heterogeneous results. Like many others biologic therapies, Abatacept has not shown a clear benefit in the context of clinical trials. We present two cases of lupus nephritis patients in whom addition of abatacept resulted in complete remission of the renal disease. The first case described a 49-year-old male with class IV lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria and high immunological activity refractory to conventional treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids and multitarget therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Several biological therapies (rituximab, belimumab and tocilizumab) were unsuccessfully tried, so that abatacept was added to his background multitarget therapy showing complete clinical response. The second case described a 52-year-old female with class IV lupus nephritis treated initially with conventional treatment with partial response. In successive renal flares with nephrotic proteinuria, she showed intolerance to rituximab and refractoriness to voclosporin. Finally, abatacept was added to her background therapy with MMF and PDN showing complete and maintained remission of the disease. In no case the use of abatacept was associated with serious adverse events. Based on our experience, abatacept should be considered as a safe rescue therapy in patients with refractory lupus nephritis and proteinuria with nephrotic range. In addition to this case, we reviewed the use of abatacept in lupus nephritis in the literature.

22 January 2015 in Clinical Kidney Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAna Isabel avila bernabeu
Ana Isabel avila bernabeu
BVBelén Vizcaíno
Belén Vizcaíno
PMPablo Molina
Pablo Molina
EGEva Gavela
Eva Gavela
MPMaria Perez-Ebri
Maria Perez-Ebri
LPLuís Pallardó
Luís Pallardó
Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disease characterized by haemolytic microangiopathic anaemia, thrombocytopaenia and acute onset of renal failure, in the absence of Escherichia coli infection. Renal damage usually progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), sometimes being accompanied by signs of extrarenal thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). We report a case of full neurological and haematological recovery after eculizumab treatment in a patient with ESRD secondary to chronic aHUS refractory to plasmatherapy while she was under dialysis. It highlights the use of eculizumab for controlling extrarenal manifestations of aHUS in this population.

1 May 2018 in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pablo MolinaPablo Molina
Pablo Molina
BVBelén Vizcaíno
Belén Vizcaíno
MMMariola Molina
Mariola Molina
SBSandra Beltrán
Sandra Beltrán
MGMercedes González-Moya
Mercedes González-Moya
JCJuan Carrero
Juan Carrero
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Compared to conventional hemodialysis (HD), on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) achieves a more efficient removal of uremic toxins and reduces inflammation, which could favourably affect nutritional status. We evaluated the effect of OL-HDF on body composition and nutritional status in prevalent high-flux HD (HF-HD) patients.