Bullying is a social phenomenon that impacts a large number of children and young people, worldwide. This study aimed to longitudinally examine the development of bullying and victimization in Chinese students in grades 4, 5, and 6. We used latent class analysis to empirically identify groups of youth with different bullying and victimization patterns, and then used latent transition analysis to explore the movement of children between these latent classes over time. Results showed that: (1) across the three time points, students could be classified into four classes: bullies, victims, bully-victims, and non-involved children; and (2) students in the non-involved class tended to remain in that class when moving to higher grades, students in the bully and victims classes tended to transition to the non-involved class, while students in the bully-victims class tended to transition to the bullies class. Thus, future intervention should be implemented to prevent bully-victims from bullying behaviors.

The validity of inferences based on test scores will be threatened when examinees' test-taking non-effort is ignored. A possible solution is to add test-taking effort indicators in the measurement model after the non-effortful responses are flagged. As a new application of the multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model for non-ignorable missing responses, this article proposed a MIRT method to account for non-effortful responses. Two simulation studies were conducted to examine the impact of non-effortful responses on item and latent ability parameter estimates, and to evaluate the performance of the MIRT method, comparing to the three-parameter logistic (3PL) model as well as the effort-moderated model. Results showed that: (a) as the percentage of non-effortful responses increased, the unidimensional 3PL model yielded poorer parameter estimates; (b) the MIRT model could obtain as accurate item parameter estimates as the effort-moderated model; (c) the MIRT model provided the most accurate ability parameter estimates when the correlation between test-taking effort and ability was high. A real data analysis was also conducted for illustration. The limitation and future research were discussed further.