Coagulant aids are useful chemicals that enhance the efficiency of coagulation sedimentation treatment. For this purpose, it is necessary to choose safe chemicals to avoid various risks to the health of those who use the treated water. The use of chitosan, an abundant natural polysaccharide, as a coagulant aid is significant not only for safe water treatment but also for the effective utilization of unused natural water resources, which are mostly wasted. We experimentally determined the optimal treatment conditions for using chitosan as a coagulant aid in water treatment. The most efficient use was identified as adding chitosan at the stage of rapid stirring after the addition of coagulant accelerated initial dispersion. When used with the main coagulant polyaluminum chloride (PACl), the optimal concentration of chitosan was 0.8 mg L⁻¹, as estimated using the ζ potential showing isoelectricity at the optimal chitosan concentration. Determining the chitosan concentration using the minimum ζ potential was also valid for estimating the optimum concentration of chitosan, which is an extension of the method used at much higher turbidity, as seen in wastewater. Thus, the ζ potential-based prediction of the optimum chitosan concentration was effective even when the effect of sweep coagulation, which is normally induced at higher turbidity, was negligible. The superiority of using the coagulant PACl in combination with chitosan as the coagulant aid was demonstrated by comparing the in situ-observed coagulation process to cases with other coagulants and coagulant aids using direct time-series observation of the coagulation process. The use of chitosan with PACl was found to make the flocs easier to remove because it resulted in the largest mass fraction of the resultant floc sedimentation on the bottom of the vessel. In this study, using the PACl coagulant in combination with chitosan as the coagulant aid was found to be as viable as using the current popular combination of aluminum sulfate and polyacrylamide. Replacing polyacrylamide with chitosan contributed to reducing the potential risk to the health of those to use the treated water.

This study was intended to exploit the possibility of using the quick gelation of alcogel that is induced by adding catalytic imidazole into a silicate-oligomer-based solution. For this purpose, the experimental viability of the direct observation of the gelation behavior was actually examined. The silicate oligomer, derived from tetraethyl orthosilicate hydrolyzed under an acidic condition (pH ~ 5), was used as the quickly gelling mother solution. The capability of the oligomer solution to form a non-flowable matter in only a few seconds when triggered by the addition of the catalytic solution of imidazole is promising, for example, for stabilizing a sandy ground surface, due to its simplicity. From the practical viewpoint, how long the gelation could take (=gel time) is a crucial parameter when the choice of an appropriate gelling chemical species needs to be made. Thus, this study focused its interest on as simple an experimental method as possible for evaluating the gel time of the gelling systems that actually underwent instantaneous gelation. The silicate oligomer solution was an appropriate material both in its quick gelling behavior and environmental friendliness. For such quick gelation, rheological approaches are not applicable for detecting the boundary in the mechanical properties that delineate the regime of “gel”. In this study, instead, direct observation was employed to capture the short interval during which the gelation was completed. The silicate-oligomer-based gelling solution was observed to lose its flowability within only 0.2 s, as it was seen to come off the bottom of the shaken cylinder at 5 Hz. For a more quantitative estimation, the same gelling solution was observed by high-speed motion picture. The high-speed motion picture could clearly capture the instantaneous gelation as a sudden arrest of the flow. The sub-millisecond direct observation of the gelation behavior revealed that the timescale of the instantaneous termination of the flow was as quick as 1 ms in order of magnitude. Such instantaneous gelation in the sub-millisecond-order timescale could not be forecasted from the observable megascopic gelation, which appeared to last from 10² ms to 10³ ms in our naked-eye observation. The noteworthy gap between the timescale of the naked-eye-observed gelation and that of the true gel time at a localized spot determined by the high-speed motion picture should be noted to avoid excess agitation, which can result in total collapse into gel fragments of the just solidifying or already solidified gel under strong deformational influence by mechanical agitation, for example.