I.  Quintus Molenaar

Prof. Dr. I. Quintus Molenaar

Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2018 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FGfor the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
TRThijs de Rooij
Thijs de Rooij
JHJony van Hilst
Jony van Hilst
KBKoop Bosscha
Koop Bosscha
MDMarcel G. Dijkgraaf
Marcel G. Dijkgraaf
MBMarc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink
Data from observational studies suggest that minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) is superior to open pancreatoduodenectomy regarding intraoperative blood loss, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay, without increasing total costs. However, several case-matched studies failed to demonstrate superiority of MIPD, and large registry studies from the USA even suggested increased mortality for MIPDs performed in low-volume (<10 MIPDs annually) centers. Randomized controlled multicenter trials are lacking but clearly required. We hypothesize that time to functional recovery is shorter after MIPD compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy, even in an enhanced recovery setting. LEOPARD-2 is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, patient-blinded, multicenter, phase 2/3, superiority trial in centers that completed the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group LAELAPS-2 training program for laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy or LAELAPS-3 training program for robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and have performed ≥ 20 MIPDs. A total of 136 patients with symptomatic benign, premalignant, or malignant disease will be randomly assigned to undergo minimally invasive or open pancreatoduodenectomy in an enhanced recovery setting. After the first 40 patients (phase 2), the data safety monitoring board will assess safety outcomes (not blinded for treatment allocation) and decide on continuation to phase 3. Patients from phase 2 will then be included in phase 3. The primary outcome measure is time (days) to functional recovery. All patients will be blinded for the surgical approach, at least until postoperative day 5, but preferably until functional recovery has been attained. Secondary outcome measures are operative and postoperative outcomes, including clinically relevant complications, mortality, quality of life, and costs. The LEOPARD-2 trial is designed to assess whether MIPD reduces time to functional recovery, as compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy in an enhanced recovery setting. Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5689 . Registered on 2 March 2016.

27 January 2015 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SRS J E Rombouts
S J E Rombouts
JVJ A Vogel
J A Vogel
HSH. C. van Santvoort
H. C. van Santvoort
KLK. P. van Lienden
K. P. van Lienden
RHR. van Hillegersberg
R. van Hillegersberg
IMI. Quintus Molenaar
I. Quintus Molenaar

9 March 2016 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
F(for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG)
for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG)
EVEva Versteijne
Eva Versteijne
Casper Van EijckCasper Van Eijck
Casper Van Eijck
CPCornelis J. A. Punt
Cornelis J. A. Punt
MSMustafa Suker
Mustafa Suker
GTGeertjan van Tienhoven
Geertjan van Tienhoven
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth largest cause of cancer death in the United States and Europe with over 100,000 deaths per year in Europe alone. The overall 5-year survival ranges from 2–7 % and has hardly improved over the last two decades. Approximately 15 % of all patients have resectable disease at diagnosis, and of those, only a subgroup has a resectable tumour at surgical exploration. Data from cohort studies have suggested that outcome can be improved by preoperative radiochemotherapy, but data from well-designed randomized studies are lacking. Our PREOPANC phase III trial aims to test the hypothesis that median overall survival of patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer can be improved with preoperative radiochemotherapy. The PREOPANC trial is a randomized, controlled, multicentric superiority trial, initiated by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer are randomized to A: direct explorative laparotomy or B: after negative diagnostic laparoscopy, preoperative radiochemotherapy, followed by explorative laparotomy. A hypofractionated radiation scheme of 15 fractions of 2.4 gray (Gy) is combined with a course of gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m2/dose on days 1, 8 and 15, preceded and followed by a modified course of gemcitabine. The target volumes of radiation are delineated on a 4D CT scan, where at least 95 % of the prescribed dose of 36 Gy in 15 fractions should cover 98 % of the planning target volume. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy is administered in both treatment arms after resection (six cycles in arm A and four in arm B). In total, 244 patients will be randomized in 17 hospitals in the Netherlands. The primary endpoint is overall survival by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints are (R0) resection rate, disease-free survival, time to locoregional recurrence or distant metastases and perioperative complications. Secondary endpoints for the experimental arm are toxicity and radiologic and pathologic response. The PREOPANC trial is designed to investigate whether preoperative radiochemotherapy improves overall survival by means of increased (R0) resection rates in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Trial open for accrual: 3 April 2013 The Netherlands National Trial Register – NTR3709 (8 November 2012) EU Clinical Trials Register – 2012-003181-40 (11 December 2012)

1 June 2017 in JAMA Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSF. Jasmijn Smits
F. Jasmijn Smits
HSHjalmar C. van Santvoort
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
MBMarc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink
MBMarilot C. T. Batenburg
Marilot C. T. Batenburg
RSRobbert A. E. Slooff
Robbert A. E. Slooff
FGfor the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a common and dreaded complication after pancreatoduodenectomy.1-3 This complication, as defined by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF), can be divided into 2 major groups: biochemical, clinically irrelevant fistula (ie, grade A) and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula requiring a change in postoperative management (ie, grades B and C).4 In a recent systematic review of 40 studies reporting ISGPF-defined pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in 12% of patients after pancreatoduodenectomy and was associated with a mortality up to 39%.5 Major causes for mortality in these patients are multiple-organ failure and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage as a direct result of the pancreatic fistula.6

1 August 2019 in HPB
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOA. Floortje van Oosten
A. Floortje van Oosten
FSF. Jasmijn Smits
F. Jasmijn Smits
DHDaniël A.F. van Den Heuvel
Daniël A.F. van Den Heuvel
HSHjalmar C. van Santvoort
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
IMI. Quintus Molenaar
I. Quintus Molenaar

1 February 2017 in HPB
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VGVincent P. Groot
Vincent P. Groot
HSHjalmar C. van Santvoort
Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
SRSteffi J.E. Rombouts
Steffi J.E. Rombouts
JHJeroen Hagendoorn
Jeroen Hagendoorn
IRInne H.M. Borel Rinkes
Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes
IMI. Quintus Molenaar
I. Quintus Molenaar