LncACTdb 3.0 is a comprehensive database of experimentally supported interactions among competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) and the corresponding personalized networks contributing to precision medicine. LncACTdb 3.0 is freely available at http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/LncACTdb or http://www.bio-bigdata.net/LncACTdb. We have updated the LncACTdb 3.0 database with several new features, including (i) 5669 experimentally validated ceRNA interactions across 25 species and 537 diseases/phenotypes through manual curation of published literature, (ii) personalized ceRNA interactions and networks for 16 228 patients from 62 datasets in TCGA and GEO, (iii) sub-cellular and extracellular vesicle locations of ceRNA manually curated from literature and data sources, (iv) more than 10 000 experimentally supported long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) biomarkers associated with tumor diagnosis and therapy, and (v) lncRNA/mRNA/miRNA expression profiles with clinical and pathological information of thousands of cancer patients. A panel of improved tools has been developed to explore the effects of ceRNA on individuals with specific pathological backgrounds. For example, a network tool provides a comprehensive view of lncRNA-related, patient-specific, and custom-designed ceRNA networks. LncACTdb 3.0 will provide novel insights for further studies of complex diseases at the individual level and will facilitate the development of precision medicine to treat such diseases.

Intertumoral immune heterogeneity is a critical reason for distinct clinical benefits of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Tumor immunophenotype (immune ‘Hot’ or ‘Cold’) suggests immunological individual differences and potential clinical treatment guidelines. However, employing epigenome signatures to determine tumor immunophenotypes and responsive treatment is not well understood. To delineate the tumor immunophenotype and immune heterogeneity, we first distinguished the immune ‘Hot’ and ‘Cold’ tumors of LUAD based on five immune expression signatures. In terms of clinical presentation, the immune ‘Hot’ tumors usually had higher immunoactivity, lower disease stages and better survival outcomes than ‘Cold’ tumors. At the epigenome levels, we observed that distinct DNA methylation patterns between immunophenotypes were closely associated with LUAD development. Hence, we identified a set of five CpG sites as the immunophenotype-related methylation signature (iPMS) for tumor immunophenotyping and further confirmed its efficiency based on a machine learning framework. Furthermore, we found iPMS and immunophenotype-related immune checkpoints (IPCPs) could contribute to the risk of tumor progression, implying IPCP has the potential to be a novel immunotherapy blockade target. After further parsing of the role of iPMS-predicted immunophenotypes, we found immune ‘Hot’ was a protective factor leading to better survival outcomes when patients received the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. And iPMS was also a well-performed signature (AUC = 0.752) for predicting the durable/nondurable clinical benefits. In summary, our study explored the role of epigenome signature in clinical tumor immunophenotyping. Utilizing iPMS to characterize tumor immunophenotypes will facilitate developing personalized epigenetic anticancer approaches.

We describe LnCeCell 2.0 (http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/LnCeCell), an updated resource for lncRNA-associated competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks and web tools based on single-cell and spatial transcriptomics sequencing (stRNA-seq) data. We have updated the LnCeCell 2.0 database with significantly expanded data and improved features, including (i) 257 single-cell RNA sequencing and stRNA-seq datasets across 86 diseases/phenotypes and 80 human normal tissues, (ii) 836 581 cell-specific and spatial spot-specific ceRNA interactions and functional networks for 1 002 988 cells and 367 971 spatial spots, (iii) 15 489 experimentally supported lncRNA biomarkers related to disease pathology, diagnosis and treatment, (iv) detailed annotation of cell type, cell state, subcellular and extracellular locations of ceRNAs through manual curation and (v) ceRNA expression profiles and follow-up clinical information of 20 326 cancer patients. Further, a panel of 24 flexible tools (including 8 comprehensive and 16 mini-analysis tools) was developed to investigate ceRNA-regulated mechanisms at single-cell/spot resolution. The CeCellTraject tool, for example, illustrates the detailed ceRNA distribution of different cell populations and explores the dynamic change of the ceRNA network along the developmental trajectory. LnCeCell 2.0 will facilitate the study of fine-tuned lncRNA-ceRNA networks with single-cell and spatial spot resolution, helping us to understand the regulatory mechanisms behind complex microbial ecosystems.