Michael Ashcroft

Dr. Michael Ashcroft


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2021 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PFPieter De Frenne
Pieter De Frenne
JLJonathan Lenoir
Jonathan Lenoir
MLMiska Luoto
Miska Luoto
BSBrett R. Scheffers
Brett R. Scheffers
FZFlorian Zellweger
Florian Zellweger
KHKristoffer Hylander
Kristoffer Hylander

15 July 2010 in Journal of Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMichael Ashcroft
Michael Ashcroft

16 July 2014 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDaniel G. Gavin
Daniel G. Gavin
MFMatthew C. Fitzpatrick
Matthew C. Fitzpatrick
PGPaul F. Gugger
Paul F. Gugger
KHKaty D. Heath
Katy D. Heath
FRFrancisco Rodríguez‐Sánchez
Francisco Rodríguez‐Sánchez
JWJohn W. Williams
John W. Williams
Summary: Climate refugia, locations where taxa survive periods of regionally adverse climate, are thought to be critical for maintaining biodiversity through the glacial–interglacial climate changes of the Quaternary. A critical research need is to better integrate and reconcile the three major lines of evidence used to infer the existence of past refugia – fossil records, species distribution models and phylogeographic surveys – in order to characterize the complex spatiotemporal trajectories of species and populations in and out of refugia. Here we review the complementary strengths, limitations and new advances for these three approaches. We provide case studies to illustrate their combined application, and point the way towards new opportunities for synthesizing these disparate lines of evidence. Case studies with European beech, Qinghai spruce and Douglas‐fir illustrate how the combination of these three approaches successfully resolves complex species histories not attainable from any one approach. Promising new statistical techniques can capitalize on the strengths of each method and provide a robust quantitative reconstruction of species history. Studying past refugia can help identify contemporary refugia and clarify their conservation significance, in particular by elucidating the fine‐scale processes and the particular geographic locations that buffer species against rapidly changing climate. Contents Summary 38 I. Climate refugia: biogeographical and conservation significance 38 II. Approaches for reconstructing refugia: strengths, limitations and recent advances 39 III. Climate refugia of the past: three case studies 46 IV. New integrative approaches to reconstructing refugia 47 V. How can historical refugia inform us about future refugia? 48 VI. Concluding thoughts 49 Acknowledgements 49 References 49

20 April 2020 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJonas Lembrechts
Jonas Lembrechts
JAJuha Aalto
Juha Aalto
MAMichael Ashcroft
Michael Ashcroft
PFPieter De Frenne
Pieter De Frenne
MKMartin Kopecký
Martin Kopecký
INIvan Nijs
Ivan Nijs

3 February 2012 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMichael Ashcroft
Michael Ashcroft
JGJohn R. Gollan
John R. Gollan
DWDavid I. Warton
David I. Warton
DRDaniel Ramp
Daniel Ramp

3 October 2021 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHStef Haesen
Stef Haesen
JLJonas Lembrechts
Jonas Lembrechts
PFPieter De Frenne
Pieter De Frenne
JLJonathan Lenoir
Jonathan Lenoir
JAJuha Aalto
Juha Aalto
KMKoenraad Van Meerbeek
Koenraad Van Meerbeek