Background: This study evaluated the incidence, patterns and risk factors for recurrence after hemithyroidectomy in patients with low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and verified the predictive role of the risk staging systems in current use.Methods: The clinicopathological characteristics and risk categories were analysed according to recurrence in patients who underwent hemithyroidectomy for low- and intermediate-risk conventional PTC, and were followed up for at least 24 months. Five risk staging systems were used to stratify risk: the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) system; Age, Metastases, Extent and Size (AMES) system; Metastases, Age, Complete resection, Invasion and Size (MACIS) system; Grade, Age, Metastases, Extent and Size (GAMES) system; and the eighth AJCC system.Results: The study included 561 patients; 93·9 per cent of the study population (527 of 561) had a papillary thyroid microcarcinoma 1 cm or smaller in size. At a mean follow-up of 83 months, 25 patients (4·5 per cent) had recurrence; among these patients, 23 (92%) presented with a remaining thyroid lobe. Multifocality was significantly associated with recurrence in univariable and multivariable analyses (adjusted hazard ratio 3·16, 95 per cent c.i. 1·25 to 7·98; P = 0·015). Disease-free survival (DFS) varied according to multifocality (P = 0·010). The five risk staging systems were not associated with recurrence, and their Harrell's C-index ranged from 0·500 to 0·531. DFS rates did not differ between the risk categories in each system.Conclusion: Although the recurrence rate after hemithyroidectomy in patients with low- and intermediate-risk PTC was low, meticulous follow-up focusing on the remaining thyroid lobe is needed for early detection and timely management of recurrence. The risk scoring systems in current use have no predictive role in these patients.

The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based recommendations for determining the surgical extent in patients with locally invasive differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Locally invasive DTC with gross extrathyroidal extension invading surrounding anatomical structures may lead to several functional deficits and poor oncological outcomes. At present, the optimal extent of surgery in locally invasive DTC remains a matter of debate, and there are no adequate guidelines. On October 8, 2021, four experts searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases; the identified papers were reviewed by 39 experts in thyroid and head and neck surgery. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of evidence, and to develop and report recommendations. The strength of a recommendation reflects the confidence of a guideline panel that the desirable effects of an intervention outweigh any undesirable effects, across all patients for whom the recommendation is applicable. After completing the draft guidelines, Delphi questionnaires were completed by members of the Korean Society of Head and Neck Surgery. Twenty-seven evidence-based recommendations were made for several factors, including the preoperative workup; surgical extent of thyroidectomy; surgery for cancer invading the strap muscles, recurrent laryngeal nerve, laryngeal framework, trachea, or esophagus; and surgery for patients with central and lateral cervical lymph node involvement. Evidence-based guidelines were devised to help clinicians make safer and more efficient clinical decisions for the optimal surgical treatment of patients with locally invasive DTC.