Midhat Farooqi

Dr. Midhat Farooqi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 January 2020 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMichael J. Burke
Michael J. Burke
RKRumen Kostadinov
Rumen Kostadinov
RSRichard Sposto
Richard Sposto
LGLia Gore
Lia Gore
SKShannon M. Kelley
Shannon M. Kelley
PBPatrick A. Brown
Patrick A. Brown
Purpose: Treatment failure from drug resistance is the primary reason for relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Improving outcomes by targeting mechanisms of drug resistance is a potential solution. Patients and Methods: We report results investigating the epigenetic modulators decitabine and vorinostat with vincristine, dexamethasone, mitoxantrone, and PEG-asparaginase for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL (B-ALL). Twenty-three patients, median age 12 years (range, 1–21) were treated in this trial. Results: The most common grade 3–4 toxicities included hypokalemia (65%), anemia (78%), febrile neutropenia (57%), hypophosphatemia (43%), leukopenia (61%), hyperbilirubinemia (39%), thrombocytopenia (87%), neutropenia (91%), and hypocalcemia (39%). Three subjects experienced dose-limiting toxicities, which included cholestasis, steatosis, and hyperbilirubinemia (n = 1); seizure, somnolence, and delirium (n = 1); and pneumonitis, hypoxia, and hyperbilirubinemia (n = 1). Infectious complications were common with 17 of 23 (74%) subjects experiencing grade ≥3 infections including invasive fungal infections in 35% (8/23). Nine subjects (39%) achieved a complete response (CR + CR without platelet recovery + CR without neutrophil recovery) and five had stable disease (22%). Nine (39%) subjects were not evaluable for response, primarily due to treatment-related toxicities. Correlative pharmacodynamics demonstrated potent in vivo modulation of epigenetic marks, and modulation of biologic pathways associated with functional antileukemic effects. Conclusions: Despite encouraging response rates and pharmacodynamics, the combination of decitabine and vorinostat on this intensive chemotherapy backbone was determined not feasible in B-ALL due to the high incidence of significant infectious toxicities. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01483690.

16 October 2025 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJimin Park
Jimin Park
DCDaniel E. Cook
Daniel E. Cook
PCPi-Chuan Chang
Pi-Chuan Chang
AKAlexey Kolesnikov
Alexey Kolesnikov
LBLucas Brambrink
Lucas Brambrink
KSKishwar Shafin
Kishwar Shafin

1 May 2021 in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLisa A. Lansdon
Lisa A. Lansdon
MCMaxime Cadieux-Dion
Maxime Cadieux-Dion
BYByunggil Yoo
Byunggil Yoo
NMNeil Miller
Neil Miller
ACAna S.A. Cohen
Ana S.A. Cohen
MFMidhat Farooqi
Midhat Farooqi

13 December 2018 in BioTech
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Atif AhmedAtif Ahmed
Atif Ahmed
DVDivya S. Vundamati
Divya S. Vundamati
MFMidhat Farooqi
Midhat Farooqi
EGErin Guest
Erin Guest
Precision oncologic medicine is an emerging approach for cancer treatment that has recently taken giant steps in solid clinical practice. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics that can analyze the individual tumor’s variability in genes have provided greater understanding and additional strategies to treat cancers. Although tumors can be tested by several molecular methods, the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has greatly facilitated our understanding of pediatric cancer and identified additional therapeutic opportunities. Pediatric tumors have a different genetic make-up, with a fewer number of actionable targets than adult tumors. Nevertheless, precision oncology in the pediatric population has greatly improved the survival of patients with leukemia and solid tumors. This review discusses the current status of pediatric precision oncology and the different clinical scenarios in which it can be effectively applied.

1 July 2016 in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KDKurtis D. Davies
Kurtis D. Davies
MFMidhat Farooqi
Midhat Farooqi
MGMike Gruidl
Mike Gruidl
CHCharles E. Hill
Charles E. Hill
JWJulie Woolworth-Hirschhorn
Julie Woolworth-Hirschhorn
DADara L. Aisner
Dara L. Aisner

19 August 2024 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JPJimin Park
Jimin Park
DCDaniel E. Cook
Daniel E. Cook
PCPi-Chuan Chang
Pi-Chuan Chang
AKAlexey Kolesnikov
Alexey Kolesnikov
LBLucas Brambrink
Lucas Brambrink
KSKishwar Shafin
Kishwar Shafin
Somatic variant detection is an integral part of cancer genomics analysis. While most methods have focused on short-read sequencing, long-read technologies now offer potential advantages in terms of repeat mapping and variant phasing. We present DeepSomatic, a deep learning method for detecting somatic SNVs and insertions and deletions (indels) from both short-read and long-read data, with modes for whole-genome and exome sequencing, and able to run on tumor-normal, tumor-only, and with FFPE-prepared samples. To help address the dearth of publicly available training and benchmarking data for somatic variant detection, we generated and make openly available a dataset of five matched tumor-normal cell line pairs sequenced with Illumina, PacBio HiFi, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies, along with benchmark variant sets. Across samples and technologies (short-read and long-read), DeepSomatic consistently outperforms existing callers, particularly for indels.