In participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer, the affibody-based tracer Al¹⁸F-NOTA-HER2-BCH enabled detection of more primary lesions and lymph node, bone, and liver metastases than fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose on PET/CT images.

Pyrotinib is currently approved for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in China. Data on the overall survival (OS) and efficacy in patients with brain metastasis (BM) remain scarce. This study evaluated the effectiveness of pyrotinib in a real-world setting, especially in patients with BM. We reviewed patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with pyrotinib-based therapy between June 2018 and June 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS), OS, objective response rate, and safety were analyzed following the administration of pyrotinib. A total of 239 patients were included. The median PFS in patients who received pyrotinib-based therapy as first-line (15/239), second-line (115/239), or third-or-higher-line (109/239) treatment was 14.00, 9.33, and 8.20 months, respectively, and the median OS was not reached, 29.07 and 22.23 months, respectively. The median PFS in patients who pretreated with trastuzumab (214/239), trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (22/239), lapatinib (68/239), or trastuzumab emtansine (14/239) was 9.33, 6.87, 7.20, and 7.20 months, respectively. In 61 patients with BM, the median PFS was 7.50 months, the median central nervous system (CNS)-PFS was 11.17 months, and the median OS was 21.27 months. Furthermore, 19 patients with concomitant brain radiotherapy tended to achieve a longer OS than 42 patients without radiation (34.17 vs. 20.70 months, P = .112). Long-term outcomes of pyrotinib-based therapy are promising for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in real world and in patients with BM, regardless of the treatment lines and prior anti-HER2 therapies.

Background: Fulvestrant 500mg has proved its clinical effectiveness in previous trials as primary or second line treatment of hormone receptor positive, human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2˗) post-menopausal advanced breast cancer. This real-world study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Fulvestrant in HR+/HER2˗ Chinese advanced breast cancer patients.

Background: Patients with breast cancer exhibit heterogeneity in the expression of the human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Clinically, re-biopsying recurrent or metastatic lesions presents substantial challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HER2-targeted PET/CT imaging in identifying HER2 expression in breast cancer lesions and monitoring therapeutic responses. Patients and Methods: This exploratory analysis used data from a prospective study that included adult patients with breast cancer who underwent both Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging at Beijing Cancer Hospital between June 2020 and July 2023 (NCT04547309). Results: Fifty-nine participants, with a median age of 55 years, were analyzed. Lesions imaged with HER2-targeted PET/CT before anti-HER2 therapy exhibited higher SUVmax values than after therapy in HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3 + lesions (19.9, 95% CI: 15.7-25.3 vs 9.8, 95% CI: 5.6-14.7; P = .006). A significant positive correlation was observed between SUVmax on HER2-targeted PET/CT and IHC before therapy (P = .034), with higher SUVmax values noted in lesions with positive HER2 pathology compared to those with negative HER2 status (17.9 ± 13.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.3; P = .007). HER2 expression heterogeneity was confirmed both between primary and metastatic lesions (22.9%) and among different metastatic sites (26.7%) as assessed by HER2-targeted PET/CT. A superior therapeutic response correlated with higher pretreatment SUVmax values. The HER2-targeted PET/CT procedure was well-tolerated by all patients. Conclusion: HER2-targeted PET/CT imaging offers a practical, non-invasive, and quantitative approach for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer patients, facilitating the optimization and personalization of therapeutic strategies by oncologists.

Purpose: This study evaluated the effectiveness of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of various gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) combined with aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancer. Potential risk factors associated with insufficient OFS were analyzed. Patients and methods: Premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients who had received AI with GnRHa were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into different groups according to monthly or trimonthly GnRHa schedules they received, and the effectiveness of OFS was compared between groups. Insufficient OFS was defined as at least one instance of estradiol ≥ 30 pg/ml. Patient data was gathered from medical records for this comparison. Results: Of the 264 patients enrolled in this study, 117 were administered 3.6 mg of goserelin monthly (goserelin 1 M group), 63 received 3.75 mg of leuprorelin monthly (leuprorelin 1 M group) and 84 were given 11.25 mg of leuprorelin every three months (leuprorelin 3 M group). Overall, 7.20% experienced insufficient OFS. The incidence rates in the three GnRHa depot groups were 7.69%, 6.35%, and 7.14%, respectively, without a significant statistical difference (P = 0.900). Notably, younger patients exhibited a higher likelihood of insufficient OFS [OR = 0.900, 95%CI (0.824–0.982), P = 0.018]. Conclusion: Insufficient OFS remains a concern during GnRHa and AI treatment. The effectiveness of the three GnRHa depots commonly used in China seems comparable. Younger patients face a heightened risk of insufficient OFS.