Kathreena M Kurian

Prof. Kathreena M Kurian

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMatthew Clarke
Matthew Clarke
AMAlan Mackay
Alan Mackay
BIBritta Ismer
Britta Ismer
JPJessica Pickles
Jessica Pickles
RTRuth G. Tatevossian
Ruth G. Tatevossian
CJChris Jones
Chris Jones
Infant high-grade gliomas appear clinically distinct from their counterparts in older children, indicating that histopathologic grading may not accurately reflect the biology of these tumors. We have collected 241 cases under 4 years of age, and carried out histologic review, methylation profiling, and custom panel, genome, or exome sequencing. After excluding tumors representing other established entities or subgroups, we identified 130 cases to be part of an “intrinsic” spectrum of disease specific to the infant population. These included those with targetable MAPK alterations, and a large proportion of remaining cases harboring gene fusions targeting ALK (n = 31), NTRK1/2/3 (n = 21), ROS1 (n = 9), and MET (n = 4) as their driving alterations, with evidence of efficacy of targeted agents in the clinic. These data strongly support the concept that infant gliomas require a change in diagnostic practice and management. Significance: Infant high-grade gliomas in the cerebral hemispheres comprise novel subgroups, with a prevalence of ALK, NTRK1/2/3, ROS1, or MET gene fusions. Kinase fusion–positive tumors have better outcome and respond to targeted therapy clinically. Other subgroups have poor outcome, with fusion-negative cases possibly representing an epigenetically driven pluripotent stem cell phenotype. See related video: https://vimeo.com/438254885 See related commentary by Szulzewsky and Cimino, p. 904. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 890

2 June 2023 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFelix Sahm
Felix Sahm
SBSebastian Brandner
Sebastian Brandner
Luca BerteroLuca Bertero
Luca Bertero
DCDavid Capper
David Capper
PFPim French
Pim French
PWPieter Wesseling
Pieter Wesseling
In the 5th edition of the WHO CNS tumor classification (CNS5, 2021), multiple molecular characteristics became essential diagnostic criteria for many additional CNS tumor types. For those tumors, an integrated, “histomolecular” diagnosis is required. A variety of approaches exists for determining the status of the underlying molecular markers. The present guideline focuses on the methods that can be used for assessment of the currently most informative diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers for the diagnosis of gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors. The main characteristics of the molecular methods are systematically discussed, followed by recommendations and information on available evidence levels for diagnostic measures. The recommendations cover DNA and RNA next-generation-sequencing, methylome profiling, and select assays for single/limited target analyses, including immunohistochemistry. Additionally, because of its importance as a predictive marker in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, tools for the analysis of MGMT promoter methylation status are covered. A structured overview of the different assays with their characteristics, especially their advantages and limitations, is provided, and requirements for input material and reporting of results are clarified. General aspects of molecular diagnostic testing regarding clinical relevance, accessibility, cost, implementation, regulatory, and ethical aspects are discussed as well. Finally, we provide an outlook on new developments in the landscape of molecular testing technologies in neuro-oncology.

30 April 2021 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSebastian Brandner
Sebastian Brandner
AMAlexandra McAleenan
Alexandra McAleenan
CKClaire Kelly
Claire Kelly
FSFrancesca Spiga
Francesca Spiga
HCHung-Yuan Cheng
Hung-Yuan Cheng
KKKathreena M Kurian
Kathreena M Kurian
The DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) causes resistance of tumor cells to alkylating agents. It is a predictive biomarker in high-grade gliomas treated with temozolomide, however, there is no consensus on which test method, methylation sites, and cutoff values to use. We performed a Cochrane Review to examine studies using different techniques to measure MGMT and predict survival in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide. Eligible longitudinal studies included (i) adults with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide with or without radiotherapy, or surgery; (ii) where MGMT status was determined in tumor tissue, and assessed by 1 or more technique; and (iii) where overall survival was an outcome parameter, with sufficient information to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Two or more methods were compared in 32 independent cohorts with 3474 patients. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ) techniques were more prognostic than immunohistochemistry for MGMT protein, and PSQ is a slightly better predictor than MSP. We cannot draw strong conclusions about use of frozen tissue vs formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded in MSP and PSQ. Also, our meta-analysis does not provide strong evidence about the best CpG sites or threshold. MSP has been studied mainly for CpG sites 76-80 and 84-87 and PSQ at CpG sites ranging from 72 to 95. A cutoff threshold of 9% for CpG sites 74-78 performed better than higher thresholds of 28% or 29% in 2 of the 3 good-quality studies. About 190 studies were identified presenting HRs from survival analysis in patients in which MGMT methylation was measured by 1 technique only.

28 October 2021 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALily J Andrews
Lily J Andrews
ZTZak A Thornton
Zak A Thornton
SSSaanwalshah S Saincher
Saanwalshah S Saincher
IYIan Y Yao
Ian Y Yao
SDSarah Dawson
Sarah Dawson
KKKathreena M Kurian
Kathreena M Kurian
Detailed prevalence estimates of BRAFV600 mutations and BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) treatment responses in V600-mutant glioma will inform trial development. Our systematic review analyzed overall prevalence of BRAFV600 mutations in glioma and BRAFi treatment response. Based on 13 682 patients in 182 publications, the prevalence of BRAFV600 in epithelioid glioblastoma (eGBM) was 69% [95% CI: 45–89%]; pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA): 56% [48–64%] anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (aPXA): 38% [23–54%], ganglioglioma (GG): 40% [33–46%], and anaplastic ganglioglioma (aGG): 46% [18–76%]. Prevalence in astroblastoma was 24% [8–43%], desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma (DIA): 16% [0–57%], subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA): 8% [0–37%], dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNET): 3% [0–11%], diffuse astrocytoma (DA): 3% [0–9%], and pilocytic astrocytoma (PA): 3% [2–5%]. We reviewed 394 V600-mutant gliomas treated with BRAFi from 130 publications. One hundred and twenty-nine pediatric low-grade gliomas showed 4 (3.1%) complete response (CR); 53 (41.1%) partial response (PR); 64 (49.6%) stable disease (SD) and 8 (6.2%) progressive disease (PD). 25 pediatric high-grade gliomas showed CR; PR; SD; PD in 4 (16.0%); 10 (40.0%), 4 (16.0%); and 7 (28.0%) respectively. Thirty-nine adult low-grade gliomas showed CR; PR; SD; PD of 4 (10.3%); 17 (43.6%); 16 (41.0%) and 2 (5.1%) respectively. Ninety-seven adult high-grade gliomas showed CR; PR; SD; PD of 6 (6.2%); 31 (32.0%); 27 (27.8%); and 33 (34.0%) respectively. BRAFV600 prevalence is highest in eGBM, PXA, aPXA, GG, aGG, and lower in astroblastoma, DIA, SEGA, DNET, DA, and PA. Our data provide the rationale for adjuvant clinical trials of BRAFi in V600-mutant glioma.

28 March 2017 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MWMaria J. Williams
Maria J. Williams
WSWill G. B. Singleton
Will G. B. Singleton
SLStephen P. Lowis
Stephen P. Lowis
KMKarim Malik
Karim Malik
KKKathreena M Kurian
Kathreena M Kurian
Recent exciting work partly through The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), has implicated epigenetic mechanisms including histone modifications in the development of both paediatric and adult high grade glioma. Histone lysine methylation has emerged as an important player in regulating gene expression and chromatin function. Lysine (K) 27 (K27) is a critical residue in all seven histone 3 variants and the subject of post-translational histone modifications, as it can be both methylated and acetylated. In paediatric high grade glioma, two critical single point mutations occur in the H3F3A gene encoding the regulatory histone variant H3.3. These mutations occur at lysine (K) 27 (K27M) and glycine (G) 34 (G34R/V), both of which are involved with key regulatory post-transcriptional modifications. These mutations therefore effect gene expression, cell differentiation and telomere maintenance. In recent years, alterations in histone acetylation have provided novel opportunities to explore new pharmacological targeting, with histone deacetylase (HDAC) overexpression reported in high-grade, late-stage proliferative tumours. HDAC inhibitors have shown promising therapeutic potential in many malignancies. This review focuses on the mechanisms propagating paediatric and adult high grade gliomas, as well as summarising the current advances in clinical trials using HDAC inhibitors to combat an aggressive brain tumour.

3 March 2022 in Nanoscale Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMattia Ghirardello
Mattia Ghirardello
RSRadhe Shyam
Radhe Shyam
XLXia Liu
Xia Liu
TGTeodoro Garcia-Millan
Teodoro Garcia-Millan
ISImke Sittel
Imke Sittel
Carmen Galan-MarinCarmen Galan-Marin
Carmen Galan-Marin
Carbon dot-labelled antibody for human brain tissue immunofluorescent staining.