The importance of studying the relationships between colleges, businesses, and governments has grown as a result of the recent explosion of technical advancements. The potential for national economic growth is enhanced by the dissemination of new information discovered via research. When it comes to the generation of new information that can be used by established economies, universities play a crucial role. So, in this study we proposed a framework for select best strategy in higher education. This process contains many conflicting criteria, so the concept of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is used. The MCDM is integrated with the triangular neutrosophic sets to overcome the vague information. The COCOSO technique is proposed to rank the alternatives. Higher education officials, including government bureaucrats and academic administrators, may put the recommended approach to use.

American scientific publishing group

Corporate enterprises around the world are facing increasing pressure to operate sustainably due to rising environmental concerns such as climate change, resource scarcity, and ecological degradation. In response, circular supply chain (CSC) practices have emerged as a promising solution, especially within the manufacturing and beverage sectors. CSC focuses on reusing materials, minimizing waste, and creating value from products that have reached the end of their lifecycle. This study investigates the challenges and opportunities of applying circular supply chain management (CSCM) in the beverage industry, which is known for generating significant waste due to high production volumes. The research identifies key factors influencing waste management and proposes five sustainable strategies designed to improve CSCM performance. These strategies are evaluated based on several criteria, including resource efficiency, packaging sustainability, circularity, social responsibility, risk management, innovation and technology, and economic feasibility. A total of 23 related attributes were assessed to provide a detailed understanding of each strategy's effectiveness. To further support decision-making, a managerial sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the impact of different criteria on each strategy. Outcomes indicate that one strategy, referred to as EVLA3, stands out as the most effective according to experts and decision-makers. The study provides practical insights for companies seeking to enhance sustainability in their supply chains and reduce their environmental footprint.

The purpose of this study is to strength information of sustainability Reports (SusRs) toward achieving sustainable development (SusD) according to SustainableDevelopment Goals (UN_SDGs). So, we proposed a robust framework for enhancing and appraising corporate sustainability performance by integrating BI in SusRs to provides a structured approach for nterprises.Due to ability of BI to facilitate collect, analyze, and report processes on sustainability data. Additionality it leads to informed decision-making and improved sustainability outcomes. Our framework highlights the importance of SusR and its impact on stakeholder engagement and transparency. Moreover, it emphasized the potential of BI in enhancing the accuracy, reliability, and completeness of sustainability reporting. The framework's practical application is demonstrated through a case study, which showcases how it can be used to identify sustainability risks and opportunities and develop effective sustainability strategies. Generally, our work contributes to the growing body of research on corporate sustainability by providing a comprehensive framework that can help companies to achieve their sustainability goals while driving business performance.

While it is still in its infancy in comparison to other forms of renewable technology, there is a growing amount of interest and backing for wave energy as a potentially useful renewable resource that could replace a portion of the existing energy supply. In the context of sustainable development, the choice of technology represents a multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) challenge that may affect the competitive advantages enjoyed by an organization or a nation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the many wave energy technologies that are now in use as possible choices for green and sustainable technologies that may be used in the seas and oceans. However, requirements like ecological, financial, and technological factors that are based on the fundamental idea of sustainability calls for unclear or unreliable expert assessments that can be solved using single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs). Because of this, the selection of sustainable wave energy technology requires the creation of a one-of-a-kind framework that can analyze both clear and ambiguous data simultaneously without sacrificing any of the information in either category. This study developed a framework that uses measurement alternatives and ranking based on compromise solution (MARCOS) within the context of SVNSs to assist decision-makers in the process of resolving real-time energy problems. An application of the process of selecting the wave energy technology is taken into consideration here as a means of illustrating how applicable the suggested framework is.