Introduction: Cuproptosis and ferroptosis are the two newly defined metal-related regulated cell death. However, the crosstalk between cuproptosis and ferroptosis is obscure. Materials and methods: We analyzed the effect of ferroptosis inducers on copper ionophores-induced cell death through CCK-8 assay. Cuproptosis was studied using immunofluorescence and protein soluble-insoluble fraction isolation. GSH assay, qRT-PCR and western blot were adopted to explore the machinery of ferroptosis inducers enhanced cuproptosis. And mouse xenograft model was built to detect the synergy effect of elesclomol-Cu and sorafenib in vivo. Results: Herein we found that ferroptosis inducers sorafenib and erastin could enhance cuproptosis in primary liver cancer cells by increasing copper dependent lipoylated protein aggregation. Mechanically, sorafenib and erastin upregulated protein lipoylation via suppressing mitochondrial matrix-related proteases mediated ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) protein degradation, and reduced intracellular copper chelator glutathione (GSH) synthesis through inhibiting cystine importing. Discussion/Conclusion: Our findings proposed that combination of ferroptosis inducers and copper ionophores to co-targeting ferroptosis and cuproptosis could be a novel therapeutic strategy for primary liver cancer.

Chemoresistance remains the uppermost disincentive for cancer treatment on account of many genetic and epigenetic alterations. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging players in promoting cancer initiation and progression. However, the regulation and function in chemoresistance are largely unknown. Herein, we identified ARHGAP5-AS1 as a lncRNA upregulated in chemoresistant gastric cancer cells and its knockdown reversed chemoresistance. Meanwhile, high ARHGAP5-AS1 expression was associated with poor prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Intriguingly, its abundance is affected by autophagy and SQSTM1 is responsible for transporting ARHGAP5-AS1 to autophagosomes. Inhibition of autophagy in chemoresistant cells, thus, resulted in the upregulation of ARHGAP5-AS1. In turn, it activated the transcription of ARHGAP5 in the nucleus by directly interacting with ARHGAP5 promoter. Interestingly, ARHGAP5-AS1 also stabilized ARHGAP5 mRNA in the cytoplasm by recruiting METTL3 to stimulate m⁶A modification of ARHGAP5 mRNA. As a result, ARHGAP5 was upregulated to promote chemoresistance and its upregulation was also associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer. In summary, impaired autophagic degradation of lncRNA ARHGAP5-AS1 in chemoresistant cancer cells promoted chemoresistance. It can activate the transcription of ARHGAP5 in the nucleus and stimulate m⁶A modification of ARHGAP5 mRNA to stabilize ARHGAP5 mRNA in the cytoplasm by recruiting METTL3. Therefore, targeting ARHGAP5-AS1/ARHGAP5 axis might be a promising strategy to overcome chemoresistance in gastric cancer.

Autophagy degrades non-functioning or damaged proteins and organelles to maintain cellular homeostasis in a physiological or pathological context. Autophagy can be protective or detrimental, depending on its activation status and other conditions. Therefore, autophagy has a crucial role in a myriad of pathophysiological processes. From the perspective of autophagy-related (ATG) genes, the molecular dissection of autophagy process and the regulation of its level have been largely unraveled. However, the discovery of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) provides a new paradigm of gene regulation in almost all important biological processes, including autophagy. In this review, we highlight recent advances in autophagy-associated lncRNAs and their specific autophagic targets, as well as their relevance to human diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cerebral ischemic stroke.

Background: Chemoresistance to cisplatin (DDP) remains a major challenge in advanced gastric cancer (GC) treatment. Although accumulating evidence suggests an association between dysregulation of long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and chemoresistance, the regulatory functions and complexities of lncRNAs in modulating DDP‐based chemotherapy in GC remain under‐investigated. This study was designed to explore the critical chemoresistance‐related lncRNAs in GC and identify novel therapeutic targets for patients with chemoresistant GC.Methods: Chemoresistance‐related lncRNAs were identified through microarray and verified through a quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). Proteins bound by lncRNAs were identified through a human proteome array and validated through RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and RNA pull‐down assays. Co‐immunoprecipitation and ubiquitination assays were performed to explore the molecular mechanisms of the Musashi2 (MSI2) post‐modification. The effects of LINC00942 (LNC942) and MSI2 on DDP‐based chemotherapy were investigated through MTS, apoptosis assays and xenograft tumour formation in vivo.Results: LNC942 was found to be up‐regulated in chemoresistant GC cells, and its high expression was positively correlated with the poor prognosis of patients with GC. Functional studies indicated that LNC942 confers chemoresistance to GC cells by impairing apoptosis and inducing stemness. Mechanically, LNC942 up‐regulated the MSI2 expression by preventing its interaction with SCF^β‐TRCP E3 ubiquitin ligase, eventually inhibiting ubiquitination. Then, LNC942 stabilized c‐Myc mRNA in an N6‐methyladenosine (m⁶A)‐dependent manner. As a potential m⁶A recognition protein, MSI2 stabilized c‐Myc mRNA with m⁶A modifications. Moreover, inhibition of the LNC942‐MSI2‐c‐Myc axis was found to restore chemosensitivity both in vitro and in vivo.Conclusions: These results uncover a chemoresistant accelerating function of LNC942 in GC, and disrupting the LNC942‐MSI2‐c‐Myc axis could be a novel therapeutic strategy for GC patients undergoing chemoresistance.

Copper is an essential micronutrient in the human body, mainly acting as a crucial cofactor required for a wide range of physiological processes across nearly all cell types. Recent advances revealed that tumor cells seize copper to fulfill their rapid proliferation, metastasis, immune evasion, and so on by reprogramming the copper regulatory network, defined as cuproplasia. Thus, targeting copper chelation to reduce copper levels has been considered a rational tumor therapy strategy. However, overloaded copper ions could be toxic, which leads to the aggregation of lipoylated mitochondrial proteins and the depletion of iron‐sulfur clusters, ultimately resulting in cell death, termed cuproptosis. Upon its discovery, cuproptosis has attracted great interest from oncologists, and targeting cuproptosis by copper ionophores exhibits as a potential anti‐tumor therapy. In this review, we present the underlying mechanisms involved in cuproplasia and cuproptosis. Additionally, we sum up the chemicals targeting either cuproplasia or cuproptosis for cancer therapy. Further attention should be paid to distinguishing cancer patients who are suitable for targeting cuproplasia or cuproptosis.