Estimating clumping indices is important for determining the leaf area index (LAI) of forest canopies. The spatial distribution of the clumping index is vital for LAI estimation. However, the neglect of woody tissue can result in biased clumping index estimates when indirectly deriving them from the gap probability and LAI observations. It is difficult to effectively and automatically extract woody tissue from digital hemispherical photos. In this study, a method for the automatic detection of trunks from Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) data was used. Between-crown and within-crown gaps from TLS data were separated to calculate the clumping index. Subsequently, we analyzed the gap probability, clumping index, and LAI estimates based on TLS and HemiView data in consideration of woody tissue (trunks). Although the clumping index estimated from TLS had better agreement (R² = 0.761) than that from HemiView, the change of angular distribution of the clumping index affected by the trunks from TLS data was more obvious than with the HemiView data. Finally, the exclusion of the trunks led to a reduction in the average LAI by ~19.6% and 8.9%, respectively, for the two methods. These results also showed that the detection of woody tissue was more helpful for the estimation of clumping index distribution. Moreover, the angular distribution of the clumping index is more important for the LAI estimate than the average clumping index value. We concluded that woody tissue should be detected for the clumping index estimate from TLS data, and 3D information could be used for estimating the angular distribution of the clumping index, which is essential for highly accurate LAI field measurements.

A comprehensive assessment of satellite-derived albedo products is undeniably essential for better use consideration and the further refinement of the retrieval algorithm. Although satellite albedo products have been extensively validated over spatially homogeneous areas, it remains a challenge to validate them over rugged terrain. Consequently, the accuracy of satellite albedo products over rugged terrain is still unknown. This study for the first time systematically evaluated two widely used satellite albedo products (i.e., MCD43A3 V006 and GLASS V04 albedo) over mountainous areas with a Mountain Radiation Transfer (MRT) coupled multi-scale validation strategy. Fine-scale albedo was first generated with a root mean square error (RMSE) smaller than 0.0317. Then they were upscaled to the coarse pixel and as the reference data for validation. The validation results indicated that the accuracy of the two products tends to decrease with the increase of means slopes. The RMSE and relative RMSE (RMSE _R ) of full retrieval MCD43A3 C6 black-sky albedo (BSA) and white-sky albedo (WSA) over abrupt slopes (mean slope >10°) increase to 0.0432 and 31.87% and to 0.0436 and 32.21%, respectively. The RMSE and RMSE _R of high quality GLASS V04 were 0.0452 and 33.71% of BSA and 0.0458 and 33.92 % of WSA respectively over abrupt slopes. Particularly, if the backup retrievals were included over the abrupt slopes, the RMSE and RMSER of MCD43A3 C6 can reach to 0.0600 and 36.92% for BSA and 0.0613 and 37.67% for WSA, and those of GLASS V04 can reach to 0.0567 and 36.28% for BSA and 0.0540 and 35.72% respectively.

Validation of satellite albedo products is an essential step because their quantitative application lie in their ability to record the real state of the earth surface. Upscaling in situ measurements to the corresponding pixel scale is necessary due to the spatial scale mismatch between in situ and satellite measurements. Machine learning-based models have been increasingly used for upscaling because they can yield more reliable results than traditional methods. Nevertheless, the main controlling factors on upscaled results have rarely been discussed. This article explores the control factors that bring uncertainties to the upscaled results based on machine learning models. Three machine learning models, including random forest (RF), $k$ -nearest neighbor (KNN), and Cubist models, were selected to upscale single site in situ -based albedo to the coarse pixel scale. The upscaled results were carefully assessed through comparison with pixel scale albedo reference. The results indicate that the accuracy of upscaled results depends on the machine learning models, the inclusion of key variables related to albedo, the dataset selection of these variables, the amount of training data, and the sensitivity of machine learning models to these factors. Despite the dependence on control factors, the machine learning-based upscaling methods generally have excellent applicability across different spatial scales and over other untrained areas. Therefore, they open the door to generating a time series of globally, spatially continuous distributed reference datasets with sufficient length, consistency, and continuity to adequately fulfill the requirement of a comprehensive validation.

Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been used as an indicator for the photosynthetic activity of vegetation at regional and global scales. Canopy structure affects the radiative transfer process of SIF within canopy and causes the angular-dependencies of SIF. A common solution for interpreting these effects is the use of physically-based radiative transfer models. As a first step, a comprehensive evaluation of the three-dimensional (3D) radiative transfers is needed using ground truth biological and hyperspectral remote sensing measurements. Due to the complexity of forest modeling, few studies have systematically investigated the effect of canopy structural factors and sun-target-viewing geometry on SIF. In this study, we evaluated the capability of the Fluorescence model with the Weighted Photon Spread method (FluorWPS) to simulate at-sensor radiance and SIF at the top of canopy, and identified the influence of the canopy structural factors and sun-target-viewing geometry on the magnitude and directional response of SIF in deciduous forests. To evaluate the model, a 3D forest scene was first constructed from Goddard’s LiDAR Hyperspectral and Thermal (G-LiHT) LiDAR data. The reliability of the reconstructed scene was confirmed by comparing the calculated leaf area index with the measured ones from the scene, which resulted in a relative error of 3.5%. Then, the performance of FluorWPS was evaluated by comparing the simulated at-sensor radiance spectra with the spectra measured from the DUAL and FLUO spectrometer of HyPlant. The radiance spectra simulated by FluorWPS agreed well with the measured spectra by the two high-performance imaging spectrometers, with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.998 and 0.926, respectively. SIF simulated by the FluorWPS model agreed well with the values of the DART model. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effect of the canopy structural parameters and sun-target-viewing geometry on SIF. The maximum difference of the total SIF can be as large as 45% and 47% at the wavelengths of 685 nm and 740 nm for different foliage area volume densities (FAVDs), and 48% and 46% for fractional vegetation covers (FVCs), respectively. Leaf angle distribution has a markedly influence on the magnitude of SIF, with a ratio of emission part to SIF range from 0.48 to 0.72. SIF from the grass layer under the tree contributed 10%+ more to the top of canopy SIF even for a dense forest canopy (FAVD = 3.5 m⁻¹, FVC = 76%). The red SIF at the wavelength of 685 nm had a similar shape to the far-red SIF at a wavelength of 740 nm but with higher variability in varying illumination conditions. The integration of the FluorWPS model and LiDAR modeling can greatly improve the interpretation of SIF at different scales and angular configurations.

Forest serves as an important component of the land surface ecosystem as well as terrestrial biosphere, thus playing a crucial role in the global and regional carbon cycle.¹ Forest canopy structures determine the transmittance of sunlight in the canopy and are able to affect the major physiological processes of vegetation (such as photosynthesis, transpiration, nitrogen cycle, and so on) as well as the energy exchange and circulation between vegetation and atmosphere.^2,3 Additionally, the forest canopy structures are also significant for the forest vegetation net primary productivity.⁴ Consequently, the quantitative description of forest canopy structure is significant for the investigation and management of forest resources and can further contribute to the assessment of aboveground biomass, hence benefits more accurate estimation of forest carbon sinks. Thus it could provide strong support for the study of carbon cycle.

The maturity and affordability of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors have made possible the quick acquisition of 3D point cloud data to monitor phenotypic traits of vegetation canopies. However, while the majority of studies focused on the retrieval of macro scale parameters of vegetation, there are few studies addressing the reconstruction of explicit 3D structures from terrestrial LiDAR data and the retrieval of fine scale parameters from such structures. A challenging problem that arises from the latter studies is the need for a large amount of data to represent the various components in the actual canopy, which can be time consuming and resource intensive for processing and for further applications. In this study, we present a pipeline to reconstruct the 3D maize structures composed of triangle primitives based on multi-view terrestrial LiDAR measurements. We then study the sensitivity of the details with which the canopy architecture was represented for the computation of leaf angle distribution (LAD), leaf area index (LAI), gap fraction, and directional reflectance factors (DRF). Based on point clouds of a maize field in three stages of growth, we reconstructed the reference structures, which have the maximum number of triangles. To get a compromise between the details of the structure and accuracy reserved for later applications, we carried out a simplified process to have multiple configurations of details based on the decimation rate and the Hausdorff distance. Results show that LAD is not highly sensitive to the details of the structure (or the number of triangles). However, LAI, gap fraction, and DRF are more sensitive, and require a relatively high number of triangles. A choice of 100−500 triangles per leaf while maintaining the overall shapes of the leaves and a low Hausdorff distance is suggested as a good compromise to represent the canopy and give an overall accuracy of 98% for the computation of the various parameters.