Paulo Guirro Laurence

Dr. Paulo Guirro Laurence

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 May 2020 in Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPaulo Guirro Laurence
Paulo Guirro Laurence
YBYuri Busin
Yuri Busin
HLHelena Scoz da Cunha Lima
Helena Scoz da Cunha Lima
EMElizeu Coutinho Macedo
Elizeu Coutinho Macedo
Predictors of problematic smartphone use have been found mainly in studies on elementary and high school students. Few studies have focused on predictors related to social network and messaging apps or smartphone model. Thus, the objective of our study was to identify predictors of problematic smartphone use related to demographic characteristics, loneliness, social app use, and smartphone model among university students. This cross-sectional study involved 257 Brazilian university students who answered a smartphone addiction scale, a questionnaire about smartphone usage patterns, and the Brazilian version of the UCLA-R loneliness scale. Women, iPhone owners, and users of Instagram and Snapchat had significantly higher smartphone addiction scores. We found correlations between scores for the Brazilian version of smartphone addiction scale and the importance attributed to WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat, and the Brazilian version of the UCLA-R loneliness scale. Our hierarchical regression model predicted 32.2% of the scores of the Brazilian version of the smartphone addiction scale, with the greatest increase in predictive capability by the step that added smartphone social app importance, followed by the step that added loneliness. Adding the smartphone model produced the smallest increase in predictive capability. The theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.

26 February 2020 in Journal of Eye Movement Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ŠKŠimon Kucharský
Šimon Kucharský
IVIngmar Visser
Ingmar Visser
GTGabriela-Olivia Truțescu
Gabriela-Olivia Truțescu
PLPaulo Guirro Laurence
Paulo Guirro Laurence
MZMartina Zaharieva
Martina Zaharieva
MRMaartje Raijmakers
Maartje Raijmakers
In cognitive tasks, solvers can adopt different strategies to process information which may lead to different response behavior. These strategies might elicit different eye movement patterns which can thus provide substantial information about the strategy a person uses. However, these strategies are usually hidden and need to be inferred from the data. After an overview of existing techniques which use eye movement data for the identification of latent cognitive strategies, we present a relatively easy to apply unsupervised method to cluster eye movement recordings to detect groups of different solution processes that are applied in solving the task. We test the method's performance using simulations and demonstrate its use on two examples of empirical data. Our analyses are in line with presence of different solving strategies in a Mastermind game, and suggest new insights to strategic patterns in solving Progressive matrices tasks.

21 March 2018 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PLPaulo Guirro Laurence
Paulo Guirro Laurence
TMTatiana P. Mecca
Tatiana P. Mecca
ASAlexandre Serpa
Alexandre Serpa
RMRomain Martin
Romain Martin
EMElizeu C. Macedo
Elizeu C. Macedo
Eye movements help to infer the cognitive strategy that a person uses in fluid intelligence tests. However, intelligence tests demand different relations/rules tokens to be solved, such as rule direction, which is the continuation, variation or overlay of geometric figures in the matrix of the intelligence test. The aim of this study was to understand whether eye movements could predict the outcome of an intelligence test and in the rule item groups. Furthermore, we sought to identify which measure is best for predicting intelligence test scores and to understand if the rule item groups use the same strategy. Accordingly, 34 adults completed a computerized intelligence test with an eye-tracking device. The toggling rate, that is, the number of toggles on each test item equalized by the item latency explained 45% of the variance of the test scores and a significant amount of the rule tokens item groups. The regression analyses also indicated toggling rate as the best measure for predicting the score and that all the rule tokens seem to respect the same strategy. No correlation or difference were found between baseline pupil size and fluid intelligence. Wiener Matrizen-Test 2 was demonstrated to be a good instrument for the purpose of this study. Finally, the implications of these findings for an understanding of cognition are discussed.

27 May 2020 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPatrícia Botelho da Silva
Patrícia Botelho da Silva
PAPascale M. J. Engel de Abreu
Pascale M. J. Engel de Abreu
PLPaulo Guirro Laurence
Paulo Guirro Laurence
MNMaria Ângela Nogueira Nico
Maria Ângela Nogueira Nico
LSLuiz Gustavo Varejão Simi
Luiz Gustavo Varejão Simi
EMElizeu Macedo
Elizeu Macedo
Many studies have shown that children with reading difficulties present deficits in rapid automatized naming (RAN) and phonological awareness skills. The aim of this study was to examine RAN and explicit phonological processing in Brazilian Portuguese–speaking children with developmental dyslexia and to explore the ability of RAN to discriminate between children with and without dyslexia. Participants were 30 children with a clinical diagnosis of dyslexia established by the Brazilian Dyslexia Association and 30 children with typical development. Children were aged between 7 and 12, and groups were matched for chronological age and sex. They completed a battery of tests that are commonly used in Brazil for diagnosing dyslexia, consisting of the Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children (WISC-IV) as well as tests of single word and non-word reading, RAN, and the profile of phonological abilities test. Results indicate that the cognitive profile of this group of children, with a clinical diagnosis of dyslexia, showed preserved skills in the four subscales of the WISC-IV (verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed) and on the profile of phonological abilities test. Groups significantly differed on the reading tests (word and non-word) and RAN measures, with medium to large effect sizes for RAN. Classification and regression tree analysis revealed that RAN was a good predictor for dyslexia diagnosis, with an overall classification accuracy rate of 88.33%.

5 August 2022 in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPaulo Guirro Laurence
Paulo Guirro Laurence
EMElizeu Coutinho Macedo
Elizeu Coutinho Macedo

20 April 2023 in Journal of Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPaulo Guirro Laurence
Paulo Guirro Laurence
TJTatiana Abrão Jana
Tatiana Abrão Jana
SBSilvia A. Bunge
Silvia A. Bunge
EMElizeu Macedo
Elizeu Macedo
Sequences of eye movements during performance of a reasoning task has provided insights into the strategies individuals use to solve that specific task; however, prior studies have not examined whether eye gaze metrics reflect cognitive abilities in a way that transcends a specific task. Thus, our study aimed to explore the relationship between eye movement sequences and other behavioral measures. Here, we present two studies that related different eye gaze metrics in a matrix reasoning task with performance on a different test of fluid reasoning and tests of planning, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Additionally, we related gaze metrics to self-reported executive functioning in daily life, as measured by BRIEF-A. To perform this, we classified the participants’ eye gaze in each item of the matrices test using an algorithm and then used LASSO regression models with the cognitive abilities as the dependent variable to select eye-tracking metrics to predict it. Overall, specific and distinct eye gaze metrics predicted 57% variance in the fluid reasoning scores; 17% variance in the planning scores; and 18% variance in the working memory scores. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that the selected eye-tracking metrics reflect cognitive abilities that transcend specific tasks.