Antonio Ivan Lazzarino

Dr. Antonio Ivan Lazzarino

Imperial College, London, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 December 2009 in Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDaniela Porta
Daniela Porta
SMSimona Milani
Simona Milani
ALAntonio Ivan Lazzarino
Antonio Ivan Lazzarino
CPCarlo A Perucci
Carlo A Perucci
FFFrancesco Forastiere
Francesco Forastiere
Background: Management of solid waste (mainly landfills and incineration) releases a number of toxic substances, most in small quantities and at extremely low levels. Because of the wide range of pollutants, the different pathways of exposure, long-term low-level exposure, and the potential for synergism among the pollutants, concerns remain about potential health effects but there are many uncertainties involved in the assessment. Our aim was to systematically review the available epidemiological literature on the health effects in the vicinity of landfills and incinerators and among workers at waste processing plants to derive usable excess risk estimates for health impact assessment. Methods: We examined the published, peer-reviewed literature addressing health effects of waste management between 1983 and 2008. For each paper, we examined the study design and assessed potential biases in the effect estimates. We evaluated the overall evidence and graded the associated uncertainties. Results: In most cases the overall evidence was inadequate to establish a relationship between a specific waste process and health effects; the evidence from occupational studies was not sufficient to make an overall assessment. For community studies, at least for some processes, there was limited evidence of a causal relationship and a few studies were selected for a quantitative evaluation. In particular, for populations living within two kilometres of landfills there was limited evidence of congenital anomalies and low birth weight with excess risk of 2 percent and 6 percent, respectively. The excess risk tended to be higher when sites dealing with toxic wastes were considered. For populations living within three kilometres of old incinerators, there was limited evidence of an increased risk of cancer, with an estimated excess risk of 3.5 percent. The confidence in the evaluation and in the estimated excess risk tended to be higher for specific cancer forms such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and soft tissue sarcoma than for other cancers. Conclusions: The studies we have reviewed suffer from many limitations due to poor exposure assessment, ecological level of analysis, and lack of information on relevant confounders. With a moderate level confidence, however, we have derived some effect estimates that could be used for health impact assessment of old landfill and incineration plants. The uncertainties surrounding these numbers should be considered carefully when health effects are estimated. It is clear that future research into the health risks of waste management needs to overcome current limitations.

20 October 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAndrew Steptoe
Andrew Steptoe
RHRuth A. Hackett
Ruth A. Hackett
ALAntonio Ivan Lazzarino
Antonio Ivan Lazzarino
SBSophie Bostock
Sophie Bostock
RMRoberto La Marca
Roberto La Marca
MHMark Hamer
Mark Hamer
Significance: Our observations provide evidence to link epidemiological studies implicating stress-related processes with biological dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. The patterns of cardiovascular, inflammatory, neuroendocrine, and cholesterol responses exemplify the disturbances of reactivity and recovery predicted by the allostatic load model, including prolonged responses to stress due to delayed shutdown of physiological reactivity, and inadequate (blunted) responses resulting in compensatory hyperactivity in other mediating pathways. Chronic allostatic load may be a mechanism through which stress exposures contribute to diabetes risk, while also being implicated in the adverse health consequences of diabetes such as coronary heart disease and cognitive decline.

1 August 2010 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAntonio Ivan Lazzarino
Antonio Ivan Lazzarino
KNKamal Nagpal
Kamal Nagpal
ABAlex Bottle
Alex Bottle
OFOmar Faiz
Omar Faiz
KMKrishna Moorthy
Krishna Moorthy
PAPaul Aylin
Paul Aylin
To assess the trends in uptake of minimal invasive esophagectomy in England over the last 12 years (1996/1997–2007/2008) and to compare their clinical outcomes with those after open esophagectomy. Around 7400 people are affected each year in the United Kingdom. Prognosis following esophageal resection is, however, poor. Even after “curative” surgery, 5-year survival rates do not exceed 25%. The minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy has attracted attention as a potentially less invasive alternative to conventional surgery. Data on patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were extracted from a national administrative database. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, 30-day in-hospital mortality, 30-day total (ie, in and out of hospital) mortality, 365-day total mortality, 28-day emergency readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify the effect of minimal invasive esophagectomy (MIE) on the outcomes after adjustment for age, gender, socioeconomic deprivation, and comorbidity. A total of 18,673 esophagectomies were performed over the 12-year study period. The use of minimal access surgery increased exponentially over time (from 0.6% in 1996/1997 to 16.0% in 2007/2008). There was a suggestion that patients undergoing MIE had better 1-year survival rates than patients receiving open esophagectomy (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46–1.01, P = 0.058). The uptake of MIE in England is increasing exponentially. With the possible exception of 1-year survival, patients selected for MIE demonstrated similar mortality and length of stay outcomes when compared with those undergoing conventional surgery. These results need to be confirmed in large-scale randomized controlled trials.

1 October 2013 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAntonio Ivan Lazzarino
Antonio Ivan Lazzarino
MHMark Hamer
Mark Hamer
DGDavid Gaze
David Gaze
PCPaul Collinson
Paul Collinson
ASAndrew Steptoe
Andrew Steptoe
The objective of this study was to examine the association between cortisol response to mental stress and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in healthy older individuals without history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Mental stress is a recognized risk factor for CVD, although the mechanisms remain unclear. Cortisol, a key stress hormone, is associated with coronary atherosclerosis and may accentuate structural and functional cardiac disease. This cross-sectional study involved 508 disease-free men and women aged 53 to 76 years drawn from the Whitehall II epidemiological cohort. We evaluated salivary cortisol response to standardized mental stress tests (exposure) and hs-cTnT plasma concentration using a high-sensitivity assay (outcome). We measured coronary calcification using electron-beam dual-source computed tomography and Agatston scores. After adjustment for demographic and clinical variables associated with CVD as well as for inflammatory factors, we found a robust association between cortisol response and detectable hs-cTnT (odds ratio [OR]: 3.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60 to 9.92; p = 0.003). The association remained when we restricted the analysis to participants without coronary calcification (n = 222; OR: 4.77; 95% CI: 1.22 to 18.72; p = 0.025) or when we further adjusted for coronary calcification in participants with positive Agatston scores (n = 286; OR: 7.39; 95% CI: 2.22 to 26.24; p = 0.001). We found that heightened cortisol response to mental stress was associated with detectable plasma levels of cTnT using high-sensitivity assays in healthy participants, independently of coronary atherosclerosis. Further research is needed to understand the role of psychosocial stress in the pathophysiology of cardiac cell damage.

26 August 2010 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElaine M Burns
Elaine M Burns
HNHaris Naseem
Haris Naseem
ABAlex Bottle
Alex Bottle
ALAntonio Ivan Lazzarino
Antonio Ivan Lazzarino
PAPaul Aylin
Paul Aylin
OFOmar Faiz
Omar Faiz
Objectives To describe national trends in bariatric surgery and examine the factors influencing outcome in bariatric surgery in England. Design Observational population cohort study. Setting Hospital Episode Statistics database. Participants All patients who had primary gastric bypass, gastric banding, or sleeve gastrectomy procedures between April 2000 and March 2008. Main outcome measures 30 day mortality, mortality at one year after surgery, unplanned readmission to hospitalwithin 28 days, and duration of stay in hospital. Results 6953 primary bariatric procedures were carried out during the study period, of which 3649 were gastric band procedures, 3191 were gastric bypass procedures, and 113 were sleeve gastrectomy procedures. A marked increase occurred in the numbers of bariatric procedures done, from 238 in 2000 to 2543 in 2007, with an increase in the percentage of laparoscopic procedures over the study period (28% (66/238) laparoscopic procedures in 2000 compared with 74.5% (1894/2543) in 2007). Overall, 0.3% (19/6953) patients died within 30 days of surgery. The median length of stay in hospital was 3 (interquartile range 2-6) days. An unplanned readmission to hospital within 28 days of surgery occurred in 8% (556/6953) of procedures. No significant increase in mortality or unplanned readmission was seen over the study period, despite the exponential increase in minimal access surgery and consequently bariatric surgery. Conclusions Bariatric surgery has increased exponentially in England. Although postoperative weight loss and reoperation rates were not evaluated in this observational population cohort study, patients selected for gastric banding had lower postoperative mortality and readmission rates and a shorter length of stay than did those selected for gastric bypass.

1 April 2013 in Psychosomatic Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAntonio Ivan Lazzarino
Antonio Ivan Lazzarino
MHMark Hamer
Mark Hamer
ESEmmanuel Stamatakis
Emmanuel Stamatakis
ASAndrew Dsc Steptoe
Andrew Dsc Steptoe
Background The purpose of this study was to test whether lower socioeconomic status (SES) augments the effect of psychological distress on mortality from stroke or coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods We prospectively linked data from 66,500 participants 35 years or older in the Health Survey for England, selected using stratified random sampling from 1994 to 2004, and free of cardiovascular disease and cancer at baseline, with mortality records. The median follow-up time was 7.9 years. SES was indexed by occupational class, and psychological distress was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Results After adjustment for demographic and clinical variables, both psychological distress and low SES were associated with increased mortality: the hazard ratios (HR) for one-category increase in low SES (three categories in total) were 1.15 for stroke-death (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00–1.31, p = .043) and 1.24 for CHD-death (95% CI = 1.09–1.41, p = .001); the HR for one-category increase in GHQ-12 (three categories in total) was 1.18 for stroke-death (95% CI = 1.07–1.30, p = .001) and 1.24 for CHD-death (95% CI = 1.13–1.36, p < .001). In stratified analyses, the strongest associations were found in the lowest SES categories: the HR for GHQ-12 toward stroke-death was 1.15 in high-SES participants (95% CI = 0.97–1.37, p = .107) and 1.31 in low-SES ones (95% CI = 1.13–1.51, p < .001); the HR for GHQ-12 toward CHD-death was 1.10 in high-SES participants (95% CI = 0.97–1.25, p = .129) and 1.33 in low-SES ones (95% CI = 1.19–1.48, p < .001). Conclusions People in low socioeconomic circumstances are more vulnerable to the adverse effect of psychological distress. This pattern should be taken into account when evaluating the association between psychosocial variables and health outcomes.