Davood Darban-Sarokhalil

Dr. Davood Darban-Sarokhalil


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 July 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAref Shariati
Aref Shariati
MDMasoud Dadashi
Masoud Dadashi
MMMajid Taati Moghadam
Majid Taati Moghadam
ABAlex van Belkum
Alex van Belkum
SYSomayeh Yaslianifard
Somayeh Yaslianifard
DDDavood Darban-Sarokhalil
Davood Darban-Sarokhalil
Vancomycin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(VRSA), Vancomycin-intermediateS. aureus(VISA) and heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) are subject to vancomycin treatment failure. The aim of the present study was to determine their precise prevalence and investigate prevalence variability depending on different years and locations. Several international databases including Medline (PubMed), Embase and Web of Sciences were searched (data from 1997 to 2019) to identify studies that addressed the prevalence of VRSA, VISA and hVISA among human clinical isolates around the world. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to indicate potential source of variation. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 14.0). Data analysis showed that VRSA, VISA and hVISA isolates were reported in 23, 50 and 82 studies, with an overall prevalence of 1.5% among 5855S. aureusisolates, 1.7% among 22,277 strains and 4.6% among 47,721 strains, respectively. The overall prevalence of VRSA, VISA, and hVISA before 2010 was 1.2%, 1.2%, and 4%, respectively, while their prevalence after this year has reached 2.4%, 4.3%, and 5.3%. The results of this study showed that the frequency of VRSA, VISA and hVISA after 2010 represent a 2.0, 3.6 and 1.3-fold increase over prior years. In a subgroup analysis of different strain origins, the highest frequency of VRSA (3.6%) and hVISA (5.2%) was encountered in the USA while VISA (2.1%) was more prevalent in Asia. Meta-regression analysis showed significant increasing of VISA prevalence in recent years (pvalue ≤ 0.05). Based on the results of case reports (which were not included in the calculations mentioned above), the numbers of VRSA, VISA and hVISA isolates were 12, 24 and 14, respectively, among different continents. Since the prevalence of VRSA, VISA and hVISA has been increasing in recent years (especially in the Asian and American continents), rigorous monitoring of vancomycin treatment, it’s the therapeutic response and the definition of appropriate control guidelines depending on geographical regions is highly recommended and essential to prevent the further spread of vancomycin-resistantS. aureus.

22 April 2020 in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAref Shariati
Aref Shariati
MDMasoud Dadashi
Masoud Dadashi
ZCZahra Chegini
Zahra Chegini
ABAlex van Belkum
Alex van Belkum
MMMehdi Mirzaii
Mehdi Mirzaii
DDDavood Darban-Sarokhalil
Davood Darban-Sarokhalil
Objective: Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MRCoNS) are among the main causes of nosocomial infections, which have caused major problems in recent years due to continuously increasing spread of various antibiotic resistance features. Apparently, vancomycin is still an effective antibiotic for treatment of infections caused by these bacteria but in recent years, additional resistance phenotypes have led to the accelerated introduction of newer agents such as linezolid, tigecycline, daptomycin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D). Due to limited data availability on the global rate of resistance to these antibiotics, in the present study, the resistance rates ofS. aureus, Methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA), and CoNS to these antibiotics were collected.Method: Several databases including web of science, EMBASE, and Medline (via PubMed), were searched (September 2018) to identify those studies that address MRSA, and CONS resistance to linezolid, tigecycline, daptomycin, and Q/D around the world.Result: Most studies that reported resistant staphylococci were from the United States, Canada, and the European continent, while African and Asian countries reported the least resistance to these antibiotics. Our results showed that linezolid had the best inhibitory effect onS. aureus.Although resistances to this antibiotic have been reported from different countries, however, due to the high volume of the samples and the low number of resistance, in terms of statistical analyzes, the resistance to this antibiotic is zero.Moreover, linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline effectively (99.9%) inhibit MRSA. Studies have shown that CoNS with 0.3% show the lowest resistance to linezolid and daptomycin, while analyzes introduced tigecycline with 1.6% resistance as the least effective antibiotic for these bacteria. Finally, MRSA and CoNS had a greater resistance to Q/D with 0.7 and 0.6%, respectively and due to its significant side effects and drug-drug interactions; it appears that its use is subject to limitations.Conclusion: The present study shows that resistance to new agents is low in staphylococci and these antibiotics can still be used for treatment of staphylococcal infections in the world.

12 February 2018 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PAParisa Asadollahi
Parisa Asadollahi
NFNarges Nodeh Farahani
Narges Nodeh Farahani
MMMehdi Mirzaii
Mehdi Mirzaii
SKSeyed Sajjad Khoramrooz
Seyed Sajjad Khoramrooz
ABAlex van Belkum
Alex van Belkum
DDDavood Darban-Sarokhalil
Davood Darban-Sarokhalil
Background: Staphylococcus aureus, a leading cause of community-acquired and nosocomial infections, remains a major health problem worldwide. Molecular typing methods, such as spa typing, are vital for the control and, when typing can be made more timely, prevention of S. aureus spread around healthcare settings. The current study aims to review the literature to report the most common clinical spa types around the world, which is important for epidemiological surveys and nosocomial infection control policies. Methods: A search via PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Scopus was conducted for original articles reporting the most prevalent spa types among S. aureus isolates. The search terms were “Staphylococcus aureus, spa typing.” Results: The most prevalent spa types were t032, t008 and t002 in Europe; t037 and t002 in Asia; t008, t002, and t242 in America; t037, t084, and t064 in Africa; and t020 in Australia. In Europe, all the isolates related to spa type t032 were MRSA. In addition, spa type t037 in Africa and t037and t437 in Australia also consisted exclusively of MRSA isolates. Given the fact that more than 95% of the papers we studied originated in the past decade there was no option to study the dynamics of regional clone emergence. Conclusion: This review documents the presence of the most prevalent spa types in countries, continents and worldwide and shows big local differences in clonal distribution.

10 September 2021 in Frontiers in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMasoud Dadashi
Masoud Dadashi
PSParastoo Sharifian
Parastoo Sharifian
NBNazila Bostanshirin
Nazila Bostanshirin
BHBahareh Hajikhani
Bahareh Hajikhani
NBNarjess Bostanghadiri
Narjess Bostanghadiri
DDDavood Darban-Sarokhalil
Davood Darban-Sarokhalil
Background and Aim: The predominant species of the Enterococcus, Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) cause great variety of infections. Therefore, the expansion of antimicrobial resistance in the Enterococcus is one of the most important global concerns. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of resistance to linezolid, tigecycline, and daptomycin among enterococcal strains isolated from human clinical specimens worldwide.Methods: Several databases including Web of Science, EMBASE, and Medline (via PubMed), were carefully searched and reviewed for original research articles available in databases and published between 2000 and 2020. A total of 114 studies worldwide that address E. faecalis and E. faecium resistance to linezolid, tigecycline, and daptomycin were analyzed by STATA software.Results: The overall prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. faecalis and E. faecium was reported to be 0.9 and 0.6%, respectively. E. faecalis and E. faecium were more resistant to the linezolid (2.2%) and daptomycin (9%), respectively. The prevalence of tigecyline-resistant E. facium (1%) strains was higher than E. faecalis strains (0.3%). Accordingly, the prevalence of linezolid-resistant E. faecalis was higher in Asia (2.8%), while linezolid-resistant E. faecium was higher in the America (3.4%). Regarding tigecycline-resistance, a higher prevalence of E. faecalis (0.4%) and E. faecium (3.9%) was reported in Europe.Conclusion: In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows that there is an emerging resistance in Enterococcus strains. Despite the rising resistance of enterococci to antibiotics, our results demonstrate that tigecycline, daptomycin, and linezolid can still be used for the treatment of enterococcal infections worldwide.

28 February 2024 in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNarjess Bostanghadiri
Narjess Bostanghadiri
NNNegar Narimisa
Negar Narimisa
MMMaryam Mirshekar
Maryam Mirshekar
LDLeila Dadgar-Zankbar
Leila Dadgar-Zankbar
ETElahe Taki
Elahe Taki
DDDavood Darban-Sarokhalil
Davood Darban-Sarokhalil
Introduction: The development of colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii during treatment has been identified in certain patients, often leading to prolonged or recurrent infections. As colistin, is the last line of therapy for A. baumannii infections that are resistant to almost all other antibiotics, colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains currently represent a significant public health threat, particularly in healthcare settings where there is significant selective pressure. Aim: The aim of this study was to comprehensively determine the prevalence of colistin resistance in A. baumannii from clinical samples. Regional differences in these rates were also investigated using subgroup analyses. Method: The comprehensive search was conducted using “Acinetobacter baumannii”, “Colistin resistant” and all relevant keywords. A systematic literature search was performed after searching in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to April 25, 2023. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software version 17 and sources of heterogeneity were evaluated using I2. The potential for publication bias was explored using Egger's tests. A total of 30,307 articles were retrieved. After a thorough evaluation, 734 studies were finally eligible for inclusion in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. Result: According to the results, the prevalence of resistance to colistin among A. baumannii isolates was 4% (95% CI 3–5%), which has increased significantly from 2% before 2011 to 5% after 2012. South America had the highest resistance rate to this antibiotic. The broth microdilution method had the highest level of resistance, while the agar dilution showed the lowest level. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found a low prevalence of colistin resistance among A. baumannii isolates responsible for infections worldwide from 2000 to 2023. However, there is a high prevalence of colistin-resistant isolates in certain countries. This implies an urgent public health threat, as colistin is one of the last antibiotics available for the treatment of infections caused by XDR strains of A. baumannii.

1 November 2019 in Infection and Drug Resistance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMohsen Heidary
Mohsen Heidary
SBSaeed Zaker Bostanabad
Saeed Zaker Bostanabad
SASeyed Mohammad Amini
Seyed Mohammad Amini
AJAlireza Jafari
Alireza Jafari
MNMostafa Ghalami Nobar
Mostafa Ghalami Nobar
DDDavood Darban-Sarokhalil
Davood Darban-Sarokhalil
Background: Nowadays, tuberculosis (TB) is one of the top ten leading causes of mortality worldwide. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) – and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) – Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) is identified as one of the most challenging threats to TB control. Thus, new and safe nano-drugs are urgently required for the elimination of TB. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-bacterial effects of Ag, ZnO, and Ag-ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) on MDR- and XDR-M. tuberculosis. Materials and methods: In this study, Ag, ZnO, and Ag-ZnO NPs were synthesized by the chemical reduction and chemical deposition methods. NPs were characterized using ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, and transmission electron microscopy. Then, various dilutions of NPs were prepared and their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined against M. tuberculosis strains using the broth microdilution and agar microdilution methods. Finally, MTT test and cell culture assay were performed. Results: The effects of concentrations of 1–128 μg/mL Ag NPs, ZnO NPs, 2Ag: 8ZnO, 8Ag:2ZnO, 3Ag: 7ZnO, 7Ag:3ZnO, and 5Ag:5ZnO on M. tuberculosis strains were investigated. MIC results showed the inhibitory effect of 1 μg/mL of all NPs against XDR-M. tuberculosis. In addition, the concentrations of 4 μg/mL Ag, 8 μg/mL 5Ag:5ZnO, 8 μg/mL 7Ag:3ZnO, 32 μg/mL 3Ag:7ZnO, 16 μg/mL 8Ag:2ZnO, and 64 μg/mL 2Ag:8ZnO inhibited MDR-M. tuberculosis growth. However, MBC results indicated the inability of Ag, ZnO and Ag-ZnO NPs, either in combination or alone, to kill MDR- or XDR-M. tuberculosis. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the effects of Ag and ZnO NPs against MDR and XDR strains of M. tuberculosis. According to the results, Ag and ZnO NPs showed bacteriostatic effects against drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis. Therefore, these NPs may be considered as promising anti-mycobacterial nano-drugs. However, further studies are required to affirm the bactericidal effects of these NPs against TB.