Shoshanah Jacobs

Dr. Shoshanah Jacobs

Department of Integrative Biology and Office of Educational Scholarship and Practice, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJustine Ammendolia
Justine Ammendolia
JSJacquelyn Saturno
Jacquelyn Saturno
ABAmy L. Brooks
Amy L. Brooks
Shoshanah JacobsShoshanah Jacobs
Shoshanah Jacobs
JJJenna R. Jambeck
Jenna R. Jambeck

1 June 2017 in Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KWKristina Wanieck
Kristina Wanieck
PFPierre-Emmanuel Fayemi
Pierre-Emmanuel Fayemi
Nicolas MaranzanaNicolas Maranzana
Nicolas Maranzana
CZCordt Zollfrank
Cordt Zollfrank
Shoshanah JacobsShoshanah Jacobs
Shoshanah Jacobs
Biomimetics, as the transfer of strategies from biology to technology, is an emerging research area and has led to significant concepts over the past decades. The development of such concepts is described by the process of biomimetics, encompassing several steps. In Practice, beneficiaries of the process face challenges. Therefore, to overcome challenges and to facilitate the steps, tools have been developed in various areas, such as engineering, computing and design. However, these tools are not widely used yet. This paper presents an overview and a classification study of more than 40 tools with qualitative criteria. The criteria included, for example, the year of development, the accessibility of tools, the facilitated steps of the process or their contribution to sustainability. The classification shows that certain steps of the process and their challenges are well addressed by the tools, while other steps are not. The presented results contribute to the proposal of an improvement of the state of the art, and they build the foundation for future theoretical and practical analyses. These findings could contribute to increasing the implementation of biomimetics in various disciplines in the long term.

8 October 2014 in Journal of Mechanical Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Shoshanah JacobsShoshanah Jacobs
Shoshanah Jacobs
ENEmily C. Nichol
Emily C. Nichol
MHMichael E. Helms
Michael E. Helms
We present the BioM Innovation Database, the first of its kind containing detailed information about global biomimetic activity. We present a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the database to address the following questions: (1) Are products, which are identified as being the result of biologically inspired design (BID), actually BID and to what extent do they use biomimicry terminology in their descriptions by the designers? (2) To what extent do BID products mimic the forms, processes and interactions of biological systems? (3) To what extent do BID products exploit the scale and range of biological systems? (4) What patterns of design practice can we learn from successful BID practitioners?

14 February 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJacques Chirazi
Jacques Chirazi
KWKristina Wanieck
Kristina Wanieck
PFPierre-Emmanuel Fayemi
Pierre-Emmanuel Fayemi
CZCordt Zollfrank
Cordt Zollfrank
Shoshanah JacobsShoshanah Jacobs
Shoshanah Jacobs
Biologically inspired design (BID) is an emerging field of research with increasing achievements in engineering for design and problem solving. Its economic, societal, and ecological impact is considered to be significant. However, the number of existing products and success stories is still limited when compared to the knowledge that is available from biology and BID research. This article describes success factors for BID solutions, from the design process to the commercialization process, based on case studies and market analyses of biologically inspired products. Furthermore, the paper presents aspects of an effective knowledge transfer from science to industrial application, based on interviews with industrial partners. The accessibility of the methodological approach has led to promising advances in BID in practice. The findings can be used to increase the number of success stories by providing key steps toward the implementation and commercialization of BID products, and to point out necessary fields of cooperative research.

1 June 2017 in CBE—Life Sciences Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCeilidh Barlow Cash
Ceilidh Barlow Cash
Jessa LetargoJessa Letargo
Jessa Letargo
SGSteffen P. Graether
Steffen P. Graether
Shoshanah JacobsShoshanah Jacobs
Shoshanah Jacobs
Large class learning is a reality that is not exclusive to the first-year experience at midsized, comprehensive universities; upper-year courses have similarly high enrollment, with many class sizes greater than 200 students. Research into the efficacy and deficiencies of large undergraduate classes has been ongoing for more than 100 years, with most research associating large classes with weak student engagement, decreased depth of learning, and ineffective interactions. This study used a multidimensional research approach to survey student and instructor perceptions of large biology classes and to characterize the courses offered by a department according to resources and course structure using a categorical principal components analysis. Both student and instructor survey results indicated that a large class begins around 240 students. Large classes were identified as impersonal and classified using extrinsic qualifiers; however, students did identify techniques that made the classes feel smaller. In addition to the qualitative survey, we also attempted to quantify courses by collecting data from course outlines and analyzed the data using categorical principal component analysis. The analysis maps institutional change in resource allocation and teaching structure from 2010 through 2014 and validates the use of categorical principal components analysis in educational research. We examine what perceptions and factors are involved in a large class that is perceived to feel small. Our analysis suggests that it is not the addition of resources or difference in the lecturing method, but it is the instructor that determines whether a large class can feel small.

25 July 2022 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJustine Ammendolia
Justine Ammendolia
JSJacquelyn Saturno
Jacquelyn Saturno
ABAlexander L. Bond
Alexander L. Bond
NONina J. O'HAnlon
Nina J. O'HAnlon
EMElizabeth A. Masden
Elizabeth A. Masden
Shoshanah JacobsShoshanah Jacobs
Shoshanah Jacobs