The consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification of colorectal cancer is based on bulk transcriptomics. The underlying epithelial cell diversity remains unclear. We analyzed 373,058 single-cell transcriptomes from 63 patients, focusing on 49,155 epithelial cells. We identified a pervasive genetic and transcriptomic dichotomy of malignant cells, based on distinct gene expression, DNA copy number and gene regulatory network. We recapitulated these subtypes in bulk transcriptomes from 3,614 patients. The two intrinsic subtypes, iCMS2 and iCMS3, refine CMS. iCMS3 comprises microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) cancers and one-third of microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. iCMS3 MSS cancers are transcriptomically more similar to MSI-H cancers than to other MSS cancers. CMS4 cancers had either iCMS2 or iCMS3 epithelium; the latter had the worst prognosis. We defined the intrinsic epithelial axis of colorectal cancer and propose a refined ‘IMF’ classification with five subtypes, combining intrinsic epithelial subtype (I), microsatellite instability status (M) and fibrosis (F).

Purpose: This study compared the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids.Methods: PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing LH against CH in grade II/III hemorrhoids. The primary outcomes included postoperative use of analgesia, postoperative morbidity (bleeding, urinary retention, pain, thrombosis), and time of return to work/daily activities.Results: Nine studies totaling 661 patients (LH, 336 and CH, 325) were included. The LH group had shorter operative time (P<0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower in the LH group, with lower postoperative day 1 (mean difference [MD], –2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], –3.44 to –0.75; P=0.002) and postoperative day 7 (MD, –3.94; 95% CI, –6.36 to –1.52; P=0.001) visual analogue scores and use of analgesia (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42–0.81; P=0.001). The risk of postoperative bleeding was also lower in the LH group (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12– 0.28; P0.999) and prolapse (P=0.240), and the likelihood of complete resolution at 12 months, were similar (P=0.240).Conclusion: LH offers more favorable short-term clinical outcomes than CH, with reduced morbidity and pain and earlier return to work or daily activities. Medium-term symptom recurrence at 12 months was similar. Our results should be verified in future well-designed trials with larger samples.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a structured programme using a multimodal, evidence-based approach to improve post-operative outcomes. Successful implementation of ERAS can be challenging. We aimed to evaluate our initial experience with colorectal ERAS and explore the perspectives of specialist doctors and nurses. Methods: From 1 June 2017 to 31 December 2017, all patients who underwent elective colorectal resection and met the ERAS inclusion criteria at the Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, were included in the study. Short-term outcomes were compared between patients with >70% compliance to key ERAS components versus those with <= 70% compliance. Department staff were surveyed via questionnaire in July 2019. Results: Three hundred and fifteen patients were included in study. >70% ERAS compliance rate was achieved in 84 patients (26.7%). A higher compliance rate resulted in a significantly shorter length of stay of 6 (IQR 5-8) days vs. 7 (IQR 6-9.5) days (p = 0.025) and lower readmission rate of 3.6% (n = 3) vs. 4.8% (n = 11) (p = 0.042), as well as a trend towards reduced complication rate of 15.4% (n = 13) vs. 22.0% (n = 51) and earlier return to gastrointestinal function. There was a 100% questionnaire response amongst all 12 colorectal surgeons and 5 colorectal resident nurse practitioners. Conclusion: Increased adherence to the components of ERAS results in better early outcomes and may have long-term benefits on survival. Effective communication and professional support for the ERAS multi-disciplinary team, as well as understanding healthcare workers' concerns and addressing long-standing practices, is essential for successful implementation of the programme. (C) 2020 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Outcomes after natural orifice extraction vs conventional specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis