Hydrogen carriers are one of the keys to the success of using hydrogen as an energy vector. Indeed, sustainable hydrogen production exploits the excess of renewable energy sources, after which temporary storage is required. The conventional approaches to hydrogen storage and transport are compressed hydrogen (CH2) and liquefied hydrogen (LH2), which require severe operating conditions related to pressure (300–700 bar) and temperature (T < −252 °C), respectively. To overcome these issues, which have hindered market penetration, several alternatives have been proposed in the last few decades. In this review, the most promising hydrogen carriers (ammonia, methanol, liquid organic hydrogen carriers, and metal hydrides) have been considered, and the main stages of their supply chain (production, storage, transportation, H2 release, and their recyclability) have been described and critically analyzed, focusing on the latest results available in the literature, the highlighting of which is our current concern. The last section reviews recent techno-economic analyses to drive the selection of hydrogen carrier systems and the main constraints that must be considered. The analyzed results show how the selection of H2 carriers is a multiparametric function, and it depends on technological factors as well as international policies and regulations.
1 February 2015 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
A major goal of politics, society, and industry is the reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in order to prevent anthropogenic climate change and an increase in earth’s temperature. In addition, the expansion of renewable energies and the use of nuclear power, CO2 capturing (e.g. from exhaust gases), is regarded as a promising strategy to reduce global CO2 emissions. In this context, the Power-to-X technologies can provide an innovative energy storage concept by combining the main trends of energy systems aiming at high shares of renewable energies, reduction of CO2 emissions and sector coupling. A promising approach is the production of methanol as a chemical raw material or fuel. The goal of this paper is to present (i) an extensive thermodynamic analysis for the methanol production from carbon dioxide and hydrogen and (ii) an economic analysis for the process based on the thermodynamic studies. The thermodynamic analysis was carried out in the simulation tool Aspen Plus™ in order to investigate the impact of the operating temperature and pressure on the performance of the synthesis unit. Based on the thermodynamic results, an economic analysis has been performed in order to define the most feasible solution. For a defined optimal operating temperature, the fixed and operating costs and the methanol production cost were evaluated for different operating pressures. Finally, a sensitivity analysis has been performed in order to define the minimum methanol selling price that allows for a payback period of 10 years for different values of the electrical energy purchasing price.
Ammonia is a promising carbon-free energy vector, hydrogen carrier, and efficient means for long-time hydrogen storage. Power-to-ammonia-to-power concepts, powered exclusively by electricity from renewable sources, will leave the carbon economy behind and enter a truly renewable era. However, the fluctuating nature of renewables requires a good dynamic behavior of such concepts. Employing the software Aspen Plus Dynamics®, this paper investigates the dynamic behavior of a novel containerized power-to-ammonia solution to be tested at the University of Genova in 2023. Implementing a novel kinetic reaction model, the impacts of several deviations from the optimal values of the cycle parameters are investigated. The simulations provide practical guidance on how to best and safely operate the cycle. A total of ten scenarios were simulated, of which six are acceptable, two are desirable, and two should be avoided. However, all scenarios can be safely controlled by the control infrastructure.
In this paper, two different power-to-fuel solutions for sustainable fuel synthesis are investigated from the energetic, environmental, and economic standpoints. Both the solutions consider a pressurized PEM electrolysis section, fed by renewable sources, where high purity green Hydrogen is produced. Then, two separate processes are investigated for the synthesis of two distinct chemicals. In the first case, the hydrogen is mixed with CO2, sequestered by an industrial plant, and captured a carbon capture system (CCS): the two gases are sent to a pressurized reactor for methanol synthesis. In the second case, the hydrogen is mixed with N2, obtained from an industrial air separation unit (ASU), and sent to a reactor for ammonia synthesis. Both the synthesis processes are performed at high pressures and temperatures, thus a thermodynamic analysis is mandatory in order to calculate the overall efficiencies. In both cases, the power to fuel plants are investigated also in economic terms. Methanol synthesis presents a slightly higher efficiency compared to ammonia, while the two solutions are very similar from the economic standpoint. The sale of the co-produced oxygen allows for an improvement in economic terms for both cases and can be a key point in order to reach economic sustainability, together with the expected reduction in PEM electrolysers capital cost.