Raul Huertas

Dr. Raul Huertas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2009 in Plant Signaling & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRM. Pilar Rodríguez-Rosales
M. Pilar Rodríguez-Rosales
FGFrancisco J. Gálvez
Francisco J. Gálvez
RHRaul Huertas
Raul Huertas
MAM. Nieves Aranda
M. Nieves Aranda
DBDr. Mourad Baghour
Dr. Mourad Baghour
KVKees Venema
Kees Venema
Although physiological and biochemical data since long suggested that Na+/H+ and K+/H+ antiporters are involved in intracellular ion and pH regulation in plants, it has taken a long time to identif...

6 December 2012 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria J. AsinsMaria J. Asins
Maria J. Asins
IVIrene Villalta
Irene Villalta
MAMohamed M. Aly
Mohamed M. Aly
RORaquel Olías
Raquel Olías
PMPaz Álvarez DE Morales
Paz Álvarez DE Morales
Andrés BelverAndrés Belver
Andrés Belver
Control of intracellular Na+ and K+ concentrations in plant tissues under saline conditions is crucial for salt tolerance. In this study, two Na+ ‐selective class I‐HKT transporters, HKT1;1 and HKT1;2, from tomato were found to be closely linked in proximity to the position with the maximum LOD score for major QTLs in chromosome 7 (at a distance of 35 kb), thus contributing to stem and leaf Na+ and K+ in two populations of tomato RILs derived from two salt‐tolerant lines from wild tomato species S. pimpinellifolium and S. cheesmaniae. This result, together with their patterns of expression and phenotypic effects on a pair of near isogenic lines (NILs) differing in terms of HKT1‐like alleles, support the hypothesis that HKT1;1 and/or HKT1;2 genes underlies a major tomato QTL for shoot Na+ / K+ .

9 August 2016 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJavier Barrero‐Gil
Javier Barrero‐Gil
RHRaul Huertas
Raul Huertas
JRJose Luis Rambla
Jose Luis Rambla
AGAntonio Granell
Antonio Granell
JSJulio Salinas
Julio Salinas

4 April 2012 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRaul Huertas
Raul Huertas
RORaquel Olías
Raquel Olías
ZEZakia Eljakaoui
Zakia Eljakaoui
FGFrancisco Javier Gálvez
Francisco Javier Gálvez
JLJun Li
Jun Li
M. Pilar Rodríguez-RosalesM. Pilar Rodríguez-Rosales
M. Pilar Rodríguez-Rosales

23 August 2016 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
José Ángel Martín-RodríguezJosé Ángel Martín-Rodríguez
José Ángel Martín-Rodríguez
RHRaul Huertas
Raul Huertas
THTania Ho-Plágaro
Tania Ho-Plágaro
JOJuan A. Ocampo
Juan A. Ocampo
VTVeronika Turečková
Veronika Turečková
José Manuel García GarridoJosé Manuel García Garrido
José Manuel García Garrido
Plant hormones become appropriate candidates for driving functional plant mycorrhization programs, including the processes that regulate the formation of arbuscules in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis. Here, we examine the role played by ABA/GA interactions regulating the formation of AM in tomato. We report differences in ABA and GA metabolism between control and mycorrhizal roots. Active synthesis and catabolism of ABA occur in AM roots. GAs level increases as a consequence of a symbiosis-induced mechanism that requires functional arbuscules which in turn is dependent on a functional ABA pathway. A negative interaction in their metabolism has been demonstrated. ABA attenuates GA-biosynthetic and increases GA-catabolic gene expression leading to a reduction in bioactive GAs. Vice versa, GA activated ABA catabolism mainly in mycorrhizal roots. The negative impact of GA3 on arbuscule abundance in wild-type plants is partially offset by treatment with ABA and the application of a GA biosynthesis inhibitor rescued the arbuscule abundance in the ABA-deficient sitiens mutant. These findings, coupled with the evidence that ABA application leads to reduce bioactive GA1, support the hypothesis that ABA could act modifying bioactive GA level to regulate AM. Taken together, our results suggest that these hormones perform essential functions and antagonize each other by oppositely regulating AM formation in tomato roots.

22 May 2020 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEstibaliz Larrainzar
Estibaliz Larrainzar
Irene VillarIrene Villar
Irene Villar
MRMaria Carmen Rubio
Maria Carmen Rubio
CPCarmen Pérez‐Rontomé
Carmen Pérez‐Rontomé
RHRaul Huertas
Raul Huertas
Manuel BecanaManuel Becana
Manuel Becana