Fine-scale, spatial heterogeneity in soil nutrient availability can increase the growth of individual plants, the productivity of plant communities and interspecific competition. If this is due to the ability of plants to concentrate their roots where nutrient levels are high, then nutrient heterogeneity should have little effect on intraspecific competition, especially when there are no genotypic differences between individuals in root plasticity. We tested this hypothesis in a widespread, clonal species in which individual plants are known to respond to nutrient heterogeneity. Plants derived from a single clone of Alternanthera philoxeroides were grown in the greenhouse at low or high density (four or 16 plants per 27·5 × 27·5-cm container) with homogeneous or heterogeneous availability of soil nutrients, keeping total nutrient availability per container constant. After 9 weeks, measurements of size, dry mass and morphology were taken. Plants grew more in the heterogeneous than in the homogeneous treatment, showing that heterogeneity promoted performance; they grew less in the high- than in the low-density treatment, showing that plants competed. There was no interactive effect of nutrient heterogeneity and plant density, supporting the hypothesis that heterogeneity does not affect intraspecific competition in the absence of genotypic differences in plasticity. Treatments did not affect morphological characteristics such as specific leaf area or root/shoot ratio. Results indicate that fine-scale, spatial heterogeneity in the availability of soil nutrients does not increase competition when plants are genetically identical, consistent with the suggestion that effects of heterogeneity on competition depend upon differences in plasticity between individuals. Heterogeneity is only likely to increase the spread of monoclonal, invasive populations such as that of A. philoxeroides in China.

Soil heterogeneity is common in natural habitats. It may trigger foraging responses (placing more ramets and/or roots in nutrient-rich patches than in nutrient-poor patches) and further affect the growth of plants. However, the impact of soil heterogeneity on competitive interactions has been little tested. We conducted a greenhouse experiment to investigate the effects of soil heterogeneity on intraspecific competition with a stoloniferous herb Hydrocotyle vulgaris. We grew one (without competition) or nine ramets (with competition) of H. vulgaris under a homogeneous environment and two heterogeneous environments differing in patch size (large or small patches). In the heterogeneous treatment, the soil consisted of the same number of nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor patches arranged in a chessboard manner, and in the homogeneous treatment, the soil was an even mixture of the same amount of the nutrient-rich and the nutrient-poor soil. Irrespective of intraspecific competition, H. vulgaris showed foraging responses to soil heterogeneity in the large patch treatment, e.g. it produced significantly more biomass, ramets, aboveground mass and root mass in the nutrient-rich patches than in the nutrient-poor patches. In the small patch treatment, foraging responses were observed when intraspecific competition was present, but responses were not observed when there was no competition. However, we find a significant effect of soil heterogeneity on neither overall growth nor competitive intensity of H. vulgaris. Our results suggest that foraging responses to soil heterogeneity may not necessarily be adaptive and intraspecific competition may not be influenced by soil heterogeneity.