Colville Louise

Dr. Colville Louise

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 March 2014 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRowena L. Long
Rowena L. Long
MGMarta J. Gorecki
Marta J. Gorecki
MRMichael Renton
Michael Renton
JSJohn K. Scott
John K. Scott
CLColville Louise
Colville Louise
WFWilliam E. Finch‐Savage
William E. Finch‐Savage

1 August 2011 in Environmental and Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IKIlse Kranner
Ilse Kranner
CLColville Louise
Colville Louise

20 February 2013 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPTorbjørn Rage Paulsen
Torbjørn Rage Paulsen
CLColville Louise
Colville Louise
IKIlse Kranner
Ilse Kranner
MDMatthew I. Daws
Matthew I. Daws
GHGöran Högstedt
Göran Högstedt
KTKen Thompson
Ken Thompson
Summary: Historically, ‘physical dormancy’, or ‘hard seededness’, where seeds are prevented from germinating by a water‐impermeable seed coat, is viewed as a dormancy mechanism. However, upon water uptake, resumption of metabolism leads to the unavoidable release of volatile by‐products, olfactory cues that are perceived by seed predators. Here, we examine the hypothesis that hard seeds are an anti‐predator trait that evolved in response to powerful selection by small mammal seed predators. Seeds of two legume species with dimorphic seeds (‘hard’ and ‘soft’), Robinia pseudoacacia and Vicia sativa, were offered to desert hamsters (Phodopus roborovskii) in a series of seed removal studies examining the differences in seed harvest between hard and soft seeds. Volatile compounds emitted by dry and imbibed soft seeds were identified by headspace gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Fourteen main volatile compounds were identified, and hamsters readily detected both buried imbibed seeds and an artificial ‘volatile cocktail’ that mimicked the scent of imbibed seeds, but could not detect buried hard or dry soft seeds. We argue that physical dormancy has evolved to hide seeds from mammalian predators. This hypothesis also helps to explain some otherwise puzzling features of hard seeds and has implications for seed dispersal.

28 November 2014 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Manuela NagelManuela Nagel
Manuela Nagel
IKIlse Kranner
Ilse Kranner
KNKerstin Neumann
Kerstin Neumann
HRHardy Rolletschek
Hardy Rolletschek
CSCharlotte E. Seal
Charlotte E. Seal
ABAndreas Börner
Andreas Börner

19 January 2023 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JNJayanthi Nadarajan
Jayanthi Nadarajan
CWChristina Walters
Christina Walters
HPHugh W. W Pritchard
Hugh W. W Pritchard
Daniel BallesterosDaniel Ballesteros
Daniel Ballesteros
CLColville Louise
Colville Louise
The lifespan or longevity of a seed is the time period over which it can remain viable. Seed longevity is a complex trait and varies greatly between species and even seed lots of the same species. Our scientific understanding of seed longevity has advanced from anecdotal ‘Thumb Rules,’ to empirically based models, biophysical explanations for why those models sometimes work or fail, and to the profound realisation that seeds are the model of the underexplored realm of biology when water is so limited that the cytoplasm solidifies. The environmental variables of moisture and temperature are essential factors that define survival or death, as well as the timescale to measure lifespan. There is an increasing understanding of how these factors induce cytoplasmic solidification and affect glassy properties. Cytoplasmic solidification slows down, but does not stop, the chemical reactions involved in ageing. Continued degradation of proteins, lipids and nucleic acids damage cell constituents and reduce the seed’s metabolic capacity, eventually impairing the ability to germinate. This review captures the evolution of knowledge on seed longevity over the past five decades in relation to seed ageing mechanisms, technology development, including tools to predict seed storage behaviour and non-invasive techniques for seed longevity assessment. It is concluded that seed storage biology is a complex science covering seed physiology, biophysics, biochemistry and multi-omic technologies, and simultaneous knowledge advancement in these areas is necessary to improve seed storage efficacy for crops and wild species biodiversity conservation.

29 October 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHongying Chen
Hongying Chen
DODaniel Osuna
Daniel Osuna
CLColville Louise
Colville Louise
OSOSCAR LORENZO SANCHEZ
OSCAR LORENZO SANCHEZ
KGKai Graeber
Kai Graeber
IKIlse Kranner
Ilse Kranner
Understanding of seed ageing, which leads to viability loss during storage, is vital for ex situ plant conservation and agriculture alike. Yet the potential for regulation at the transcriptional level has not been fully investigated. Here, we studied the relationship between seed viability, gene expression and glutathione redox status during artificial ageing of pea (Pisum sativum) seeds. Transcriptome-wide analysis using microarrays was complemented with qRT-PCR analysis of selected genes and a multilevel analysis of the antioxidant glutathione. Partial degradation of DNA and RNA occurred from the onset of artificial ageing at 60% RH and 50°C, and transcriptome profiling showed that the expression of genes associated with programmed cell death, oxidative stress and protein ubiquitination were altered prior to any sign of viability loss. After 25 days of ageing viability started to decline in conjunction with progressively oxidising cellular conditions, as indicated by a shift of the glutathione redox state towards more positive values (>−190 mV). The unravelling of the molecular basis of seed ageing revealed that transcriptome reprogramming is a key component of the ageing process, which influences the progression of programmed cell death and decline in antioxidant capacity that ultimately lead to seed viability loss.