Arthur J Chang

Dr. Arthur J Chang

Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 January 2023 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPatrick O. Kenney
Patrick O. Kenney
ACArthur J Chang
Arthur J Chang
LKLorna Krabill
Lorna Krabill
MHMark Hicar
Mark Hicar
This study describes differences in clinical presentation in hospitalized children with acute COVID-19 and MIS-C between the Delta and Omicron (BA.1.1) waves in a tertiary children’s hospital. This retrospective cohort study with case adjudication of hospitalized children with SARS-CoV-2-positive testing or MIS-C diagnosis occurred during the Delta and Omicron waves, from August 2021 until February 2022. There were no differences noted by race, but both waves disproportionally affected black children (24% and 25%). Assigned by a three-person expert panel, incidental diagnoses were higher in the Omicron wave (34% versus 19%). Hospitalization rates of non-incidental cases were higher during Omicron (3.8 versus 5.9 per 1000 PCR-positive community cases). Respiratory-related admissions were prominent during Delta, while Omicron clinical presentations varied, including a high number of cases of croup and seizures. Length of stay and ICU use during Omicron was significantly less than Delta for MIS-C and acute cases. Estimation of vaccination efficacy for preventing hospital admissions was 85.1–91.7% in the early Omicron period. Our estimates suggest that a protective role for vaccination continues into the Omicron wave. The high rate of incidental cases during the Omicron wave should be considered when reviewing more cursory summative data sets. This study emphasizes the need for continued clinical suspicion of COVID-19 even when lower respiratory symptoms are not dominant.
1

10 February 2024 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRamesh Kordi
Ramesh Kordi
ACArthur J Chang
Arthur J Chang
MHMark Hicar
Mark Hicar
Coxsackieviruses (CVs) are common causes of infections and can be life-threatening. Unfortunately, rigorous studies guiding the clinician in interpreting CV serum antibody titer testing is lacking. To explore the epidemiology of circulating CVs and the serological test utility in aiding diagnosis of CV infections in our community, we obtained results of CV immunologic diagnostic tests between 2018 and 2022 from a regional healthcare database. For CV type A, rare individuals had positive CF (complement fixation) tests whereas all 16 individuals with IFA testing showed at least one positive serotype. For CV type B CF testing, 52.2% of 222 patients had at least one serotype positive, with B5 being most common and also the most common with higher titers (14.8% with ≥1:32). We found a significant reduction in seropositivity rate during the pandemic in 2020 compared to 2018, which continued through 2022 (OR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.08–0.49, p-value < 0.001). During the pandemic, the seasonal pattern of positive tests varied from the pre-pandemic pattern. Testing for CVs was increased after the first year of the pandemic. Overall, the variability by month and seasonal change in our data support that CF testing can be used to identify recent CVB infection.


12 June 2025 in Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlice I Sato
Alice I Sato
BBBradford Becken
Bradford Becken
ACArthur J Chang
Arthur J Chang
SDShirley F Delair
Shirley F Delair
LELourdes Eguiguren
Lourdes Eguiguren
KNKari Neemann
Kari Neemann
Objective: To illustrate how a partnership between an academic medical center and a public health department successfully responded to a large tuberculosis (TB) exposure at a community daycare center. Setting: A multidisciplinary team rapidly established a dedicated TB Exposure Clinic to evaluate and screen exposed children requiring window prophylaxis. Patients: The exposure affected 592 individuals, including 359 children under five—those at highest risk for severe disease. Interventions: Given the vulnerability of young children to TB infection, timely evaluation and initiation of window prophylaxis were prioritized. Results: Over two days, 162 children were assessed for TB window prophylaxis, and 110 additional children underwent TB screening. Conclusions: By leveraging clinical expertise, interdisciplinary collaboration, and informatics infrastructure, the TB Exposure Clinic delivered rapid, comprehensive care while minimizing disruption to local healthcare systems. This model underscores the essential role of academic medical centers in supporting public health responses.

2 September 2026
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
CMClayton T. Mowrer
Clayton T. Mowrer
SDShirley Delair
Shirley Delair
ACArthur J Chang
Arthur J Chang