Kim JH, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jan;22(1):131-138. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0116

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis, to examine whether degree of common extensor tendon (CET) injury is related to other elbow abnormalities on MRI, and to investigate the correlation between elbow abnormalities on MRI and patients' symptoms. Methods: Fifty-one patients (32 women and 19 men; mean age: 50 years (range, 22e63)) with a diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis were included in the study. The average duration of symptoms was 2.3 years. MRI scoring system was used to grade the CET injuries and associated injuries in the elbow joint. Three independent radiologists retrospectively reviewed MRI images. Inter- and intra-observer reliabilities for diagnosing lateral epicondylitis were calculated using kappa statistics, and Spearman's rank correlation analysis was used to analyze relationships between degree of CET injury and the associated abnormalities of elbow joints. Statistical relations were considered significant for p values of <0.05. In addition, using Spearman's rank correlation analysis, CET injuries and associated abnormalities of elbow joints were correlated with clinical symptoms using visual analog scale pain scores. Results: Various degrees of CET injuries were found in total of 51 patients. Radial collateral ligament and lateral ulnar collateral ligament (RCL/LCL) was the most common accompanying elbow abnormality other than CET injuries. Inter- and intra-observer agreements of CET and RCL/LUCL injuries on MRI were excellent. There were significant correlation between degrees of CET and RCL/LUCL injuries (correlation coefficient r ¼ 0.667, p < 0.01) and between degree of RCL/LUCL injuries and visual analog 11-point pain box scale (VAS) scores (correlation coefficient r ¼ 0.478, p ¼ 0.033). Conclusion: MRI showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliabilities for the evaluation of lateral epicondylitis. In addition to common extensor tendinopathy, RCL/LUCL abnormality was the most common accompanying finding and degree of RCL/LUCL injuries positively correlated with degree of CET injuries. Furthermore, degree of RCL/LUCL injuries positively correlates with severity of pain. Level of evidence: Level IV, Diagnostic study.

Dir Journal Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Chest injuries are common and inevitable complications of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study aimed to investigate lung parenchymal and thoracic skeletal injuries after CPR by using computed tomography (CT) and to analyze the correlation between the duration of CPR and related complications. We examined 43 non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients who were successfully resuscitated after CPR and had chest CT scans within 24 hours of CPR. Lung parenchymal injuries were assessed by quantifying the lung contusion score (LCS) on the CT images, and each skeletal injury was investigated by classifying the location and the distribution. Other CPR-related chest injuries were also described, such as pleural effusion/hemothorax, pneumothorax, and retrosternal hematoma. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether the duration of CPR was correlated with each complication. Lung contusions were found in all of the patients (mean LCS: 22, range: 5–47). The distribution of lung contusions were predominantly in the bilateral dependent portions of the lungs (41 patients). All of the rib fractures occurred in the anterior arc (43 patients), and the sternal fractures occurred predominantly in the mid-sternal body (31 patients). In patients younger than 70 years old, the number of rib fractures significantly increased among those who underwent CPR for more than 25 minutes compared to those who received CPR for less than 25 minutes (median 4.5 vs 9; mean 8.3 vs 5.6 per person, respectively; P = .035). The risk of sternal fracture tended to be higher for patients who received CPR for more than 10 minutes compared to those who received CPR for less than 10 minutes (odds ratio: 3.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.86–15.06; P = .079). However, there was no statistically significant correlation between the duration of CPR and LCS or other CPR-related chest injuries. The duration of CPR was associated with the number of rib fractures and the occurrence of sternal fractures, but it did not affect the extent of CPR-related lung contusions or other CPR-related chest injuries. All of the rib fractures occurred in the anterior arc, while the sternal fractures occurred predominantly in the mid-sternal body. However, since this study was conducted in a single institution, the number of patients included was relatively small, thus limiting the statistical analysis.

Original Article SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung carcinoma: clinicodemographic, computed tomography, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography features Jong Hee Kim, Jung Han Woo, Chae Young Lim, Taein An, Joungho Han, Myung Jin Chung, Yoon Ki Cha

This study investigated the rate at which radiologists miss or detect incidental breast cancers on chest CT and to compare the CT features between the two groups. This retrospective study evaluated chest CT examinations and medical records of patients who registered with the diagnosis code of “breast cancer” between January 2016 and December 2020, and who had undergone contrast enhanced chest CT 3–18 months before registration, during which they were unaware of any breast lesions. This study found that out of 84 patients, incidental breast cancer lesions were missed in 54 (64.3%) and detected in 30 (53.7%). The initial treatment was delayed in the missed breast lesions group (p = 0.004). Breast lesions of smaller sizes (<9.0 mm, p = 0.01), or with lower enhancement ratios (<1.4, p = 0.009), were more likely to be missed. When three radiologists re-read the CTs with more attention to breast area, they detected breast cancers with higher accuracies (90.1%, 87.9%, and 81.3%). In summary, this study revealed that radiologists miss 64.3% of incidental breast cancers on chest CT, especially those of sub-centimeter sizes and weak enhancements.