This article reviews the anti-inflammatory relative and anti-infectious effects ofEvodia rutaecarpaand its major bioactive components and the involvement of the nitric oxide synthases, cyclooxygenase, NADPH oxidase, nuclear factor kappa B, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha, reactive oxygen species, prostaglandins, tumor necrosis factor, LIGHT, amyloid protein and orexigenic neuropeptides. Their potential applications for the treatment of endotoxaemia, obesity, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and their uses as cardiovascular and gastrointestinal protective agents, analgesics, anti-oxidant, anti-atherosclerosis agents, dermatological agents and anti-infectious agents are highlighted. Stimulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide release may partially explain the analgesic, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal protective, anti-obese activities ofEvodia rutaecarpaand its major bioactive components.

Dimemorfan, an antitussive and a sigma‐1 (σ₁) receptor agonist, has been reported to display neuroprotective properties. We set up an animal model of ischemic stroke injury by inducing cerebral ischemia (for 1 h) followed by reperfusion (for 24 h) (CI/R) in rats to examine the protective effects and action mechanisms of dimemorfan against stroke‐induced damage. Treatment with dimemorfan (1.0 μg/kg and 10 μg/kg, i.v.) either 15 min before ischemia or at the time of reperfusion, like the putative σ₁ receptor agonist, PRE084 (10 μg/kg, i.v.), ameliorated the size of the infarct zone by 67–72% or 51–52%, respectively, which was reversed by pre‐treatment with the selective σ₁ receptor antagonist, BD1047 (20 μg/kg, i.v.). Major pathological mechanisms leading to CI/R injury including excitotoxicity, oxidative/nitrosative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis are all downstream events initiated by excessive accumulation of extracellular glutamate. Dimemorfan treatment (10 μg/kg, i.v., at the time of reperfusion) inhibited the expressions of monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 and interleukin‐1β, which occurred in parallel with decreases in neutrophil infiltration, activation of inflammation‐related signals (p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase, nuclear factor‐κB, and signal transducer and activator of transcription‐1), expression of neuronal and inducible nitric oxide synthase, oxidative/nitrosative tissue damage (lipid peroxidation, protein nitrosylation, and 8‐hydroxy‐guanine formation), and apoptosis in the ipsilateral cortex after CI/R injury. Dimemorfan treatment at the time of reperfusion, although did not prevent an early rise of glutamate level, significantly prevented subsequent glutamate accumulation after reperfusion. This inhibitory effect was lasted for more than 4 h and was reversed by pre‐treatment with BD1047. These results suggest that dimemorfan activates the σ₁ receptor to reduce glutamate accumulation and then suppresses initiation of inflammation‐related events and signals as well as induction of oxidative and nitrosative stresses, leading to reductions in tissue damage and cell death. In conclusion, our results demonstrate for the first time that dimemorfan exhibits protective effects against ischemic stroke in CI/R rats probably through modulation of σ₁ receptor‐dependent signals to prevent subsequent glutamate accumulation and its downstream pathologic events.