Jing Dai

Prof. Dr. Jing Dai

University of Nottingham Business School, University of Nottingham, Ningbo 315100, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2016 in International Journal of Production Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HCHing Kai Chan
Hing Kai Chan
RYRachel W.Y. Yee
Rachel W.Y. Yee
Jing DaiJing Dai
Jing Dai
MLMing K. Lim
Ming K. Lim

28 June 2011 in Journal of Operations Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHChristian Hofer
Christian Hofer
DCDavid E. Cantor
David E. Cantor
Jing DaiJing Dai
Jing Dai

11 August 2015 in Journal of Business Logistics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jing DaiJing Dai
Jing Dai
DCDavid E. Cantor
David E. Cantor
FMFrank Montabon
Frank Montabon

1 October 2012 in International Journal of Production Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jing DaiJing Dai
Jing Dai
JBJennifer Blackhurst
Jennifer Blackhurst
Recently, companies have become increasingly aware of the need to evaluate suppliers from a sustainability perspective. Introducing the triple bottom line (economic, social, and environmental performance) into supplier assessment and selection decisions embeds a new set of trade-offs, complicating the decision-making process. Although many tools have been developed to help purchasing managers make more effective decisions, decision support tools, and methodologies which integrate sustainability (triple bottom line) into supplier assessment and selection are still sparse in the literature. Moreover, most approaches have not taken into consideration the impact of business objectives and requirements of company stakeholders on the supplier evaluation criteria. To help advance this area of research and further integrate sustainability into the supplier selection modelling area, we develop an integrated analytical approach, combining Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with Quality Function Deployment (QFD), to enable the ‘voice’ of company stakeholders in the process. Drawing on the sustainable purchasing strategy development process, our AHP–QFD approach comprises four hierarchical phases: linking customer requirements with the company's sustainability strategy, determining the sustainable purchasing competitive priority, developing sustainable supplier assessment criteria, and lastly assessing the suppliers. An illustrative example is provided to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach.

1 May 2019 in Journal of Business Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLi Cui
Li Cui
HCHing Kai Chan
Hing Kai Chan
YZYizhuo Zhou
Yizhuo Zhou
Jing DaiJing Dai
Jing Dai
JLJia Jia Lim
Jia Jia Lim

1 November 2017 in International Journal of Production Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jing DaiJing Dai
Jing Dai
DCDavid E. Cantor
David E. Cantor
FMFrank L. Montabon
Frank L. Montabon