Background and Purpose: Previous studies have shown that older adults at high fall risk exhibit altered spatiotemporal gait parameters such as lesser gait speed, shorter step length, and greater step width compared with their healthy counterparts. Measurement of these gait parameters for older adults can play a pivotal role in clinical evaluation. While the GAITRite walkway has been previously validated and used extensively for research purposes, the Zeno walkway validity has not been established. Although both walkways use pressure sensor–based technology, comparison of the spatiotemporal gait measurements between the systems for older adults is unknown. Our purpose was to determine the concurrent validity of the Zeno walkway with the gold-standard GAITRite walkway among healthy older adults and those at high fall risk using a cross-sectional study design. Methods: Thirty healthy older adults and 17 older adults at high fall risk performed 5 walking trials barefoot on a 16´ × 4´ Zeno walkway and a 14´ × 2´ GAITRite walkway in a quasi-randomized order. Testing on the Zeno walkway was performed in a continuous manner while testing on the GAITRite walkway was performed using 5 discrete trials. Walking trials were done at self-selected comfortable and fast pace conditions. Data from the Zeno walkway were processed using the PKMAS software. Data from the GAITRite were processed using the GAITRite software. For each group and condition, spatiotemporal gait parameters common to both walkways' footfall processing software were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Concurrent validity was estimated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(2,5)) and Bland-Altman plots. Results and Discussion: Both groups had significantly greater stride width on the GAITRite walkway during both conditions. During the fast pace condition, both groups walked with greater gait speed, cadence, and stride velocity, lesser step time, stance time, and double-support time, greater percentage of gait cycle spent in single-support phase, and lesser percentage of gait cycle spent in double-support phase on the GAITRite walkway. Differences observed could be attributed to surface textures, software used to process the footfalls, dimensions of the walkways, or the continuous versus discrete protocols used in the current study. The ranges of ICC(2,5) values for healthy older adults and adults at high fall risk walking at a comfortable pace were 0.449 to 0.918 and 0.854 to 0.969 and at a fast pace were 0.784 to 0.964 and 0.850 to 0.976, respectively. These values imply that the concurrent validity was moderate for most temporal parameters when healthy older adults walked at comfortable pace and excellent otherwise. Overall, the concurrent validity between both walkways was acceptable. Conclusion: Concurrent validity for spatiotemporal parameters between the GAITRite walkway and the Zeno walkway was moderate to excellent for older adults dependent on the specific parameter (spatial vs temporal), population (healthy or fall risk), and walking pace (comfortable or fast).

What are comfortable gait speed values for apparently healthy adults? How do these differ by age group, sex and geographical region? Systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. Apparently healthy, community-dwelling adults who have undergone measurement of comfortable gait speed. Potentially relevant studies were identified in four databases. Extracted data from studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were added to a database containing the same information from a meta-analysis published a decade ago. The weighted mean comfortable gait speed was calculated along with the 95% confidence interval for each stratum of age/sex using a random-effects model. Mean gait speeds were further stratified by the continent where the study took place. Tests of homogeneity included I² and prediction intervals. Meta-analysis of data from 51,248 apparently healthy adults was stratified by age (in decades) and sex. Male gait speed slowed beyond age 50 years whereas female gait speed slowed beyond age 30 years. The weighted mean gait speed ranged from 97 cm/s (females aged ≥ 80 years) to 140 cm/s (males aged 40 to 49 years). The I² values ranged from 0 to 34.07; prediction interval ranges varied from a low of 30 (125 to 155 cm/s; males aged 40 to 49 years) to a high of 77 (83 to 160 cm/s; females aged 60 to 69 years). There was considerable overlap in confidence intervals between continents for each sex/age group. Comfortable gait speed slowed through the adult years, but males maintained a faster walking speed than females. Further stratification of comfortable gait speed by geographical region is not warranted.

A history of 3 or more concussions is frequently associated with numerous short- and long-term neuropathologies. Impairments in postural control are a known acute consequence of concussion; however, limited evidence exists on the effects of multiple concussions on gait. The purpose of this study was to assess gait stepping characteristics in collegiate aged student-athletes based on concussion history. There were 63 participants divided into 3 even groups based on concussion history: ≥3 concussions, 1-2 concussions, and 0 concussion. All participants completed 10 trials of gait on a 4.9 m instrumented walkway. The dependent variables of interest included both gait stepping characteristics (step velocity, length, and width, double support time, and the percentage of the gait cycle in stance) and coefficient of variability (CoV) measures (step length, time, and width). The gait stepping characteristics were compared first with a MANOVA with follow-up 1-way ANOVAs and Tukey post hoc tests as appropriate. The CoV measures were compared with 1-way ANOVAs and Tukey post hoc tests. There were main effects for group for step velocity, length, width, and double support time. Overall, the 0 concussion group displayed typical healthy young gait parameters and performed significantly better than either concussion group. The 0 concussion group had a significantly greater step length CoV, but there were no differences in the step time or width CoV. This finding provides evidence of subtle impairments in postural control during gait among individuals with prior history of concussion which could be an early indicator of future neurological deficiencies. The limited difference in the variability measures is consistent with prior static stance studies and could suggest the individuals constrain their motor systems to reduce variability. Taken together, these findings suggest a conservative gait strategy which is adopted by individuals with a history of concussions.