Jayavelu Udaya Prakash

Prof. Dr. Jayavelu Udaya Prakash

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Materials Today: Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BRB. Ravi
B. Ravi
BNB. Balu Naik
B. Balu Naik
JPJayavelu Udaya Prakash
Jayavelu Udaya Prakash

1 January 2013 in Procedia Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJayavelu Udaya Prakash
Jayavelu Udaya Prakash
TMT.V. Moorthy
T.V. Moorthy
JPJ. Milton Peter
J. Milton Peter
In this present investigation, Hybrid composites containing Aluminium alloy (A413), flyash and boron carbide were fabricated using stir casting technique. The objective of this work is to investigate the effect of parameters like gap voltage, pulse on time, pulse off time, wire feed and percentage reinforcement on the responses material removal rate as well as surface roughness while machining Aluminium alloy (A413)/flyash/boron carbide hybrid composites using Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM). Experimentation has been done on Taguchi's L27 orthogonal array under different combinations of parameters. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been used to determine the design parameters significantly influencing the response. The influence of these parameters on the responses has been evaluated using Signal to Noise (S/N) ratio analysis. The experimental results proposed optimal combination of parameters which give the maximum material removal rate and minimum surface roughness. Finally, confirmation experiments were carried out to identify the effectiveness of the proposed method

28 October 2023 in Crystals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSunder Jebarose Juliyana
Sunder Jebarose Juliyana
JPJayavelu Udaya Prakash
Jayavelu Udaya Prakash
CRCharles Sarala Rubi
Charles Sarala Rubi
Sachin SalunkheSachin Salunkhe
Sachin Salunkhe
SGSharad Ramdas Gawade
Sharad Ramdas Gawade
AKAli K. Kamrani
Ali K. Kamrani
The materials used in engineering have seen a significant transformation in the contemporary world. Numerous composites are employed to overcome these problems because conventional materials are unable to meet the needs of current applications. For quite some time, professional engineers and researchers have been captivated by the problem of choosing the best machining parameters for new composite materials. Wire electrical discharge machining is a popular unconventional machining process that is often used for making complex shapes. Numerous process parameters influence the WEDM process. Thus, to achieve affordable and high-quality machining, the right set of process parameters must be provided. Finding the wire cut EDM optimized settings for the fabricated LM5/ZrO2/Gr composite is the main aim of this research. The chosen input parameters are the wire feed, pulse on and pulse off times, the gap voltage, and the reinforcing percentage. In this study, LM5/ZrO2/Gr composites were made from stir casting with 6-weight percent ZrO2 as the reinforcement and varying graphite percentages of 2, 3, and 4 wt%. Then they were machined in WEDM using L27 OA to seek the best parameters for machining by adjusting the input parameters. The findings were analysed by means of grey relation analysis (GRA) to achieve the supreme material removal rate (MRR), lowest surface roughness (SR), and a smaller kerf width (Kw) simultaneously. GRA determines the impact of the machining variables on the standard characteristics and tests the impact of the machining parameters. Confirmation experiments were performed finally to acquire the best findings. The experimental findings and GRA show that the ideal process conditions for achieving the highest grey relational grade (GRG) are 6% ZrO2 with 2% graphite reinforcement, a wire feed of 6 m/min, a pulse off time (Toff) of 40 µs, a pulse on time (Ton) of 110 µs, and a gap voltage (GV) of 20 V. The gap voltage (22.87%) has the greatest impact on the GRG according to analysis of variance (ANOVA), subsequent to the interaction between the pulse on time and the gap voltage (16.73%), pulse on time (15.28%), and pulse off time (14.42%). The predicted value of the GRG is 0.679; however, the experimental GRG value is 0.672. The values are well-aligned between the expected and the experimental results. The error is only 3.29%, which is really little. Finally, mathematical models were created for each response.

1 January 2020 in Materials Today: Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKK. Karthik
K. Karthik
DRD. Rajamani
D. Rajamani
AMA. Manimaran
A. Manimaran
JPJayavelu Udaya Prakash
Jayavelu Udaya Prakash

1 January 2018 in Materials Today: Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJayavelu Udaya Prakash
Jayavelu Udaya Prakash
SAS. Ananth
S. Ananth
GSG. Sivakumar
G. Sivakumar
TMT.V. Moorthy
T.V. Moorthy

1 January 2018 in Materials Today: Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJayavelu Udaya Prakash
Jayavelu Udaya Prakash
SJS. Jebarose Juliyana
S. Jebarose Juliyana
PPP. Pallavi
P. Pallavi
TMT.V. Moorthy
T.V. Moorthy