Shengyang Yuan

Mr. Shengyang Yuan

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 April 2016 in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XLXianfeng Liu
Xianfeng Liu
SYShengyang Yuan
Shengyang Yuan
YSYannick Sieffert
Yannick Sieffert
SFStephen Fityus
Stephen Fityus
OBOlivier Buzzi
Olivier Buzzi

22 April 2016 in Acta Geotechnica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SYShengyang Yuan
Shengyang Yuan
XLXianfeng Liu
Xianfeng Liu
SSScott William Sloan
Scott William Sloan
OBOlivier Buzzi
Olivier Buzzi

15 June 2016 in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XLXianfeng Liu
Xianfeng Liu
CZChonglei ZHANG
Chonglei ZHANG
SYShengyang Yuan
Shengyang Yuan
SFStephen Fityus
Stephen Fityus
SSScott William Sloan
Scott William Sloan
OBOlivier Buzzi
Olivier Buzzi

1 December 2018 in Soils and Foundations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GJGuanlu Jiang
Guanlu Jiang
WCWeizhi Chen
Weizhi Chen
XLXianfeng Liu
Xianfeng Liu
SYShengyang Yuan
Shengyang Yuan
LWLijun Wu
Lijun Wu
CZChonglei Zhang
Chonglei Zhang

4 February 2023 in Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXianfeng Liu
Xianfeng Liu
JXJunhua XIAO
Junhua XIAO
DCDegou Cai
Degou Cai
QSQian Su
Qian Su
GYGuangqing Yang
Guangqing Yang
GJGuanlu Jiang
Guanlu Jiang
In the last decade, the design and construction technologies of subgrade in high-speed railway developed significantly. This paper reviewed corresponding development in five aspects, including mechanical properties of fill materials, dynamic performance of subgrade, foundation treatment, retaining structure and smart construction technologies. It showed that for unbonded granular materials, it was acceptable to use static strength for subgrade design, but for clayey soil it would be more appropriate to base on shakedown theory. The mechanism for lime modified clay has been thoroughly reviewed, and the effect of lime content, curing age, and curing conditions on the behavior of lime-treated clay was discussed. The dynamic response of subgrade, especially the long-term deformation and dynamic stability analysis were important to understanding the behavior of high-speed railway subgrade. The effect of track types, operation speed etc. on the dynamic response of subgrade were reviewed first. Then, the prediction methods, influencing factors, and corresponding issue for long-term deformation of subgrade were presented, following by the methods used for dynamic stability analysis. Three types of foundation treatment methods, including geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankment, pile-raft structure, and pile-plate structure, were reviewed for the corresponding load transmission mechanism, and application scenario. The static and dynamic behavior of four types of retaining structures were presented, including cantilever retaining wall, geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining wall, anchored retaining structure, and retaining wall reinforced by soil nailing. Finally, a series of new technologies correlated to smart construction was introduced, relating to the survey, design, construction, detection and management of subgrade.

11 September 2019 in KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZFZhengdao Fu
Zhengdao Fu
GJGuanlu Jiang
Guanlu Jiang
SYShengyang Yuan
Shengyang Yuan
ALAnhong Li
Anhong Li
For bridge engineering on steep slope, where the deformation of piled bridge foundation is strictly controlled, stabilizing piles are sometimes installed to minimize the soil shear deformation around the bridge foundation. A limited number of work has been carried out about the effects of stabilizing pile on the behavior of piled bridge foundation on the slope. In this study, model test and numerical simulations were carried out aiming at clarifying the lateral behavior of piled bridge foundation and stabilizing piles on steep slope. Evolution of bending moment in piles, soil pressure around piles, and lateral displacement of piles and soils were monitored throughout the model test. Model test suggested that back stabilizing piles subjected to much larger bending moment along the pile and force that acts on piles above the sliding surface than those of bridge piles. Numerical analyses were carried out to optimize the location of stabilizing piles. Front stabilizing piles should be located close to the bridge foundation. The optimum position for back stabilizing piles was 3 to 5 times of stabilizing piles width away from the bridge foundation.