Background: Knee arthroscopic arthrolysis serves as an effective treatment for knee arthrofibrosis. However, hemarthrosis is the most common complication in arthroscopic surgery, which has potential adverse effects on postoperative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) in knee arthroscopic arthrolysis.Methods: A total of 87 patients with knee arthrofibrosis who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis from September 2019 to June 2021 were eligible for this retrospective review. Patients in the TXA group (n = 47) received topical administration of TXA (50 mL, 10 mg/mL) at the end of the surgery, and patients in the control group (n = 40) received no TXA. The postoperative drainage volumes, hematologic levels, inflammatory marker levels, knee range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, Lysholm knee scores and complications were compared between the two groups. The curative effect of each group was calculated according to Judet’s criteria.Results: The mean drainage volumes on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 2, and total drainage volume were significantly lower in the TXA group than in the control group (P < 0.001 for all). The TXA group had significantly lower postoperative CRP and IL-6 levels on POD 1 and POD 2, and at postoperative week (POW) 1 and POW 2 than the control group. The VAS pain scores in the TXA group were significantly lower on POD 1 and POD 2, and at POW 1 and POW 2 than those in the control group (P < 0.001 for all). Patients in the TXA group showed better postoperative ROM and Lysholm knee scores at POW 1 and POW 2. No patient had any complications such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or infection. The excellent and good rates of knee arthroscopic arthrolysis were comparable between the two groups at the sixth postoperative month (P = 0.536).Conclusions: Topical administration of TXA in knee arthroscopic arthrolysis can reduce postoperative blood loss and inflammatory response, alleviate early postoperative pain, increase early postoperative knee ROM, and improve early postoperative knee function without increased risks.

Objective: There has been long‐standing debate about whether a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) gap should be filled with autologous bone graft or any other filler to expedite the healing process. The main purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of MOWHTO with an opening gap ≥10 mm, utilizing autograft, allograft, or no graft at 1 year postoperatively.Methods: A total of 68 patients were included in this retrospective study and divided into three treatment groups: Group A (no bone graft), Group B (autologous iliac crest graft), and Group C (allogenous tibia plateau graft). At postoperative 1‐year follow‐up, the area of callus filling in the most medial side of the knee was measured using anteroposterior radiographs, and a modified van Hemert scoring system was used to evaluate bone union outcomes in five mediolaterally divided zones. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and relevant complications were assessed. The correlations between the gap width and bone union scores were evaluated.Results: Patients in the autograft group demonstrated better bone union progression (p = 0.031) and higher bone union scores (p < 0.01) compared to patients in the allograft or no graft groups. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative WOMAC scores and incidence of complications among the three groups. No discernible linear relationships between the width of the opening gap and the bone union score were found.Conclusion: For MOWHTOs with an average gap opening width of 12.1 mm, autografts resulted in superior bone union outcomes compared to allografts and no graft at 1 year postoperatively. However, no bone graft achieved similar outcomes to allografts, suggesting that routine use of allografts should not be recommended.

Background. The treatment results of core decompression (CD) and biomechanical support are not always satisfactory in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Stem cell therapy has been incorporated into traditional treatment in order to promote bone regeneration. The efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy combined with CD or biomechanical support on advanced and long-term patients with ONFH were unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether stem cell combination therapy is superior to single CD or porous tantalum rod implantation treatment in ONFH. Methods. A systematic search of the literature was performed to evaluate all included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on stem cell combination therapy for patients with ONFH in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase sites. We assessed the quality and risk of bias for the included studies. And the outcomes of Harris hip score (HHS), visual analogue scale (VAS), and adverse events were statistically analyzed. Results. We included 10 randomized controlled trials, containing a total of 498 patients with 719 hips. Stem cell therapy combined with CD versus CD alone for HHS of ONFH was different (MD = 8.87, 95% CI = [5.53, 12.22], ). The combination of stem cell therapy and CD can effectively improve HHS. Similarly, the VAS of the stem cell combination therapy group also differed compared with the control group (MD = −14.07, 95% CI = [−18.32, −9.82], ). The result showed that stem cell combination therapy can relieve the pain of patients with ONFH. There was no significant difference in adverse response outcome events between the combination therapy group and the control group (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = [0.62, 3.97], ). Conclusions. Stem cell therapy combined with core decompression is an effective and feasible method with few complications in the clinical treatment of early-stage ONFH. Even in the combination of porous tantalum rod implantation and peripheral blood stem cells, stem cell combination therapy is superior to single biomechanical support treatment. But high-quality, large-sample, multicenter, and long-term follow-up RCTs are still needed to corroborate the efficacy and safety of stem cell combination therapy in ONFH treatment.

Background: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumor (D-TGCT), formerly known as pigmented villonodular synovitis, is a rare, locally aggressive, invasive soft tissue tumor that primarily occurs in the knee. Surgical excision is the main treatment option, but there is a high recurrence rate. Arthroscopic surgical techniques are emphasized because they are less traumatic and offer faster postoperative recovery, but detailed reports on arthroscopic techniques and outcomes of D-TGCT in large cohorts are still lacking. Questions/purposes: (1) What is the recurrence rate of knee D-TGCT after multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy? (2) What are the complications, knee ROM, pain score, and patient-reported outcomes for patients, and do they differ between patients with and without recurrence? (3) What factors are associated with recurrence after arthroscopic treatment in patients with D-TGCT? Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study conducted between January 2010 and April 2021, we treated 295 patients with knee D-TGCTs. We considered patients undergoing initial surgical treatment with multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy as potentially eligible. Based on that, 27% (81 of 295) of patients were excluded because of recurrence after synovectomy performed at another institution. Of the 214 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 17% (36 of 214) were lost to follow-up, leaving 83% (178 of 214) of patients in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (50 of 178) of patients were men and 72% (128 of 178) were women, with a median (range) age of 36 years (7 to 69). The median follow-up duration was 80 months (26 to 149). All patients underwent multiportal (anterior and posterior approaches) arthroscopic synovectomy, and all surgical protocols were determined by discussion among four surgeons after preoperative MRI. A combined open posterior incision was used for patients with lesions that invaded or surrounded the blood vessels and nerves or invaded the muscle space extraarticularly. Standard postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was recommended for all patients with D-TGCT who had extraarticular and posterior compartment invasion; for patients with only anterior compartment invasion, radiotherapy was recommended for severe cases as assessed by the surgeons and radiologists based on preoperative MRI and intraoperative descriptions. Postoperative recurrence at 5 years was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator. The WOMAC score (0 to 96, with higher scores representing a worse outcome; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 8.5), the Lysholm knee score (0 to 100, with higher scores being better knee function; MCID 25.4), the VAS for pain (0 to 10, with higher scores representing more pain; MCID 2.46), and knee ROM were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Because we did not have preoperative patient-reported outcomes scores, we present data on the proportion of patients who achieved the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each of those outcome metrics, which were 14.6 of 96 points on the WOMAC, 52.5 of 100 points on the Lysholm, and 2.32 of 10 points on the VAS. Results: The symptomatic or radiographically documented recurrence at 5 years was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7% to 17%) using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with a mean recurrence time of 33 ± 19 months. Of these, three were asymptomatic recurrences found during regular MRI reviews, and the remaining 19 underwent repeat surgery. There was one intraoperative complication (vascular injury) with no effect on postoperative limb function and eight patients with postoperative joint stiffness, seven of whom improved with prolonged rehabilitation and one with manipulation under anesthesia. No postradiotherapy complications were found. The proportion of patients who achieved the preestablished PASS was 99% (176 of 178) for the VAS pain score, 97% (173 of 178) for the WOMAC score, and 100% (178 of 178) for the Lysholm score. A lower percentage of patients with recurrence achieved the PASS for WOMAC score than patients without recurrence (86% [19] versus 99% [154], OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.52]; p = 0.01), whereas no difference was found in the percentage of VAS score (95% [21] versus 99% [155], OR 0.14 [95% CI 0.01 to 2.25]; p = 0.23) or Lysholm score (100% [22] versus 100% [156], OR 1 [95% CI 1 to 1]; p = 0.99). Moreover, patients in the recurrence group showed worse knee flexion (median 135° [100° to 135°] versus median 135° [80° to 135°]; difference of medians 0°; p = 0.03), worse WOMAC score (median 3.5 [0 to 19] versus median 1 [0 to 29]; difference of medians 2.5; p = 0.01), and higher VAS pain score (median 1 [0 to 4] versus median 0 [0 to 4]; difference of medians 1; p < 0.01) than those in the nonrecurrence group, although no differences reached the MCID. No factors were associated with D-TGCT recurrence, including the use of postoperative radiotherapy, surgical technique, and invasion extent. Conclusion: This single-center, large-cohort retrospective study confirmed that multiportal arthroscopic surgery can be used to treat knee D-TGCTs with a low recurrence rate, few complications, and satisfactory postoperative outcomes. Surgeons should conduct a thorough preoperative evaluation, meticulous arthroscopic synovectomy, and regular postoperative follow-up when treating patients with D-TGCT to reduce postoperative recurrence. Because the available evidence does not appear to fully support the use of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in all patients with D-TGCTs and our study design is inadequate to resolve this controversial issue, future studies should look for more appropriate indications for radiotherapy, such as planning based on a more precise classification of lesion invasion. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.